|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Job No.: TCS00694/13 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Agreement No. CE 45/2008
(CE) Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
and Associated Works |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
10th Quarterly Environmental
Monitoring & Audit Summary Report ¡V (November 2015 to January 2016) |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared
For |
|
|
||
|
|
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) |
|
|
||
Quality Index |
|||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
27
April 2016 |
TCS00694/13/600/R0141v2 |
|
|
Nicola
Hon (Environmental Consultant) |
T.W. Tam (Environmental Team Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Description |
1 |
30 March 2016 |
First
Submission |
2 |
27 April 2016 |
Amended
against the IEC¡¦s comments on 18 April 2016 |
|
|
|
This
report has been prepared by Action-United Environmental Services &
Consulting with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of
the Agreement with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions
of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement
with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in
respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is
confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever
nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made
known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. |
Executive Summary
ES.01. This is the 10th Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
for the ¡§Liantang/Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works¡¨ under Environmental Permit No. EP-404/2011/C (hereinafter ¡¥¡¥the EP¡¦¡¦), covering the period from 1 November 2015 to 31 January 2016 (hereinafter ¡§Reporting Period¡¨).
Environmental Monitoring and
Audit Activities
ES.02. In the
Reporting Period, the active contracts included Contract 2, Contract 3,
Contract 5, Contract 6 and Contract SS C505. Environmental monitoring activities
under the EM&A programme in the Reporting Period are summarized in the
following table.
Environmental Aspect |
Monitoring
Parameters / Inspection |
Reporting Period |
|
Monitoring Locations
/ Contracts |
Total Occasions |
||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
9 |
417 |
24-hour TSP |
9 |
146 |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
10 |
155 |
Water Quality |
Water in-situ measurement and/or sampling |
WM1 & WM1-C, |
38 (*) |
WM2A & WM2A-C |
39 (*) |
||
WM2B & WM2B-C |
45 (*) |
||
WM3 &WM3-C |
39 (*) |
||
WM4, WM4-CA &WM4-CB |
38 |
||
Joint Site Inspection / Audit |
IEC, ET, the Contractor and RE joint site Environmental Inspection and Auditing |
Contract 2 |
13 |
Contract 3 |
13 |
||
Contract 5 |
13 |
||
Contract 6 |
13 |
||
Contract 7 |
2 |
||
Contract SS C505 |
13 |
(*)
number of sampling day
Breaches
of Action/Limit levels
ES.03. In the
Reporting Period, no air quality exceedances were registered but one (1) Limit
Level exceedance of construction noise was recorded. For water quality monitoring, a total of seventy-nine
(79) Action/ Limit Level exceedances were recorded including the parameters of
turbidity and SS. The summary of
breach of environmental performance is shown below.
Environmental
Aspect |
Monitoring Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Event & Action |
||
NOE Issued |
Investigation |
Corrective Actions |
||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
24-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
N/A |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Not project related |
N/A |
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The Contractor of C6 were advised to
improve the water mitigation measure as per the ISEMM of the EM&A
Manual |
Improvement works have been
undertaken by the Contractor C6 |
Turbidity |
2 |
40 |
42 |
|||
SS |
2 |
35 |
37 |
Environmental
Complaint
ES.04. In this
Reporting Period, one (1) verbal and five
(5) documented environmental complaints were received and lodged for Contracts
6. Follow up actions have been
undertaking by the Contractor to resolve the deficiencies. The investigation reports conducted by
the ET were submitted to relevant parties.
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
ES.05. No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period. However, a warning letter
from EPD was issued to Contract 6 on 1 February 2016 regarding Non Compliance
(NC) with APCO for the non-covered dump trucks travelling to Fill Bank at TM
Area 38 on 14 and 18 January 2016 respectively. As advised by the Contractor, a briefing
and warning letter has given to the relevant drivers to prevent reoccurrence of
similar case.
Reporting Changes
ES.06. No
reporting changes were made in the Reporting Period.
Future key issues
ES.07. During dry
season, special attention should be paid on the potential construction dust
impact since most of the construction sites are adjacent to villages. The
Contractor should fully implement the construction dust mitigation measures
properly.
ES.08. The
Contractor was also reminded to prevent muddy water or other water pollutants
from site surface flow to local stream such as Kong Yiu Channel and Ma Wat
Channel or public area. Water
quality mitigation measures to prevent muddy runoff into nearby water bodies or
public areas should paid attention and fully implemented.
ES.09. Construction
noise would be a key environmental issue during construction work of the
Project. Noise mitigation measures
such as using quiet plants should be implemented in accordance with the
EM&A requirement.
Table of Contents
2 Project
Organization and Construction progress
2.1 Construction
Contract Packaging
2.5 Summary of Environmental Submissions
3 Project
Organization and Construction progress
3.4 Monitoring
Frequency and Period
3.8 Derivation
of Action/Limit (A/L) Levels
3.9 Data
Management and Data QA/QC Control
4.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
5 Construction
Noise Monitoring
5.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
6.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
7.2 Records
of Waste Quantities
9 Non-compliance,
Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
9.1 Non-compliance
(exceedances)
9.2 Environmental
Complaint, Summons and Prosecution
10 Implementation
Status of Mitigation Measures
11 Conclusions
and Recommendations
List
of tables
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Table 3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Table 3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-8 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Table 3-10 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Table 4-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Air Quality A/L Levels
Table 5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Table 5-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Construction Noise A/L Levels
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 5
Table 6-2 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 3
Table 6-3 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 6
Table 6-4 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 6
Table 6-5 Summaries
of Breaches of the Existing Water Quality A/L Levels
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Table 7-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 7-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 8-1 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 2
Table 8-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 3
Table 8-3 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 5
Table 8-4 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 6
Table 8-5 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract SS C505
Table 8-6 Summary of Reminders/Observations of Site
Inspection ¡V Contract 7
Table 9-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 9-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 9-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Table 10-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List of Annexes
Appendix A Layout plan of the Project
Appendix B Environmental Management Organization Chart
Appendix C Master Construction Programme for the Contracts,
Appendix D Designated Monitoring Locations as Recommended in the Approved
EM&A Manual
Appendix E Monitoring Locations for Impact Monitoring
Appendix F Event and Action Plan
Appendix G Graphical Plots for Monitoring
Result
Appendix H Weather information
Appendix I Waste Flow Table
Appendix J Implementation Schedule for
Environmental Mitigation Measures
1.1.1. Civil Engineering and Development Department is the Project Proponent and the Permit Holder of Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE)
Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works, which is
a Designated Project to be implemented under Environmental Permit number EP-404/2011/C granted on 12 March 2015.
1.1.2. The Project consists of two main
components: Construction of a Boundary Control Point (hereinafter referred as
¡§BCP¡¨); and Construction of a connecting road alignment. Layout plan of the Project is shown in Appendix A.
1.1.3. The proposed BCP is located at the
boundary with Shenzhen near the existing Chuk Yuen Village, comprising a main
passenger building with passenger and cargo processing facilities and the
associated customs, transport and ancillary facilities. The connecting road alignment consists
of six main sections:
1)
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area (FCA) Boundary ¡V this section
comprises at-grade and viaducts and includes the improvement works at Lin Ma
Hang Road;
2)
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan ¡V this section
stretches from the Frontier Closed Area Boundary to the tunnel portal at Cheung
Shan and comprises at-grade and viaducts including an interchange at Ping
Yeung;
3)
North Tunnel ¡V this section comprises the tunnel segment at Cheung Shan
and includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel;
4)
Sha Tau Kok Road ¡V this section stretches from the tunnel portal at Wo Keng Shan to the tunnel portal south of Loi Tung and
comprises at-grade and viaducts including an interchange at Sha Tau Kok and an
administration building;
5)
South Tunnel ¡V this section comprises a tunnel segment that stretches from
Loi Tung to Fanling and includes a ventilation building at the portals on
either end of the tunnel as well as a ventilation building in the middle of the
tunnel near Lau Shui Heung;
6)
Fanling ¡V this section comprises the at-grade, viaducts and interchange
connection to the existing Fanling Highway.
1.1.4.
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting has been commissioned as an Independent ET to implement the
relevant EM&A program in accordance
with the approved EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties.
1.1.5. This is the 10th Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
for the ¡§Liantang/Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works¡¨ under Environmental Permit No. EP-404/2011/C, covering the period from 1 November 2015 to 31 January 2016.
1.2.1
The Monthly Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) Report is structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Project Organization and
Construction progress
Section 3 Summary of Impact monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air Quality Monitoring
Section 5 Construction Noise
Monitoring
Section 6 Water Quality Monitoring
Section 7 Waste Management
Section 8 Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
Section 9 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 10 Conclusions and Recommendations
2.1.1
To facilitate the project management and
implementation, the Project would be divided by the following contracts:
¡P
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
¡P
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
¡P
Contract 4 (TCSS)
¡P
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
¡P
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
¡P
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
¡P
ArchSD Contract No. SS
C505
2.1.2
The
details of each contracts is summarized below and the delineation of each contracts is shown in Appendix A.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.1.3
Contract 2 has awarded in December 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 19 May 2014. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 2 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
an approximately 5.2km long dual two-lane connecting road (with about 0.4km of
at-grade road and 4.8km of tunnel) connecting the Fanling Interchange with the
proposed Sha Tau Kok Interchange;
¡P
construction of a
ventilation adit tunnel and the mid-ventilation
building;
¡P
construction of
the north and south portal buildings of the Lung Shan Tunnel and their
associated slope works;
¡P
provision and
installation of ventilation system, E&M works and building services works
for Lung Shan tunnel and Cheung Shan tunnel and their portal buildings;
¡P
construction of
Tunnel Administration Building adjacent to Wo Keng
Shan Road and the associated E&M and building services works; and
¡P
construction of
associated footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage,
waterworks, landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.1.4
Contract 3 was awarded in July 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 5 November 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 3 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
four link roads connecting the existing Fanling Highway and the south portal of
the Lung Shan Tunnel;
¡P
realignment of
the existing Tai Wo Service Road West and Tai Wo Service Road East;
¡P
widening of the
existing Fanling Highway (HyD¡¦s
entrustment works);
¡P
demolishing
existing Kiu Tau vehicular bridge and Kiu Tau footbridge and reconstruction of
the existing Kiu Tau Footbridge (HyD¡¦s entrustment
works); and
¡P
construction of
associated footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage,
waterworks, landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.1.5
The works of Contract 4 are scheduled to commence
in the 3rd quarter of 2015.
The work of this Contract includes
provision and installation of Traffic Control and Surveillance System and the
associated electrical and mechanical works for the Project.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.1.6
Contract 5 has awarded in April 2013 and
construction work was commenced in August 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 5 is
listed below:
¡P
site formation of about 23
hectares of land for the development of the BCP;
¡P
construction of an
approximately 1.6 km long perimeter road at the BCP including a 175m long
depressed road;
¡P
associated
diversion/modification works at existing local roads and junctions including
Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
construction of pedestrian
subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
provision of resite area with supporting infrastructure for reprovisioning of the affected village houses; and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.1.7
Contract 6 was awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was expected to be commenced on 23 October 2015. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 6
will be included below:
construction of an approximately 4.6km long dual two-lane connecting
road (with about 0.6km of at-grade road, 3.3km of viaduct and 0.7km of tunnel)
connecting the BCP with the proposed Sha Tau Kok Road Interchange and the
associated ventilation buildings;
associated diversion/modification works at access roads to the resite of Chuk Yuen Village;
provision of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities for
the BCP and the resite of Chuk
Yuen Village;
construction of a pedestrian subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang
Road;
provisioning of the affected facilities including Wo Keng Shan Road garden; and
construction of
associated footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage,
waterworks, landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.1.8
Contract 7 has awarded in December 2015 and
the construction works of Contract 7 will tentatively commence in February 2016.
Major Scope of Work of the Contract
7 would be included below:
construction of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) portion of four vehicular bridge
construction of one pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen (SZ) River
(cross boundary bridges)
ArchSD Contract No. SS C505
2.1.9
SS C505 has been awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. Major Scope of Work of the SS C505 would
be included below:
passenger-related facilities including
processing kiosks and examination facilities for private cars and coaches,
passenger clearance building and halls, the interior fitting works for the
pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen River, etc.;
cargo processing facilities including kiosks
for clearance of goods vehicles, customs inspection platforms, X-ray building,
etc.;
accommodation for the facilities inside of the
Government departments providing services in connection with the BCP;
transport-related facilities inside the BCP
including road networks, public transport interchange, transport drop-off and
pick-up areas, vehicle holding areas and associated road furniture etc;
a public carpark; and
other ancillary
facilities such as sewerage and drainage, building services provisions and
electronic systems, associated environmental mitigation measure and landscape
works.
2.2.1
The project organization is shown in Appendix B. The responsibilities of respective parties are:
Civil
Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)
2.2.2
CEDD is the Project Proponent and the Permit Holder of the EP of the development
of the Project and will assume overall responsibility for the project. An
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) shall be employed by CEDD to audit the
results of the EM&A works carried out by the ET.
Architectural
Services Department (ArchSD)
2.2.3
ArchSD acts as the works agent for
Development Bureau (DEVB), for Contract SS C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen Wai
Boundary Control Point (BCP) ¡V BCP Buildings and Associated Facilities.
Environmental
Protection Department (EPD)
2.2.4
EPD is the statutory enforcement body for
environmental protection matters in Hong Kong.
Ronald Lu
& Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd (The Architect)
2.2.5
Ronald Lu & Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd is
appointed by ArchSD as an Architect for Contract SS C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen
Wai Boundary Control Point (BCP) ¡V BCP Buildings and Associated
Facilities. It responsible for overseeing
the construction works of Contract SS C505 and for ensuring that the works are
undertaken by the Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract
requirements. The duties and responsibilities of the Architect with respect to
EM&A are:
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with contract
specifications, including the implementation and operation of the environmental
mitigation measures and their effectiveness
Monitor Contractors¡¦ and ET¡¦s compliance with
the requirements in the Environmental Permit (EP) and EM&A Manual
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the EM&A
programme
Participate in joint site inspection by the ET
and IEC
Oversee the implementation of the agreed Event
/ Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project discussing regarding the
cumulative impact issues.
Engineer
or Engineers Representative (ER)
2.2.6
The ER is responsible for overseeing the
construction works and for ensuring that the works are undertaken by the
Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract requirements. The
duties and responsibilities of the ER with respect to EM&A are:
¡P
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the
environmental mitigation measures and their effectiveness
¡P
Monitor Contractors¡¦s,
ET¡¦s and IEC¡¦s compliance with the requirements in the Environmental Permit
(EP) and EM&A Manual
¡P
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the
EM&A programme
¡P
Participate in joint site inspection by the
ET and IEC
¡P
Oversee the implementation of the agreed
Event / Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s Regulaiton of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project
discussing regarding the cumulative impact issues.
The
Contractor(s)
2.2.7
There will be one contractor for each
individual works contract. The
Contractor(s) should report to the ER. The duties and responsibilities of the
Contractor are:
¡P
Comply with the relevant contract conditions
and specifications on environmental protection
¡P
Employ an Environmental Team (ET) to
undertake monitoring, laboratory analysis and reporting of EM &A Facilitate
ET¡¦s monitoring and site inspection activities
¡P
Participate in the site inspections by the ET
and IEC, and undertake any corrective actions
¡P
Provide information / advice to the ET
regarding works programme and activities which may contribute to the generation
of adverse environmental impacts
¡P
Submit proposals on mitigation measures in
case of exceedances of Action and Limit levels in accordance with the Event /
Action Plans
¡P
Implement measures to reduce impact where
Action and Limit levels are exceeded
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Environmental Team (ET)
2.2.8
One ET will be employed for this Project. The ET shall not be in any way an
associated body of the Contractor(s), and shall be employed by the Project
Proponent/Contractor to conduct the EM&A programme. The ET should be managed by the ET
Leader. The ET Leader shall be a person who has at least 7 years¡¦ experience in
EM&A and has relevant professional qualifications. Suitably qualified staff
should be included in the ET, and resources for the implementation of the
EM&A programme should be allocated in time under the Contract(s), to enable
fulfillment of the Project¡¦s EM&A requirements as specified in the EM&A
Manual during construction of the Project. The ET shall report to the Project
Proponent and the duties shall include:
¡P
Monitor and audit various environmental
parameters as required in this EM&A Manual
¡P
Analyse the
environmental monitoring and audit data, review the success of EM&A
programme and the adequacy of mitigation measures implemented, confirm the
validity of the EIA predictions and identify any adverse environmental impacts
arising
¡P
Carry out regular site inspection to
investigate and audit the Contractors¡¦ site practice, equipment/plant and work
methodologies with respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation,
and effect proactive action to pre-empt problems
¡P
Monitor compliance with conditions in the EP,
environmental protection, pollution prevention and control regulations and
contract specifications
¡P
Audit environmental conditions on site
¡P
Report on the environmental monitoring and
audit results to EPD, the ER, the lEC and Contractor(s) or their delegated representatives
¡P
Recommend suitable mitigation measures to the
Contractor in the case of exceedance of Action and Limit levels in accordance
with the Event and Action Plans
¡P
Liaise with the IEC on all environmental
performance matters and timely submit all relevant EM&A proforma
for approval by IEC
¡P
Advise the Contractor(s) on environmental
improvement, awareness, enhancement measures etc., on site
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, ET, lEC and the
Contractor(s) of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
2.2.9
One IEC will be employed for this Project. The Independent Environmental Checker
(IEC) should not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor(s) or the
ET for the Project. The IEC should
be employed by the Permit Holder (i.e., CEDD) prior to
the commencement of the construction of the Project. The IEC should have at least 10 years¡¦
experience in EM&A and have relevant professional qualifications. The duty of IEC should be:
¡P
Provide proactive advice to the ER and the
Project Proponent on EM&A matters related to the project, independent from
the management of construction works, but empowered to audit the environmental
performance of construction
¡P
Review and audit all aspects of the EM&A
programme implemented by the ET
¡P
Review and verify the monitoring data and all
submissions in connection with the EP and EM&A Manual submitted by the ET
¡P
Arrange and conduct regular, at least monthly
site inspections of the works during construction phase, and ad hoc inspections
if significant environmental problems are identified
¡P
Check compliance with the agreed Event /
Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Check compliance with the procedures for
carrying out complaint investigation
¡P
Check the effectiveness of corrective
measures
¡P
Feedback audit results to ET by signing off
relevant EM&A proforma
¡P
Check that the mitigation measures are
effectively implemented
¡P
Report the works conducted, the findings,
recommendation and improvement of the site inspections, after reviewing ET¡¦s
and Contractor¡¦s works, and advices to the ER and Project Proponent on a
monthly basis
¡P
Liaison with the client departments, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, lEC and the Contractor(s) of the
concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below regarding the cumulative
impact issues.
2.3.1
The concurrent construction works that may be
carried out include, but not limited to, the following:
(a)
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage IV;
(b)
Widening of Fanling Highway ¡V Tai Hang to Wo Hop Shek Interchange ¡V Contract No. HY/2012/06;
(c)
Construction of BCP facilities in Shenzhen.
2.4.1
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction activity conducted under the Project is located in Contracts 2, 3,
5, 6 and SS C505 and they are summarized in below. Moreover, the master construction program
of the Contract 2, Contract 3, Contract 5, Contract 6 and SS C505 are enclosed
in Appendix C. For Contract 7, construction activities
were scheduled to commence in February 2016 and therefore no construction
activities was undertaken in the Reporting Period.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.4.2
Construction work of Contract 2 was commenced
on 19 May 2014, the following activities were conducted in the Reporting
Period.
Mid-Vent Portal |
Cavern excavation
Tube excavation (NB + SB) towards North
Portal
Adit invert
slab
Building works foundation
Installation of blast curtain |
North Portal |
Slope stabilization and retaining wall
Southbound tunnel door erection
Northbound top heading canopies
Northbound top heading excavation and
tunnel enlargement
Tunnel Boring Machine excavation and
initial drive |
South Portal |
Southbound and Northbound Drill and Blast
excavation
Building works foundation and substructure |
Admin
Building |
Building works foundation |
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.4.3
Contract commenced in November 2013, the
following activities were conducted in the Reporting Period.
Cable
detection and trial trenches
Decking
construction for Bridge E
E&M
work for new valve control & Telemetry House
Filling
works at Tong Hang East
Storm
drain laying
Noise
barrier construction
Pier /
pier table construction
Pile cap
works
Piling
works
Portal
beam construction
Pre-drilling
Road works
at Fanling Highway
Retaining
Wall construction
Socket
H-pile installation
Tree
felling works
Utilities
duct laying
Viaduct
segment erection
Portal
beam construction
Slope
works
Water
works
Sewer
works
FRP Lining
on existing water main
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.4.4
The contract has not yet awarded.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.4.5
Contract commenced in August 2013, the
following activities were conducted in the Reporting Period.
Construction
of rising main at existing Lin Ma Hang (LMH) Road
Drainage
works at Road L15
Diversion
of Underground Utility (UU) at existing LMH Road
Construction
of secondary boundary fencing
Filling
and drainage works for ArchSD permanent office
Construction
of Depressed Road at BCP3
Additional
works (Access Works) for Village House at RS4
Drainage
works at existing/proposed LMH Road
Brick
laying at footpath of proposed LMH road
Irrigation
at proposed LMH Road
Formation
works at BCPB Area
Installation
of UU at proposed and existing LMH road
Road works
(kerb laying) for proposed and existing LMH road and L15 Road
Irrigation
system at proposed and existing LMH Road
Water
works at existing LMH Road
Bituminous
laying at existing & proposed LMH road and L15 Road
Construction
of Pavilion at Chung Yuen Ha Village
Preparation
works for planting at proposed LMH road
Remaining
formation works at BCPB Area
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.4.6
Contract 6 has awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. In this Reporting Period,
construction activities conducted are listed below:
Site
Clearance
Slope
Works
Site
Accesses Construction
Ground
Investigation (GI) Works
Soil nail
Bored
piling
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.4.7
Construction works of Contract 7 did not
commence in the reporting period
Contract SS C505
2.4.8
Contract SS C505 has awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
Excavation
& fill works
Predrilling
Pre-boring
Percussive
piling
Pile caps
Site
office set-up
Structural
works
Bored
piling
Assembly
of crawler crane
Site
office / training centre set-up
Mock up
for curtain wall
Weighbridge
works
Construction
of Prototype A
2.5.1
In according to the EP, the required
documents have submitted to EPD for retention which listed in below:
Project
Layout Plans of Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and SS C505
Landscape
Plan
Topsoil
Management Plan
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Programme
Baseline
Monitoring Report (TCS00690/13/600/R0030v3) for the Project
Waste
Management Plan of the Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and SS C505
Contamination
Assessment Plan (CAP) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi Tung and the workshops in Fanling
Contamination
Assessment Report (CAR) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi Tung and the workshops in Fanling
Vegetation
Survey Report
Woodland
Compensation Plan
Habitat
Creation Management Plan
Wetland
Compensation Plan
2.5.2
Summary of
the relevant permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for the Project of each contracts are presented in Table 2-1.
Table
2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Item |
Description |
License/Permit
Status |
||||
Ref.
no. |
Effective Date |
Expiry Date |
||||
Contract 2 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref No.: 368864 |
31 Dec 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
North Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-652-D2523-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||
Mid-Vent Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2524-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||
South Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2526-01 |
9 Apr 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.WT00018374-2014 |
3 Mar 2014 |
28 Feb 2019 |
||
No.: W5/1I389 |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||
No.: W5/1I390 |
19 June 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||
No.: W5/1I391 |
28 Mar 2014 |
17 Dec 2015 |
||||
No. WT00023063-2015 (Variation of
W5/1I391) |
18 Dec 2015 |
31-Mar -2019 |
||||
No.: W5/1I392 |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7019105 |
8 Jan 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0304-15 |
19 May 2015 |
14 Nov 2015 |
||
GW-RN0468-15 |
29 Aug 2015 |
28 Nov 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0467-15 |
23 Aug 2015 |
22 Nov 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0479-15 |
31 Jul 2015 |
29 Jan 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0562-15 |
7 Sep 2015 |
6 Dec 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0606-15 |
25 Sep 2015 |
24 Nov 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0678-15 |
1 Nov 2015 |
31 Jan 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0718-15 |
25 Nov 2015 |
24 Jan 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0724-15 |
17 Nov 2015 |
16 Dec 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0738-15 |
18 Nov 2015 |
8 May 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0760-15 |
26 Nov 2015 |
27 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0761-15 |
28 Nov 2015 |
27 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0795-15 |
7 Dec 2015 |
6 Jun 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0838-15 |
24-Dec-2015 |
23-Feb-2016 |
||||
GW-RN0875-15 |
24-Dec-2015 |
23-Feb-2016 |
||||
GW-RN0893-15 |
01-Jan-2016 |
27-Jun-2016 |
||||
Contract 3 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 362101 |
17 Jul 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number: No.:5113-634-C3817-01 |
7 Oct 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.:WT00016832 ¡V 2013 |
28 Aug 13 |
31 Aug 2018 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017914 |
2 Aug 13 |
Till Contract ends |
||
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0334-15 |
8 Jun 2015 |
7 Dec 2015 |
||
GW-RN0428-15 |
9 Ju1 2015 |
31 Dec 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0473-15 |
29 Jul 2015 |
17 Dec 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0461-15 |
5 Aug 2015 |
8 Jan 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0495-15 |
12 Aug 2015 |
11 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0497-15 |
14 Aug 2015 |
13 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0488-15 |
6 Sep 2015 |
22 Nov 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0525-15 |
29 Aug 2015 |
13 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0542-15 |
1 Sep 2015 |
25 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0608-15 |
28 Sep 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0633-15 |
15 Oct 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0655-15 |
1 Dec 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0677-15 |
26 Oct 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0699-15 |
10 Nov 2015 |
27 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0695-15 |
29 Nov 2015 |
28 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0712-15 |
16 Nov 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0736-15 |
24 Nov 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0765-15 |
1 Dec 2015 |
27 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0812-15 |
20 Dec 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0837-15 |
23 Dec 2015 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0892-15 |
9 Jan 2016 |
8 July 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0894-15 |
5 Jan 2016 |
27 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0001-16 |
8 Jan 2016 |
27 Feb 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0049-16 |
26 Jan 2016 |
29 Feb 2016 |
||||
Contract 5 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 359338 |
13 May 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-642-S3735-01 |
8 Jun 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: W5/1G44/1 |
8 Jun 13 |
30 Jun 2018 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017351 |
29 Apr 13 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
Contract 6 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390614 |
29 Jun 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-652-C3969-01 |
31 Aug 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Waste Disposal
Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022707 |
9 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
4 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
Application is under
consideration by EPD |
||||
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0681-15 |
26 Oct 2015 |
25 Apr 2016 |
||
6 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0683-15 |
26 Oct 2015 |
25 Apr 2016 |
||
Contract SS C505 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390974 |
13 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5213-642-L1048-07 |
16 Sep 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
Licence No.: WT00022774-2015 |
17 Nov 2015 |
30 Nov 2020 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022831 |
23 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
PP-RN0027-15 |
5 Oct 2015 |
2 Apr 2016 |
||
PP-RN0032-15 |
23 Nov 2015 |
22 Jan 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0602-15 |
23 Sep 2015 |
5 Nov 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0688-15 |
6 Nov 2015 |
26 Nov 2015 |
||||
GW-RN0768-15 |
27 Nov 2015 |
22 Jan 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0865-15 |
23 Dec 2015 |
22 Jan 2016 |
||||
PP-RN0002-16 |
23 Jan 2016 |
22 Mar 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0023-16 |
23 Jan 2016 |
22 Mar 2016 |
||||
3.1.1
The Environmental Monitoring and Audit
requirements are set out in the Approved EM&A manual. Environmental issues
such as air quality, construction noise and water quality were identified as
the key issues during the construction phase of the Project.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the
sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The EM&A program of construction phase
monitoring shall cover the following environmental issues:
•
Air quality;
•
Construction noise; and
•
Water quality
3.2.2
A summary of the monitoring parameters is
presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Environmental
Issue |
Parameters |
Air
Quality |
1-hour
TSP by Real-Time Portable Dust Meter; and 24-hour
TSP by High Volume Air Sampler. |
Noise |
Leq(30min) in normal working days (Monday to
Saturday) 07:00-19:00 except public holiday; and 3 sets
of consecutive Leq(5min) on
restricted hours i.e. 19:00 to 07:00 next day, and whole day of public
holiday or Sunday Supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and
L90 shall also be obtained for reference. |
Water
Quality |
In-situ
Measurements Dissolved
Oxygen Concentration (mg/L); Dissolved
Oxygen Saturation (% ); Turbidity
(NTU); pH unit; Water
depth (m); and Temperature
(¢J). |
Laboratory Analysis Suspended
Solids (mg/L) |
3.3.1
The designated monitoring locations as
recommended in the EM&A Manual
are shown in Appendix D.
As the access to some of the designated monitoring locations was
questionable due to safety reason or denied by the landlords, alternative
locations therefore have had proposed. The proposed alternative monitoring
locations has updated in the revised EM&A Programme which verified by IEC
and certified by ET Leader prior submitted to EPD on 10 July 2013. Table 3-2, Table 3-3 and Table
3-4 are respectively listed the air quality, construction noise and
water quality monitoring locations for the Project and a map showing these
monitoring stations is presented in Appendix E.
Table
3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
AM1a* |
Garden Farm, Tsung Yuen Ha Village |
BCP |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
AM2 |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang
Road |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
AM3 |
Ta Kwu Ling Fire Service Station
of Ta Kwu Ling Village. |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
AM4b^ |
House no. 10B1 Nga Yiu Ha Village |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 6 |
AM5a^ |
Ping Yeung Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM6 |
Wo Keng
Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM7b@ |
Loi Tung
Village House |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
AM8 |
Po Kat Tsai Village No. 4 |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
AM9b# |
Nam Wa
Po Village House No. 80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM9a to AM9b was submitted to EPD on 4 Nov 2013 after
verified by the IEC and it was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (15) in EP
2/N7/A/52 Pt.10 dated 8 Nov 2013).
* Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM1to AM1a was submitted to EPD on 24 March 2014 after
verified by the IEC. It was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (6) in EP 2/N7/A/52
Pt.12 dated 9 Jun 2014).
@ Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM7a to AM7b was submitted to EPD on 4 June 2014 after
verified by the IEC. It was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (7) in EP 2/N7/A/52
Pt.12 dated 9 Jun 2014).
Table
3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
NM1 |
Tsung Yuen Ha Village House No. 63 |
BCP |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
NM2 |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang Road |
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
NM3 |
Ping Yeung Village House (facade facing northeast) |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM4 |
Wo Keng Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM5 |
Village House, Loi Tung |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM6 |
Tai Tong Wu Village House 2 |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM7 |
Po Kat Tsai Village |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
NM8 |
Village House, Tong Hang |
Fanling |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
NM9 |
Village House, Kiu Tau Village |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
NM10 |
Nam Wa Po Village House No.
80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
Table
3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Coordinates of Designated / Alternative Location |
Nature of the location |
Related to the Work Contract |
|
WM1 |
Downstream of Kong Yiu
Channel |
833 679 |
845 421 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 51m of the designated location |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
WM1- Control |
Upstream of Kong Yiu
Channel |
834 185 |
845 917 |
NA |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
WM2A |
Downstream of River
Ganges |
834 204 |
844 471 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 81m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2A- Control |
Upstream of River
Ganges |
835 270 |
844 243 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 78m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2B |
Downstream of River
Ganges |
835 433 |
843 397 |
NA |
Contract 6 |
WM2B- Control |
Upstream of River
Ganges |
835 835 |
843 351 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 31m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM3 |
Downstream of River
Indus |
836 324 |
842 407 |
NA |
Contract 2# Contract 6 |
WM3- Control |
Upstream of River
Indus |
836 763 |
842 400 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 26m of the designated location |
Contract 2# Contract 6 |
WM4 |
Downstream of Ma Wat
Channel |
833 850 |
838 338 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 11m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control A |
Kau Lung Hang Stream |
834 028 |
837 695 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 28m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control B |
Upstream of Ma Wat
Channel |
833760 |
837395 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 15m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
Remark:
# updated since Contract 6 commenced on 23 October 2016.
3.4.1
The requirements of
impact monitoring are stipulated in Sections
2.1.6, 3.1.5 and 4.1.6 of the
approved EM&A Manual and
presented as follows.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.4.2
Frequency of impact
air quality monitoring is as follows:
1-hour TSP |
3 times every six
days during course of works |
24-hour TSP |
Once every 6 days during course of works. |
Noise Monitoring
3.4.3
One set of Leq(30min) as 6 consecutive Leq(5min) between 0700-1900 hours on
normal weekdays and once every week during course of works. If construction work necessary to carry
out at other time periods, i.e. restricted time period (19:00 to 07:00 the next
morning and whole day on public holidays) (hereinafter referred as ¡§the
restricted hours¡¨), 3 consecutive Leq(5min) measurement will depended CNP requirements to
undertake. Supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results such as
L10 and L90 shall also be obtained for reference.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.4.4
The water quality monitoring frequency shall
be 3 days per week during course of works.
The interval between two sets of monitoring shall not be less than 36
hours.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.5.1
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. If the ET proposes to use a direct
reading dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP levels, it shall submit sufficient
information to the IEC to approve.
3.5.2
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement shall be determined by HOKLAS
accredited laboratory.
3.5.3
All equipment to be used for air quality
monitoring is listed in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-Hour
TSP |
|
High
Volume Air Sampler |
TISCH
High Volume Air Sampler, HVS Model TE-5170 |
Calibration
Kit |
TISCH
Model TE-5025A |
1-Hour TSP |
|
Portable Dust Meter |
Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass
Profiler & Counter |
Wind Data
Monitoring Equipment
3.5.4
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
wind data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging
wind speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location shall
be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
1)
The wind sensors should be installed 10 m
above ground so that they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by
buildings.
2)
The wind data should be captured by a data
logger. The data shall be downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
3)
The wind data monitoring equipment should be
re-calibrated at least once every six months.
4)
Wind direction should be divided into 16
sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
3.5.5
ET has liaised with the landlords of the
successful granted HVS installation premises. However, the owners rejected to provide
premises for wind data monitoring equipment installation.
3.5.6
Under this situation, the ET proposed
alternative methods to obtain representative wind data. Meteorological information as extracted
from ¡§the Hong Kong Observatory Ta Kwu Ling Station¡¨ is alternative method to
obtain representative wind data.
For Ta Kwu Ling Station, it is located nearby the Project site. Moreover, this station is located at 15m
above mean sea level while its anemometer is located at 13m above the existing
ground which in compliance with the general setting up requirement. Furthermore, this station also can be to
provide the humidity, rainfall, and air pressure and temperature etc.
meteorological information. In Hong
Kong of a lot development projects, weather information extracted from Hong
Kong Observatory is common alternative method if weather station installation
not allowed.
Noise Monitoring
3.5.7
Sound level meter in compliance with the
International Electrotechnical Commission
Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be
used for carrying out the noise monitoring. The sound level meter shall be checked
using an acoustic calibrator. The
wind speed shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of
measuring the wind speed in m s-1.
3.5.8
Noise monitoring equipment to be used for
monitoring is listed in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
B&K
Type 2238 or Rion NL-14 or Rion
NL-31or Rion NL-52 |
Calibrator |
B&K
Type 4231 |
Portable Wind Speed Indicator |
Testo Anemometer |
3.5.9
Sound level meters listed above comply with
the International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications, as recommended in TM issued
under the NCO. The acoustic
calibrator and sound level meter to be used in the impact monitoring will be
calibrated yearly.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.5.10 DO and water temperature should be measured in-situ by a DO/temperature
meter. The instrument should be portable and weatherproof using a DC power source.
It should have a membrane electrode
with automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. The equipment
should be capable of measuring:
•
DO level in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200%
saturation; and
•
temperature of between 0 and 45 degree
Celsius.
3.5.11 A portable pH meter capable of measuring a range between 0.0 and 14.0
should be provided to measure pH under the specified conditions accordingly to
the APHA Standard Methods.
3.5.12 The instrument should be portable and weatherproof using a DC power
source. It should have a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity
between 0-1000 NTU.
3.5.13 A
portable, battery-operated echo sounder or tape measure will be used for the
determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station as
appropriate.
3.5.14 A water
sampler e.g. Kahlsico Water Sampler, which is a
transparent PVC cylinder with capacity not less than 2 litres, will be used for
water sampling if water depth over than 0.5m. For sampling from very shallow
water depths e.g. <0.5 m, water sample collection will be directly from
water surface below 100mm use sampling plastic bottle to avoid inclusion of
bottom sediment or humus. Moreover,
Teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling buckets maybe used for
water sampling. The equipment used
for sampling will be depended the sampling location and depth situations.
3.5.15 Water
samples for laboratory measurement of SS will be collected in high density
polythene bottles, packed in ice (cooled to 4 ºC without being frozen), and
delivered to the laboratory in the same day as the samples were collected.
3.5.16 Analysis
of suspended solids should be carried out in a HOKLAS or other accredited
laboratory. Water samples of about 1L should be collected at the monitoring
stations for carrying out the laboratory suspended solids determination. The SS determination work should start
within 24 hours after collection of the water samples. The SS analyses should
follow the APHA Standard Methods 2540D
with Limit of Reporting of 2 mg/L.
3.5.17 Water
quality monitoring equipment used in the impact monitoring is listed in Table
3-7. Suspended solids (SS) analysis is
carried out by a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory, namely ALS Technichem
(HK) Pty Ltd.
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Depth Detector |
Eagle Sonar or tape
measures |
Water
Sampler |
A
2-litre transparent PVC cylinder with latex cups at both ends or teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling
bucket |
Thermometer
& DO meter |
YSI
Professional Plus / YSI 6820/650MDS / YSI PRO20 Handheld Dissolved Oxygen
Instrument / YSI 550A Multifunctional Meter |
pH meter |
AZ8685 pH pen-style
meter / YSI Professional Plus / YSI 6820/650MDS |
Turbidimeter |
Hach 2100Q |
Sample
Container |
High
density polythene bottles (provided by laboratory) |
Storage Container |
¡¥Willow¡¦ 33-liter plastic cool box with Ice
pad |
1-hour TSP Monitoring
3.6.1
The 1-hour TSP monitor was a brand named ¡§Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass Profiler
& Counter¡¨ which is a portable, battery-operated laser photometer. The 1-hour TSP meter provides a real
time 1-hour TSP measurement based on 90o light scattering. The 1-hour TSP monitor consists of the
following:
(a.)
A pump to draw sample aerosol through the
optic chamber where TSP is measured;
(b.)
A sheath air system to isolate the aerosol in
the chamber to keep the optics clean for maximum reliability; and
(c.)
A built-in data logger compatible with
Windows based program to facilitate data collection, analysis and reporting.
3.6.2
The 1-hour TSP meter is used within the valid
period as follow manufacturer¡¦s Operation and Service Manual.
3.6.3
The equipment used for 24-hour TSP
measurement is Tisch
Environmental, Inc. Model TE-5170 TSP high volume air sampling system, which complied with EPA Code of Federal Regulation, Appendix B
to Part 50. The High Volume Air Sampler (HVS) consists of the following:
(a.)
An anodized aluminum shelter;
(b.)
A 8¡¨x10¡¨ stainless steel filter holder;
(c.)
A blower motor assembly;
(d.)
A continuous flow/pressure recorder;
(e.)
A motor speed-voltage control/elapsed time
indicator;
(f.)
A 7-day mechanical timer, and
(g.)
A power supply of 220v/50 Hz
3.6.4
The HVS is operated and calibrated on a
regular basis in accordance with the manufacturer¡¦s instruction using Tisch Calibration Kit Model TE-5025A. Calibration would carry out in two month
interval.
3.6.5
24-hour TSP is collected by the ET on filters
of HVS and quantified by a local HOKLAS accredited laboratory, ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd (ALS), upon receipt of the
samples. The ET keep all the
sampled 24-hour TSP filters in normal air conditioned room conditions, i.e. 70%
RH (Relative Humidity) and 25oC, for six months prior to disposal.
3.6.6
Noise measurements were taken in terms of the
A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level (Leq)
measured in decibels dB(A). Supplementary statistical results (L10
and L90) were also obtained for reference.
3.6.7
During
the monitoring, all noise measurements were performed with the meter set to
FAST response and on the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level
(Leq). Leq(30min)
in six consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
were used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700-1900
hours on weekdays; and also Leq(15min) in
three consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
is used as monitoring parameter for other time periods (e.g. during restricted
hours), if necessary.
3.6.8
Prior
of noise measurement, the accuracy of the sound level meter is checked using an
acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. The checking was
performed before and after the noise measurement.
Water Quality
3.6.9
Water
quality monitoring is conducted at the designated locations. The sampling
produce with the in-situ monitoring are presented as below:
Sampling Procedure
3.6.10 A Digital Global Positioning System (GPS) is used to identify the
designated monitoring stations prior to water sampling. A portable, battery-operated echo
sounder is used for the determination of water depth at each station. At each station, water sample would be
collected from 0.1m below water surface or the water surface to prevent the
river bed sediment for stirring.
3.6.11 The sample
container will be rinsed with a portion of the water sample. The water sample then will be
transferred to the high-density polythene
bottles as provided by the laboratory, labeled with a unique sample
number and sealed with a screw cap.
3.6.12 Before sampling,
general information such as the date and time of sampling, weather condition as
well as the personnel responsible for the monitoring would be recorded on the
field data sheet.
3.6.13 A ¡¥Willow¡¦
33-liter plastic cool box packed with ice will be used to preserve the water
samples prior to arrival at the laboratory for chemical determination. The water temperature of the cool box is
maintained at a temperature as close to 40C as possible without
being frozen. Samples collected are
delivered to the laboratory upon collection.
In-situ Measurement
3.6.14 Instrument
including YSI Professional Plus or YSI 6820/650MDS or YSI PRO20 Handheld
Dissolved Oxygen Instrument or YSI 550A Multifunctional Meter is used for water in-situ measures,
which automates the measurements and data logging of temperature, dissolved
oxygen and dissolved oxygen saturation.
Before each round of monitoring, the
dissolved oxygen probe would be calibrated by the wet bulb method.
3.6.15 A portable AZ8685
pH pen-style meter or YSI Professional Plus or YSI 6820/650MDS is used for in-situ
pH measurement. The pH meter is
capable of measuring pH in the range of 0 ¡V 14 and readable to 0.1.
3.6.16 A portable Hach 2100Q Turbidimeter or YSI Professional Plus or YSI
6820/650MDS is used for in-situ turbidity measurement. The
turbidity meter is capable of measuring turbidity in the range of 0 ¡V 1000 NTU. StablCal®
Standards of known NTU are used for calibration of the
instrument before and after measurement.
3.6.17 All
in-situ measurement equipment are calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of
three month interval.
Laboratory Analysis
3.6.18 All water samples are analyzed
with Suspended Solids (SS) as specified in the
EM&A Manual by a local HOKLAS-accredited testing laboratory (ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd HOKLAS registration no. 66).
SS analysis is
determined by the laboratory upon receipt of the water samples using APHA Standard Methods 2540D (namely ALS Method EA-025 as
accredited HOKLAS Scheme) started within 48
hours of water sample receipt.
3.7.1
Calibration of the HVS is performed upon
installation and thereafter at bimonthly intervals in accordance with the
manufacturer¡¦s instruction using the certified standard calibrator (TISCH Model
TE-5025A).
Moreover, the Calibration Kit would be
calibrated annually. The calibration data are properly documented and the
records are maintained by ET for future reference.
3.7.2
The 1-hour TSP
meter was calibrated by the supplier prior to purchase. Zero response of the equipment would be checked
before and after each monitoring event.
Annually calibration with the High Volume Sampler (HVS) in same
condition would be undertaken by the Laboratory.
3.7.3
The sound level
meter and calibrator are calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under
HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme at yearly basis.
3.7.4
All water quality monitoring equipment is
calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month intervals.
3.7.5
The calibration certificates of all
monitoring equipment used for the impact monitoring program in the Reporting
Period and the HOKLAS accredited certificate of laboratory are presented in
the relevant monthly EM&A reports.
3.8.1
The baseline results form the basis for
determining the environmental acceptance criteria for the impact
monitoring. According to the
approved Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual, the air quality,
construction noise and water quality criteria were set up, namely Action and
Limit levels are listed in Tables 3-8, 3-9 and 3-10.
Table 3-8 Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (mg /m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
||
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
|
AM1/ AM1a |
265 |
143 |
500 |
260 |
AM2 |
268 |
149 |
||
AM3 |
269 |
145 |
||
AM4a / AM4b |
267 |
148 |
||
AM5 / AM5a |
268 |
143 |
||
AM6 |
269 |
148 |
||
AM7a / AM7b |
275 |
156 |
||
AM8 |
269 |
144 |
||
AM9a / AM9b |
271 |
151 |
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Monitoring Location |
Action Level |
Limit Level in dB(A) |
Time Period: 0700-1900 hours on normal
weekdays |
||
NM1, NM2, NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8,
NM9, NM10 |
When one or more documented complaints are
received |
75 dB(A)Note 1 & Note 2 |
Note 1: Acceptable Noise Levels for school should be reduced to 70 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) during examination period
Note 2: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the NCA have to be followed.
Table 3-10 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameter |
Performance criteria |
Monitoring Location |
|||||
WM1 |
WM2A |
WM2B |
WM3 |
WM4 |
|||
DO
(mg/L) |
Action Level |
(*)4.23 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.74 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.14 |
|
Limit Level |
(#)4.19 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.60 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.08 |
||
Turbidity
(NTU) |
Action Level |
51.3 |
24.9 |
11.4 |
13.4 |
35.2 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of
the same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
67.6 |
33.8 |
12.3 |
14.0 |
38.4 |
||
AND
130% of upstream control
station of the same day |
|||||||
SS
(mg/L) |
Action Level |
54.5 |
14.6 |
11.8 |
12.6 |
39.4 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of the
same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
64.9 |
17.3 |
12.4 |
12.9 |
45.5 |
||
AND
130% of upstream control
station of the same day |
|||||||
Remarks: (*) The
Proposed Action Level of Dissolved Oxygen is adopted to be
used 5%-ile of baseline data (**) The Proposed Action & Limit Level of Dissolved Oxygen is used 4mg/L (#) The Proposed Limit Level of Dissolved Oxygen is adopted to be
used 1%-ile of baseline data |
|||||||
3.8.2
Should non-compliance of the environmental
quality criteria occurs, remedial actions will be triggered according to the
Event and Action Plan which presented in Appendix F.
3.9.1
All monitoring data will be handled by the ET¡¦s in-house data recording and management
system. The monitoring data recorded in the equipment
will be downloaded directly from the equipment at the end of each monitoring
day. The downloaded monitoring data
will input into a computerized database properly maintained by the ET. The laboratory results will be input
directly into the computerized database and checked by personnel other than
those who input the data.
3.9.2
For monitoring parameters that require
laboratory analysis, the local laboratory shall follow the QA/QC requirements
as set out under the HOKLAS scheme for the relevant laboratory tests.
4.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and Contract SS C505 and
air quality monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
4.2.1
In the Reporting Period, the 24-hour TSP
monitoring at AM3 on 27 November 2015 was failure due to malfunction of
HVS. After intense checking, it was
found that the motor of the HVS was damaged due to over-consuming and it has
been replaced on 2 December 2015.
The 24-hour TSP monitoring was resumed on 3 December 2015 following the
monitoring schedule.
4.2.2
Summary of air quality monitoring
results during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 4-1. The
relevant graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix G.
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Monitoring Location |
1-hour TSP (µg/m3) |
24-hour TSP (µg/m3) |
||||
Max |
Min |
Mean |
Max |
Min |
Mean |
|
AM1a |
251 |
11 |
84 |
94 |
27 |
54 |
Record Date |
30-Dec-15 |
16-Jan-16 |
48 events |
4-Nov-15 |
9-Dec-15 |
16 events |
AM2 |
245 |
30 |
78 |
148 |
25 |
76 |
Record Date |
30-Dec-15 |
20-Nov-15 |
48 events |
4-Nov-15 |
21-Jan-16 |
16 events |
AM3 |
190 |
32 |
83 |
139 |
23 |
69 |
Record Date |
24-Dec-15 |
28-Jan-16 |
48 events |
4-Jan-16 |
15-Dec-15 |
15 events |
AM4a |
184 |
35 |
86 |
105 |
22 |
56 |
Record Date |
14-Jan-16 |
8-Jan-16 |
45 events |
2-Jan-16 |
30-Jan-16 |
17 event |
AM5a |
179 |
15 |
82 |
137 |
26 |
57 |
Record Date |
14-Jan-16 |
8-Jan-16 |
45 events |
25-Nov-15 |
19-Nov-15 |
17 event |
AM6 |
239 |
40 |
88 |
145 |
48 |
103 |
Record Date |
5-Dec-15 |
23-Dec-15 |
45 events |
19-Jan-16 |
30-Jan-16 |
17 event |
AM7b |
253 |
45 |
107 |
89 |
29 |
53 |
Record Date |
23-Dec-15 |
4-Jan-16 |
45 events |
4-Nov-15 |
9-Dec-15 |
16 events |
AM8 |
222 |
39 |
98 |
83 |
17 |
40 |
Record Date |
23-Dec-15 |
4-Jan-16 |
45 events |
4-Nov-15 |
21-Dec-15 |
16 events |
AM9b |
228 |
14 |
98 |
115 |
20 |
59 |
Record Date |
24-Dec-15 |
11-Jan-16 |
48 events |
4-Nov-15 |
4-Jan-16 |
16 events |
4.2.3
Breaches of air quality A/L levels and
statistical analysis of compliance for the air quality monitoring results are
summarized in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Air Quality A/L Levels
Location |
Exceedance |
1-hour TSP |
24- hour TSP |
Total |
AM1 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM2 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM3 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM4a |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM5a |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM6 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM7b |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM8 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM9b |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.2.4
In the
Reporting Period, no exceedances were recorded for 1-hour and 24-hour TSP. No
corrective measures were therefore required.
4.2.5
The summary of weather conditions during the Reporting
Period is presented in Appendix H.
5.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and Contract SS C505 and
noise monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
5.2.1
The sound level meter was set in 1m from the
exterior of the building façade including noise monitoring locations NM1, NM2,
NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8 and NM9. No façade correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical principles and EPD
guidelines. However, free-field
status is performed at NM10 and façade correction (+3 dB(A) has added according
to the requirement.
5.2.2
Summary of noise monitoring results
during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 5-1. The
relevant graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix G.
Table 5-1 Summary of Construction Noise
Monitoring Results
Monitoring
Location |
Leq, 30min (dB((A)) |
|
Max |
Min |
|
NM1 |
71 |
53 |
Record Date |
22-Jan-16 |
11-Jan-16 |
NM2 |
71 |
60 |
Record Date |
22-Jan-16 |
9
& 14 & 26-Nov-15 |
NM3 |
70 |
56 |
Record Date |
4-Jan-16 |
30-Nov-15 |
NM4 |
75 |
63 |
Record Date |
4-Jan-16 |
12
& 24-Nov-15 |
NM5 |
68 |
52 |
Record Date |
12-Nov-15 |
11-Dec-15 |
NM6 |
63 |
53 |
Record Date |
14-Jan-16 |
23-Dec-15 |
NM7 |
67 |
58 |
Record Date |
20
& 26-Jan-16 |
4-Jan-16 |
NM8 |
64 |
53 |
Record Date |
14-Nov-15 |
24-Dec-15 |
NM9 |
66 |
52 |
Record Date |
16-Jan-16 |
8-Dec-15 |
NM10(*) |
78 |
61 |
Record Date |
14-Nov-15 |
9
& 26-Nov-15 |
(*) façade
correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical
principles and EPD guidelines
5.2.3
Breaches of construction noise A/L
levels and statistical analysis of compliance for construction noise monitoring
results are summarized in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Construction Noise A/L Levels
Station |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Received Date |
NM1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
NM2 |
0 |
||
NM3 |
0 |
||
NM4 |
0 |
||
NM5 |
0 |
||
NM6 |
0 |
||
NM7 |
0 |
||
NM8 |
0 |
||
NM9 |
0 |
||
NM10 |
1 |
5.2.4
In
this Reporting Period, one (1) Limit Level
exceedance was recorded at NM10 on 14 November 2015. NOE was issued to relevant parties upon
confirmation of the monitoring result. Furthermore, there were no noise complaints (Action Level
exceedance) received by the RE, Contractors or CEDD in the Reporting Period.
5.2.5
Investigation report for the cause of
exceedance was conducted by the ET and the result revealed that the exceedance was
caused by cumulated noise of the Contract and nearby construction activities of
other project. To minimize the
construction noise impact, The Contractor was advised to adopt good site
practice as mitigation measure as far as practicable.
6.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project has been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and Contract SS C505 and
water quality monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
6.2.1
Summary of monitoring results during the
Reporting Period are tabulated in Tables
6-1 and 6-4. The relevant
graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix G.
In accordance with ¡§Event
and Action Plan¡¨,
the water quality monitoring frequency shall be increased to daily when
exceedance recorded at the exceeded monitoring location. With effective from January 2016, one
(1) and seven (7) additional days water monitoring were
conducted at WM2A and WM2B respectively.
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 5
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
|
Min |
6.0 |
7.0 |
10.7 |
5.4 |
6.5 |
2.5 |
Max |
14.7 |
25.7 |
853.5 |
765.0 |
606.5 |
414.0 |
Average |
8.7 |
9.5 |
88.8 |
51.0 |
75.2 |
26.0 |
Table 6-2 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 3
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
||||||
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
|
Min |
8.0 |
3.8 |
6.8 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
4.5 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
6.8 |
Max |
66.4 |
49.3 |
46.4 |
56.5 |
27.5 |
76.0 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Average |
21.6 |
10.8 |
17.7 |
18.7 |
7.7 |
18.5 |
7.9 |
8.0 |
7.7 |
Table 6-3 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 6
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||||||||
WM2A |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
WM2A |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
WM2A |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
|
Min |
7.5 |
5.9 |
7.6 |
7.0 |
6.3 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
Max |
13.3 |
13.5 |
13.2 |
12.1 |
570.0 |
782.5 |
502.5 |
278.0 |
300.0 |
461.0 |
375.0 |
184.0 |
Average |
9.2 |
8.6 |
9.1 |
8.3 |
48.6 |
39.7 |
61.0 |
17.6 |
30.3 |
21.5 |
49.5 |
12.4 |
Table 6-4 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 6
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
|
Min |
6.7 |
5.7 |
4.4 |
4.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Max |
12.3 |
12.4 |
275.5 |
260.0 |
229.5 |
396.5 |
Average |
8.6 |
8.5 |
26.2 |
27.1 |
20.8 |
45.3 |
6.2.2
Breaches of water quality A/L levels and
statistical analysis of compliance for the water quality monitoring results are
summarized in Tables 6-5.
Table 6-5 Summaries
of Breaches of the Existing Water Quality A/L Levels
Reporting Period |
No. of sampling day |
Location |
DO (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
SS (mg/L) |
|||
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
|||
Nov-15 |
12 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
WM2A |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
|
13 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
5 |
|
13 |
WM3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
12 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Dec-15 |
13 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
WM2A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
12 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
9 |
|
13 |
WM3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
13 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Jan-16 |
13 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
WM2A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
20 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
8 |
|
13 |
WM3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
13 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
38 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
39 |
WM2A |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
7 |
|
45 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
1 |
22 |
|
39 |
WM3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
38 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
Sum |
0 |
0 |
2 |
40 |
2 |
35 |
6.2.3
In the Reporting Period, a total of seventy-nine
(79) Action/ Limit Level exceedances namely 42 exceedances of turbidity and 37
exceedances of SS were recorded. NOEs were issued
to relevant parties upon confirmation of the results.
6.2.4
Investigation
reports for the exceedance were conducted by the ET and the investigation
results are summarized in Table 6-6.
The detailed investigation
reports have been presented in the relevant monthly EM&A reports.
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Exceedance Day |
Location |
Exceeded Parameter |
Cause of Water Quality Exceedance |
2, 6 and 10 Nov
2015 |
WM2A |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were due to turbid water generated
by the falling water impacted the river bed soil at the outfall. The Contractor has modified the
outfall location on 11 Nov 2015. |
4, 6 and 10 Nov
2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were due to shallow water and disturbance of sediment at the channel bed and not related to the project. |
16 Nov 15 |
WM2A |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were a single event due to rain and not
related to the project. |
12 Nov 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU |
Exceedances
were due to shallow water and disturbance of sediment at the channel bed and not related to the project. |
14 Nov 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
|
26 and 28 Nov 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
|
1 Dec 2015 |
WM1 |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances were a
single event and not related to the
works under the project. |
3 Dec 2015 |
WM4 |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances were due
to the accident of burst water main of Contract 3 and not related to the works under the project. |
10, 12 and 14 Dec
2015 |
WM1 |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances were due
to residual impact after rainstorm and not
related to the works under the project. |
7 and 11 Dec 2015 |
WM2A |
NTU & SS |
No wastewater
generated and discharge and runoff from the site and it is considered that
the exceedances were not likely due
to the project. |
9 Dec 2015 |
WM3 |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances were due
to rainstorm and not related to the
works under the project. |
2, 4 and 7 Dec 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were due to shallow water and disturbance of sediment at the channel bed and not related to the project. |
9 Dec 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were due to muddy runoff during
heavy rain. The Contractor was
advised to improve the capacity of the pit and construct temporary drainage
channel to collect the site runoff. |
15 Dec 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
|
17, 19, 21 and 23
Dec 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were due to shallow water and disturbance of sediment at the channel bed and not related to the project. |
31 Dec 2015 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Exceedances
were due to muddy runoff during
heavy rain. The Contractor was
advised to improve the capacity of the pit and construct temporary drainage
channel to collect the site runoff. |
2-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
The exceedances were
related to Contract 6 when the Contractor conducted channel cleaning for
sediment and muddy water removal after rainfall. Mitigation measures such as sump pit
with temporary channel were constructed under the slope to divert the muddy
runoff. Enhance work such as
hydro-seeding was applied at the stabilized slope in late January 2016. |
6-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
The implemented mitigation measures and capacity of
sump pits by Contract 6 were not
sufficient to cater the muddy runoff from site uphill. Mitigation measures such as sump pit
with temporary channel were constructed under the slope to divert the muddy
runoff. Enhance work such as
hydro-seeding was applied at the stabilized slope in late January 2016. |
7-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU |
The exceedances were due to the shallow water and
the disturbance of sediment at river bed and it unlikely related to the works under Contract 6. |
8-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
The exceedances were due to the shallow water and
the disturbance of sediment at river bed and it unlikely related to the works under the Contract 6. |
11-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU |
The exceedances were due to the shallow water and
the disturbance of sediment at river bed and it unlikely related to the works under Contract 6. |
12-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
The implemented mitigation measures and capacity of
sump pits by Contract 6 were not
sufficient to cater the muddy runoff from site uphill. Mitigation measures such as sump pit
with temporary channel were constructed under the slope to divert the muddy
runoff. Enhance work such as
hydro-seeding was applied at the stabilized slope in late January 2016. |
15-Jan-16 |
WM4 |
NTU |
The exceedance was a single incident due to
rainstorm and unlikely related to
the works under the Contracts 2 and 3. |
16-Jan-16 |
WM2A |
NTU & SS |
Current
mitigation measures provided by Contract 6 such covering the opened slope are
not sufficient to cope with site runoff especially when raining. Construction of bund along the
riverside has been undertaking since 3 February 2016 at the works
area of Bridge D. |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
The exceedances were likely related to contribution
of muddy runoff from the public road surface and unlikely related to the works under Contract 6. |
|
18-Jan-16 |
WM2A |
NTU & SS |
Current
mitigation measures provided by Contract 6 such covering the opened slope are
not sufficient to cope with site runoff especially when raining.
Construction of bund along the riverside has been undertaking since 3 February 2016 at
the works area of Bridge D. |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
The exceedances were likely related to contribution
of muddy runoff from the public road surface and unlikely related to the works under Contract 6. |
|
28-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Current mitigation measures provided by
Contract 6 were not adequate to cater the large amount of storm runoff during
rainstorm. The Contractor has newly
constructed a sump pit to
collect the muddy runoff on 4 February 2016. |
29-Jan-16 |
WM2B |
NTU & SS |
Current mitigation measures provided by
Contract 6 were not adequate to cater the large amount of storm runoff during
rainstorm. The Contractor has newly
constructed a sump pit to
collect the muddy runoff on 4 February 2016. |
6.2.5
The summary of weather conditions during the Reporting Period is presented in Appendix H.
7.1.1
Waste management was carried out by an
on-site Environmental Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time.
7.2.1
All types of waste arising from the
construction work are classified into the following:
l
Construction & Demolition (C&D)
Material;
l
Chemical Waste;
l
General Refuse
7.2.2
Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable. The
quantities of waste for disposal in the Reporting Period are summarized in Tables
7-1 and 7-2 and the Waste Flow Table is presented in Appendix I.
Table 7-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Type of Waste |
Contract No |
Quantity |
Disposal
Location |
|||
Nov 15 |
Dec 15 |
Jan 16 |
Total |
|||
C&D Materials (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
46.3947 |
50.4888 |
74.4242 |
308.9767 |
- |
3 |
2.99 |
3.158 |
2.43 |
- |
||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
||
6 |
16.813 |
51.601 |
58.943 |
- |
||
SS C505 |
0.271 |
0.663 |
0.8 |
- |
||
Reused in this Project (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
2.5152 |
0.8455 |
0.6482 |
23.7239 |
- |
3 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
0.03 |
- |
||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
||
6 |
0.717 |
11.077 |
3.811 |
- |
||
SS C505 |
1.28 |
0 |
0 |
- |
||
Reused in other Projects (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
42.153 |
49.2509 |
32.5036 |
145.3215 |
C6 / NENT# & other project approved by the ER |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
||
6 |
2.456 |
6.827 |
12.131 |
C5 and other project approved by the ET |
||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
Disposal as Public
Fill (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
1.7265 |
0.395 |
41.2724 |
141.1234 |
Tuen Mun 38 |
3 |
1.79 |
1.558 |
2.4 |
|||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
13.68 |
33.697 |
43.001 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.143 |
0.663 |
0.8 |
Remark #: The C&D materials were delivered to NENT
for reuse by laying cover of the landfilling area.
Table 7-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Type of Waste |
Contract No |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
|||
Nov 15 |
Dec 15 |
Jan 16 |
Total |
|||
Recycled Metal (¡¥000kg) |
2 |
0 |
5.61 |
0 |
10.34+0.002# |
By licensed
collector |
#3 |
0.001 |
0 |
0.001 |
|||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
4.73 |
|||
Recycled Paper / Cardboard Packing (¡¥000kg) |
2 |
0 |
0.4 |
0 |
0.649 |
By licensed
collector |
#3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0.102 |
0.147 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Recycled
Plastic (¡¥000kg) |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.001# |
By licensed collector |
#3 |
0 |
0.001 |
0 |
|||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Chemical
Wastes (¡¥000kg) |
2 |
3.696 |
0.88 |
0.88 |
26.256 0.0006# |
By licensed collector |
#3 |
0 |
0.0006 |
0 |
|||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
18.2 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
2.6 |
0 |
0 |
|||
General
Refuses (¡¥000m3) |
2 |
0.0953 |
0.0446 |
0.1247 |
2.4186 |
NENT |
3 |
0.13 |
0.145 |
0.115 |
|||
5 |
0.03 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
|||
6 |
0.594 |
0.08 |
0.695 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.052 |
0.111 |
0.072 |
Remark #: Unit of
recycled metal, recycled paper/ cardboard packing, recycled plastic and
chemical waste for Contractor 3 was in (¡¥000m3).
7.2.3
To control the site performance on waste management, the
Contractor shall ensure that all solid and liquid waste management works are
fully in compliance with the relevant license/permit requirements, such as the
effluent discharge license and the chemical waste producer registration. The Contractor is also reminded to
implement the recommended environmental mitigation measures according to the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Manual.
8.1.1
According to the approved EM&A Manual, the
environmental site inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Weekly environmental site inspections should
carry out to confirm the environmental performance.
Contract 2
8.1.2
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 2 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
8-1 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 8-1 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 2
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2015 |
6, 13, 20 and 26 November 2015 |
6 |
Completed |
December 2015 |
4, 11, 18, 23 and 30 December 2015 |
5 |
Completed |
January 2016 |
8, 15, 22 and 29 January 2016 |
7 |
Completed |
8.1.3
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 8
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract 3
8.1.4
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 3 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
8-2 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 8-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 3
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2015 |
2, 9, 18, 23 and 30 November 2015 |
7 |
Completed |
December 2015 |
7, 16, 21 and 28 December 2015 |
9 |
Completed |
January 2016 |
4, 11, 20 and 25 January 2016 |
4 |
Completed |
8.1.5
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 22
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract 5
8.1.6
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 5 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
8-3 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 8-3 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 5
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
|
November 2015 |
5, 12, 19 and 26 November 2015 |
2 |
Completed |
December 2015 |
3, 10, 16, 24 and 31 December 2015 |
7 |
Completed |
January 2016 |
7, 12, 19 and 26 January 2016 |
3 |
Completed |
8.1.7
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 11
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract 6
8.1.8
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 6 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
8-4 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 8-4 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 5
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2015 |
6, 13, 20 and 27 November 2015 |
13 |
Completed |
December 2015 |
3, 10, 17, 23 and 30 December 2015 |
18 |
Completed |
January 2016 |
7, 14, 21 and 28 January 2016. |
12 |
Completed |
8.1.9
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 10
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract SS
C505
8.1.10
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract SS C505 to
evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 8-5 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 8-5 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract SS C505
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2015 |
4, 11, 18 and 25 November 2015 |
7 |
Completed |
December 2015 |
2, 9, 16, 23 and 30 December 2015 |
6 |
Completed |
January 2016 |
6, 13, 20 and 27 January 2016 |
7 |
Completed |
8.1.11
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 16
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract 7
8.1.12
Although construction activities under Contract
7 have not yet commenced, site preparation work was conducted. In the Reporting Period, 2
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 7 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
8-6 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 8-6 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 7
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
January 2016 |
5 and 26 January 2016 |
1 |
Completed |
8.1.13
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 1
observation/ reminder was recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Other
Contracts
8.1.14
Since the construction works at the Contract
4 are not yet commenced, no site inspection is performed for these Contracts.
9.1.1
In
the Reporting Period, no summons and prosecution under the EM&A Programme
was lodged for the Project.
However, one (1) verbal and five (5) documented environmental complaints were received
and lodged for Contracts 6. Follow
up actions have been undertaking by the Contractor to resolve the deficiencies.
The details of complaint are listed below:-
6 and 10 November 2015 - the complainant complained that the construction
work caused water pollution to Ping Yuen River, which seriously polluted the
water environment and the farm and cropping
owned by the complainant. The complainant hopes the related department
immediately rectified the deficiency immediately.
1 December 2015 - EPD received a
complaint from a villager in Ping Yeung Village which adjacent to the
construction site of Bridge C under Contract 6 regarding the dust emission.
16 December 2015 - A public complaint
was received by EPD regarding muddy water discharge at Bridge C to a fish pond
nearby.
4 January 2016 - A land user of the
farm located at junction of Ng Chow Road and Wo Keng
Shan Road notified the Contractor of C6 (CCKJV) that muddy water was observed
in the his land area. It was
suspected that the muddy water was discharged from the construction site of C6.
14 January 2016 - A complaint was
received by EPD regarding the soil/ muddy water brought by the vehicle when
leaving the construction site. The
soil/ muddy water were cumulated at the road and this situation has been
observed for a long period of time.
It was suspected that the wheel washing facilities of the construction
site was not in proper function and follow up action is required.
20 January 2016 - A complaint was
received from EPD regarding soil/ muddy water gushed out from the construction
site and getting into his village house area. In view of the complaint location and
confirmed with the Contractor, this complaint is related to the accident of
burst pump pipe from a recirculation tank during the bored piling work at
Bridge B happened on 4 January 2016, which causing muddy water leaked from the
works area to the nearby village house area.
9.1.2
Upon receipt of
the complaint, follow up action has been undertaken by both Contractor promptly
to resolve the complaints and deficiencies. During the complaint investigation work,
the Contractor was co-operated with the ET in providing all the necessary
information and assistance for completion of the investigation. The investigation reports conducted by
the ET were submitted to relevant parties.
9.2.1
In
the Reporting Period, no environmental complaints, summons and prosecution
under the EM&A Programme was lodged.
9.2.2
The
statistical summary table of environmental complaint, summons and prosecution
are presented in Tables 9-1, 9-2 and
9-3.
Table 9-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||
2 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
13 |
(6) Water Quality (5) Construction Dust (2) Noise |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
|||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
|||
3 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
3 |
(1) Construction Dust (2) Water quality |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
|||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
|||
5 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
2 |
(2) Construction Dust |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
|||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
|||
6 |
Nov
2015 |
1 |
6 |
(5) Water Quality (1) construction Dust |
Dec
2015 |
2 |
|||
Jan
2016 |
3 |
|||
SS C505 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
|||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
Table 9-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Summons Statistics |
||||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||||
Water |
Air |
Noise |
||||
2 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
5 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
6 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS C505 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan
2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 9-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Prosecution Statistics |
||||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||||
Water |
Air |
Noise |
||||
2 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
5 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
6 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS C505 |
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Nov
2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9.2.3
Since the construction works at the Contract
4 and Contract 7 are not yet commenced, no environmental complaint, summons and
prosecution are received in the Reporting Period accordingly.
Warning Letter
9.2.4
A warning letter from EPD was issued to Contract
6 on 1 February 2016 regarding Non Compliance (NC) with APCO for the
non-covered dump trucks travelling to Fill Bank at TM Area 38 on 14 and 18
January 2016 respectively. The
Contractor has explained to the EPD that all dump trucks under the Contract
were well covered before leaving the site, however, some drivers of the dump
trucks immediately opened the cover when they just get into Fill Bank at TM
Area 38 and captured by the CCTV. A
briefing and warning letter has given to the relevant drivers to prevent
reoccurrence of similar case.
10.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that
recommended in the Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation
Measures (ISEMM) in the approved EM&A Manual covered the issues of dust,
noise, water and waste and they are summarized presented in Appendix
J.
10.1.2
All contracts under the Project shall be
implementing the required environmental mitigation measures according to the approved
EM&A Manual as subject to the site condition. Environmental mitigation measures
generally implemented by Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and SS C505 in this Reporting
Period are summarized in Table 10-1.
Table 10-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Water Quality |
¡P Wastewater to be treated by
the filtration systems i.e. sedimentation tank or AquaSed before to discharge. |
Air Quality |
¡P Maintain damp / wet surface
on access road ¡P Keep slow speed in the sites ¡P All vehicles must use wheel
washing facility before off site ¡P Sprayed water during
breaking works ¡P A
cleaning truck was regularly performed on the public road to prevent fugitive dust emission |
Noise |
¡P Restrain operation time of
plants from 07:00 to 19:00 on any working day except for Public Holiday and
Sunday. ¡P Keep good maintenance of
plants ¡P Place noisy plants away from
residence or school ¡P Provide noise barriers or
hoarding to enclose the noisy plants or works ¡P Shut down the plants when
not in used. |
Waste and Chemical
Management |
¡P On-site sorting prior to
disposal ¡P Follow requirements and
procedures of the ¡§Trip-ticket System¡¨ ¡P Predict required quantity of
concrete accurately ¡P Collect
the unused fresh concrete at designated locations in the sites for subsequent
disposal |
General |
¡P The site was generally kept
tidy and clean. |
11.1.1
This is the 10th Quarterly EM&A Summary
Report presenting the monitoring results and inspection findings for the
Reporting Period from 1 November 2015 to 31 January 2016.
11.1.2
For air quality monitoring, no 1-hour and
24-hour TSP monitoring results triggered the Action or Limit Levels were
recorded. No NOEs or the associated corrective actions
were therefore issued.
11.1.3 No noise
complaint (which is an Action Level exceedance) was received. However, one Limit Level exceedance of
construction noise was recorded in the Reporting Period. The investigation report for cause of
exceedance was conducted by ET and submitted to relevant parties.
11.1.4 For water
quality monitoring, a total of seventy-nine (79) Action/ Limit Level exceedances
namely 42 exceedances of turbidity and 37 exceedances of SS were recorded. NOEs
were issued to relevant parties upon confirmation of the results. The
investigation reports for cause of exceedances were conducted by ET and
submitted to relevant parties.
11.1.5
During the Reporting Period, weekly joint
site inspections for Contract 2, Contract 3, Contract 5, Contract 6, Contract 7
and Contract SS C505 were undertaken to evaluate the site environmental
performance. No non-compliances were observed during the weekly
site inspection and environmental audit of the Reporting Period, indicating the
implemented mitigation measures for air quality, construction noise and water
quality were effective. Minor
deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general rectified
within the specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
11.1.6 In this
Reporting Period, one (1) verbal and five
(5) documented environmental complaints were received and lodged for Contracts
6. Follow up actions have been
undertaking by the Contractor to resolve the deficiencies. The investigation reports conducted by
the ET were submitted to relevant parties.
11.1.7 No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period. However, a warning letter
from EPD was issued to Contract 6 on 1 February 2016 regarding Non Compliance
(NC) with APCO for the non-covered dump trucks travelling to Fill Bank at TM
Area 38 on 14 and 18 January 2016 respectively. As advised by the Contractor, a briefing
and warning letter has given to the relevant drivers to prevent reoccurrence of
similar case.
11.2.1
During dry season, special attention should
be paid on the potential construction dust impact since most of the
construction sites are adjacent to villages. The Contractor should fully
implement the construction dust mitigation measures properly.
11.2.2
The Contractor was also reminded to prevent
muddy water or other water pollutants from site surface flow to local stream
such as Kong Yiu Channel and Ma Wat Channel or public area. Water quality mitigation measures to
prevent surface runoff into nearby water bodies or public areas should paid
attention and fully implemented.
11.2.3
Construction noise would be a key
environmental issue during construction work of the Project. Noise mitigation measures such as using
quiet plants should be implemented in accordance with the EM&A requirement.