|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Job No.: TCS00694/13 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Agreement No. CE 45/2008
(CE) Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
and Associated Works |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
13th Quarterly Environmental
Monitoring & Audit Summary Report ¡V (August to October 2016) |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared
For |
|
|
||
|
|
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) |
|
|
||
Quality Index |
|||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
3 March 2017 |
TCS00694/13/600/R0831v2 |
|
|
Nicola
Hon (Environmental Consultant) |
T.W. Tam (Environmental Team Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Description |
1 |
16 February 2017 |
First
Submission |
2 |
3 March 2017 |
Amended according to the IEC¡¦s comments on 28
February 2017 |
|
|
|
This
report has been prepared by Action-United Environmental Services &
Consulting with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of
the Agreement with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions
of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement
with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in
respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is
confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever
nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made
known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. |
Executive Summary
ES.01. This is the 13th Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
for the ¡§Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
and Associated Works¡¨ under Environmental Permit No. EP-404/2011/D (hereinafter ¡¥¡¥the EP¡¦¡¦), covering the period from 1 August 2016 to 31 October 2016 (hereinafter ¡§Reporting Period¡¨).
Environmental Monitoring and
Audit Activities
ES.02. In the
Reporting Period, the construction works under Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai
Boundary Control Point and Associated Works of the Project
included Contract 2, Contract 3, Contract 5, Contract 6, Contract 7 and
Contract SS C505, in which the major
construction activities under Contract 5 have been substantially completed on 31 August 2016. Environmental
monitoring activities under the EM&A programme in
the Reporting Period are summarized in the following table.
Environmental Aspect |
Monitoring
Parameters / Inspection |
Reporting Period |
|
Monitoring Locations
/ Contracts |
Total Occasions |
||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
9 |
432 |
24-hour TSP |
9 |
144 |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
10 |
130 |
Water Quality |
Water in-situ measurement and/or sampling |
WM1 & WM1-C, |
40 scheduled and 1 extra of sampling day |
WM2A & WM2A-Cx |
40 scheduled and 14 extra of sampling day |
||
WM2B & WM2B-C |
40 scheduled and 6 extra of sampling day |
||
WM3 &WM3-C |
40 scheduled and 4 extra of sampling day |
||
WM4, WM4-CA &WM4-CB |
40 scheduled and 3 extra of sampling day |
||
Ecology |
Woodland compensation i) General Health condition of planted species ii) Survival of planted species |
9 Quadrats |
1 |
Joint Site Inspection / Audit |
IEC, ET, the Contractor and RE joint site Environmental Inspection and Auditing |
Contract 2 |
12 (#) |
Contract 3 |
14 |
||
Contract 5 |
5 |
||
Contract 6 |
13 |
||
Contract 7 |
13 |
||
Contract SS C505 |
13 |
Note: Extra monitoring day was due to
measurement results exceedance
(#) Site inspection scheduled on 21 October 2016 was cancelled due to
typhoon signal no. 8
Breaches
of Action/Limit levels
ES.03. In the
Reporting Period, no construction noise
exceedance was registered for the Project.
For air quality, two (2) Action
Level exceedances were recorded. Moreover, a total of 100 of Action/ Limit Level exceedance were recorded for water
quality monitoring which included turbidity and Suspended Solids. The summary of exceedance for the
Reporting Period is shown below.
Environmental
Aspect |
Monitoring Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Event & Action |
||
NOE Issued |
Investigation |
Corrective Actions |
||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
24-hour TSP |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-- |
-- |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
Turbidity |
2 |
41 |
43 |
2 exceedances were Project related 41 exceedances were not Project
related |
The Contractors of C6 shall implemented water
quality mitigation measures in accordance with ISEMM of the EM&A Manual
requirements |
|
SS |
1 |
56 |
57 |
2 exceedances were Project related 55 exceedances were not Project
related |
Environmental
Complaint
ES.04. In this
Reporting Period, five (5) documented
environmental complaints were received for the Project. Upon
receipt of the complaint, follow up action has been undertaken
by both Contractor promptly to resolve the complaints and deficiencies. Investigation for the complaint was
carried out by ET independently and the associated investigation reports were
submitted to relevant parties. In
the Reporting Period, two (2) out of five (5) complaints were considered as
project related and remedial action had undertaken by the Contractor.
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
ES.05. No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period.
Reporting Changes
ES.06. In the
Reporting period, the major construction activities under Contractor 5 have
been substantially completed on 31 August 2016. Due to termination of construction phase
of Contract 5, the site inspection for Contract 5 would be ceased from 31
August 2016.
ES.07. Ecology
monitoring for woodland compensation was conducted on 30 September 2016. The Monitoring Report for Woodland Compensation will be
prepared and submitted as a stand-alone report as supplementary for the
EM&A Report.
Future key issues
ES.08. During dry
season, special attention should be paid on the potential construction dust
impact since most of the construction sites are adjacent to villages. The
Contractor should fully implement the construction dust mitigation measures.
ES.09. Preventive
measures for muddy water or other water pollutants from site surface flow to local
stream such as Kong Yiu Channel, Ma Wat Channel, Ping
Yuen River or public area should be properly maintained. The Contractors should paid special
attention on water quality mitigation measures and fully implement according
ISEMM of the EM&A Manual, in particular for working areas near Ma Wat
Channel and Ping Yuen River.
Moreover, all effluent discharge shall be ensure to fulfill Technical
Memorandum of Effluent Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, inland
and Coastal Waters criteria or discharge permits stipulation.
ES.10. Construction
noise would be a key environmental issue during construction work of the
Project. Noise mitigation measures
such as using quiet plants should be implemented in accordance with the
EM&A requirement.
Table of Contents
2 Project Organization and
Construction progress
2.1 Construction
Contract Packaging
2.5 Summary of Environmental Submissions
3 Project Organization and
Construction progress
3.4 Monitoring
Frequency and Period
3.8 Derivation
of Action/Limit (A/L) Levels
3.9 Data
Management and Data QA/QC Control
4.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
5 Construction Noise
Monitoring
5.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
5.3 Noise
Monitoring Results (Restricted Hours)
6.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
8.2 Records
of Waste Quantities
10 Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Prosecutions
10.1 Status
of Non-compliance Environmental Complaint, Summons and Prosecution
11 Implementation Status of Mitigation
Measures
12 Conclusions and Recommendations
List
of tables
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Table 3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Table 3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-8 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Table 3-10 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Table 4-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Air Quality A/L Levels
Table 5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Table 5-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Construction Noise A/L Levels
Table 5-3 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results for Restricted Hours
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 5
Table 6-2 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 3
Table 6-3 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 6
Table 6-4 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 6
Table 6-5 Summaries
of Breaches of the Existing Water Quality A/L Levels
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Table 8-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 8-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 9-1 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 2
Table 9-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 3
Table 9-3 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 5
Table 9-4 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 6
Table 9-5 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract SS C505
Table 9-6 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 7
Table 10-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 10-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 10-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Table 11-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List of Annexes
Appendix A Layout plan of the Project
Appendix B Environmental Management Organization Chart
Appendix C Designated
Monitoring Locations as Recommended in the Approved EM&A Manual
Appendix D Monitoring Locations for Impact Monitoring
Appendix E Event and Action Plan
Appendix F Graphical Plots for Monitoring
Result
Appendix G Weather information
Appendix H Waste Flow Table
Appendix I Implementation Schedule for
Environmental Mitigation Measures
1.1.1. Civil Engineering and
Development Department is the Project
Proponent and the Permit Holder of Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang /
Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works, which is
a Designated Project to be implemented under Environmental Permit number EP-404/2011/C granted on 12 March
2015 and the latest Environmental Permit
number EP-404/2011/D granted on 20 January 2017.
1.1.2. The Project consists of two main
components: Construction of a Boundary Control Point (hereinafter referred as
¡§BCP¡¨); and Construction of a connecting road alignment. Layout plan of the Project is shown in Appendix A.
1.1.3. The proposed BCP is located at the
boundary with Shenzhen near the existing Chuk Yuen
Village, comprising a main passenger building with passenger and cargo
processing facilities and the associated customs, transport and ancillary
facilities. The connecting road
alignment consists of six main sections:
1)
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area (FCA) Boundary ¡V this section
comprises at-grade and viaducts and includes the improvement works at Lin Ma
Hang Road;
2)
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan ¡V this section
stretches from the Frontier Closed Area Boundary to the tunnel portal at Cheung
Shan and comprises at-grade and viaducts including an interchange at Ping
Yeung;
3)
North Tunnel ¡V this section comprises the tunnel segment at Cheung Shan
and includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel;
4)
Sha Tau Kok Road ¡V this section stretches from
the tunnel portal at Wo Keng Shan to the tunnel
portal south of Loi Tung and comprises at-grade and
viaducts including an interchange at Sha Tau Kok and
an administration building;
5)
South Tunnel ¡V this section comprises a tunnel segment that stretches from
Loi Tung to Fanling and
includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel as
well as a ventilation building in the middle of the tunnel near Lau Shui Heung;
6)
Fanling ¡V this section comprises the at-grade, viaducts
and interchange connection to the existing Fanling
Highway.
1.1.4.
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting has been commissioned as an Independent ET to implement the
relevant EM&A program in accordance
with the approved EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties.
1.1.5.
This is the 13th Quarterly EM&A Summary
Report presenting the monitoring results and inspection findings for the
Reporting Period from 1 August 2016 to 31 October 2016.
1.2.1
The Quarterly Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) Summary Report is structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Project Organization and
Construction progress
Section 3 Summary of Impact monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air Quality Monitoring
Section 5 Construction Noise
Monitoring
Section 6 Water Quality Monitoring
Section 7 Ecology Monitoring
Section 8 Waste Management
Section 9 Site Inspection
Section 10 Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Prosecutions
Section 11 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 12 Conclusions and Recommendations
2.1.1
To facilitate the project management and
implementation, the Project would be divided by the following contracts:
¡P
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
¡P
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
¡P
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
¡P
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
¡P
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
¡P
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
¡P
ArchSD Contract No. SS C505
2.1.2
The
details of each contracts is summarized below and the delineation of each contracts is shown in Appendix A.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.1.3
Contract 2 has awarded in December 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 19 May 2014. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 2 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
an approximately 5.2km long dual two-lane connecting road (with about 0.4km of
at-grade road and 4.8km of tunnel) connecting the Fanling
Interchange with the proposed Sha Tau Kok
Interchange;
¡P
construction of a
ventilation adit tunnel and the mid-ventilation
building;
¡P
construction of
the north and south portal buildings of the Lung Shan Tunnel and their
associated slope works;
¡P
provision and
installation of ventilation system, E&M works and building services works
for Lung Shan tunnel and Cheung Shan tunnel and their portal buildings;
¡P
construction of
Tunnel Administration Building adjacent to Wo Keng
Shan Road and the associated E&M and building services works; and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.1.4
Contract 3 was awarded in July 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 5 November 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 3 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of four
link roads connecting the existing Fanling Highway
and the south portal of the Lung Shan Tunnel;
¡P
realignment of
the existing Tai Wo Service Road West and Tai Wo Service Road East;
¡P
widening of the
existing Fanling Highway (HyD¡¦s
entrustment works);
¡P
demolishing
existing Kiu Tau vehicular bridge and Kiu Tau footbridge and reconstruction of the existing Kiu Tau Footbridge (HyD¡¦s
entrustment works); and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks, landscaping
works and other ancillary works.
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.1.5
Contract
4 has awarded in mid-April 2016. However, the major construction work still is not
yet commenced. The scope of work
of the Contract 4 includes:
¡P
design,
supply, delivery, installation, testing and commissioning of a traffic control
and surveillance system for the connecting road linking up the Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and the
existing Fanling Highway.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.1.6
Contract 5 has awarded in April 2013 and
construction work was commenced in August 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 5 is
listed below:
¡P
site formation of about 23
hectares of land for the development of the BCP;
¡P
construction of an
approximately 1.6 km long perimeter road at the BCP including a 175m long
depressed road;
¡P
associated
diversion/modification works at existing local roads and junctions including
Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
construction of pedestrian
subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
provision of resite area with supporting infrastructure for reprovisioning of the affected village houses; and
¡P
construction of associated footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage,
sewerage, waterworks, landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.1.7
Contract 6 was awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 6 would
be included below:
construction of an approximately 4.6km long dual two-lane connecting
road (with about 0.6km of at-grade road, 3.3km of viaduct and 0.7km of tunnel)
connecting the BCP with the proposed Sha Tau Kok Road
Interchange and the associated ventilation buildings;
associated diversion/modification works at access roads to the resite of Chuk Yuen Village;
provision of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities for
the BCP and the resite of Chuk
Yuen Village;
construction of a pedestrian subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang
Road;
provisioning of the affected facilities including Wo Keng Shan Road garden; and
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.1.8
Contract 7 was awarded in December 2015 and
the construction work was commenced 15 February 2016. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 7 would
be included below:
construction of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) portion of four vehicular bridge
construction of one
pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen (SZ) River (cross boundary bridges)
ArchSD Contract No. SS
C505
2.1.9
SS C505 has been awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. Major Scope of Work of the SS C505 would
be included below:
passenger-related facilities including processing
kiosks and examination facilities for private cars and coaches, passenger
clearance building and halls, the interior fitting works for the pedestrian
bridge crossing Shenzhen River, etc.;
cargo processing facilities including kiosks
for clearance of goods vehicles, customs inspection platforms, X-ray building,
etc.;
accommodation for the facilities inside of the
Government departments providing services in connection with the BCP;
transport-related facilities inside the BCP
including road networks, public transport interchange, transport drop-off and
pick-up areas, vehicle holding areas and associated road furniture etc;
a public carpark; and
other ancillary
facilities such as sewerage and drainage, building services provisions and
electronic systems, associated environmental mitigation measure and landscape
works.
2.2.1
The project organization is shown in Appendix B. The responsibilities of respective parties are:
Civil
Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)
2.2.2
CEDD is the Project Proponent and the Permit Holder of the EP of the development
of the Project and will assume overall responsibility for the project. An
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) shall be employed by CEDD to audit the
results of the EM&A works carried out by the ET.
Architectural
Services Department (ArchSD)
2.2.3
ArchSD acts as
the works agent for Development Bureau (DEVB), for Contract SS C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point (BCP) ¡V BCP
Buildings and Associated Facilities.
Environmental
Protection Department (EPD)
2.2.4
EPD is the statutory enforcement body for
environmental protection matters in Hong Kong.
Ronald Lu
& Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd (The Architect)
2.2.5
Ronald Lu & Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd is
appointed by ArchSD as an Architect for Contract SS
C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
(BCP) ¡V BCP Buildings and Associated Facilities. It responsible for overseeing the
construction works of Contract SS C505 and for ensuring that the works are
undertaken by the Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract
requirements. The duties and responsibilities of the Architect with respect to
EM&A are:
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the
environmental mitigation measures and their effectiveness
Monitor Contractors¡¦ and ET¡¦s compliance with
the requirements in the Environmental Permit (EP) and EM&A Manual
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the EM&A
programme
Participate in joint site inspection by the ET
and IEC
Oversee the implementation of the agreed Event
/ Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project discussing regarding the
cumulative impact issues.
Engineer
or Engineers Representative (ER)
2.2.6
The ER is responsible for overseeing the
construction works and for ensuring that the works are undertaken by the
Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract requirements. The
duties and responsibilities of the ER with respect to EM&A are:
¡P
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the
environmental mitigation measures and their effectiveness
¡P
Monitor Contractors¡¦s,
ET¡¦s and IEC¡¦s compliance with the requirements in the Environmental Permit
(EP) and EM&A Manual
¡P
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the
EM&A programme
¡P
Participate in joint site inspection by the
ET and IEC
¡P
Oversee the implementation of the agreed
Event / Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s Regulaiton of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project
discussing regarding the cumulative impact issues.
The
Contractor(s)
2.2.7
There will be one contractor for each
individual works contract. The
Contractor(s) should report to the ER. The duties and responsibilities of the
Contractor are:
¡P
Comply with the relevant contract conditions
and specifications on environmental protection
¡P
Employ an Environmental Team (ET) to
undertake monitoring, laboratory analysis and reporting of EM &A Facilitate
ET¡¦s monitoring and site inspection activities
¡P
Participate in the site inspections by the ET
and IEC, and undertake any corrective actions
¡P
Provide information / advice to the ET
regarding works programme and activities which may
contribute to the generation of adverse environmental impacts
¡P
Submit proposals on mitigation measures in
case of exceedances of Action and Limit levels in accordance with the Event /
Action Plans
¡P
Implement measures to reduce impact where
Action and Limit levels are exceeded
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Environmental Team (ET)
2.2.8
One ET will be employed for this Project. The ET shall not be in any way an
associated body of the Contractor(s), and shall be employed by the Project
Proponent/Contractor to conduct the EM&A programme.
The ET should be managed by the ET
Leader. The ET Leader shall be a person who has at least 7 years¡¦ experience in
EM&A and has relevant professional qualifications. Suitably qualified staff
should be included in the ET, and resources for the implementation of the
EM&A programme should be allocated in time under
the Contract(s), to enable fulfillment of the Project¡¦s EM&A requirements
as specified in the EM&A Manual during construction of the Project. The ET shall report to the Project
Proponent and the duties shall include:
¡P
Monitor and audit various environmental
parameters as required in this EM&A Manual
¡P
Analyse the environmental
monitoring and audit data, review the success of EM&A programme
and the adequacy of mitigation measures implemented, confirm the validity of
the EIA predictions and identify any adverse environmental impacts arising
¡P
Carry out regular site inspection to
investigate and audit the Contractors¡¦ site practice, equipment/plant and work
methodologies with respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation,
and effect proactive action to pre-empt problems
¡P
Monitor compliance with conditions in the EP,
environmental protection, pollution prevention and control regulations and
contract specifications
¡P
Audit environmental conditions on site
¡P
Report on the environmental monitoring and
audit results to EPD, the ER, the lEC and Contractor(s) or their delegated representatives
¡P
Recommend suitable mitigation measures to the
Contractor in the case of exceedance of Action and Limit levels in accordance
with the Event and Action Plans
¡P
Liaise with the IEC on all environmental
performance matters and timely submit all relevant EM&A proforma
for approval by IEC
¡P
Advise the Contractor(s) on environmental
improvement, awareness, enhancement measures etc., on site
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, ET, lEC and the
Contractor(s) of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
2.2.9
One IEC will be employed for this Project. The Independent Environmental Checker
(IEC) should not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor(s) or the
ET for the Project. The IEC should
be employed by the Permit Holder (i.e., CEDD) prior to
the commencement of the construction of the Project. The IEC should have at least 10 years¡¦
experience in EM&A and have relevant professional qualifications. The duty of IEC should be:
¡P
Provide proactive advice to the ER and the
Project Proponent on EM&A matters related to the project, independent from
the management of construction works, but empowered to audit the environmental
performance of construction
¡P
Review and audit all aspects of the EM&A programme implemented by the ET
¡P
Review and verify the monitoring data and all
submissions in connection with the EP and EM&A Manual submitted by the ET
¡P
Arrange and conduct regular, at least monthly
site inspections of the works during construction phase, and ad hoc inspections
if significant environmental problems are identified
¡P
Check compliance with the agreed Event /
Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Check compliance with the procedures for
carrying out complaint investigation
¡P
Check the effectiveness of corrective
measures
¡P
Feedback audit results to ET by signing off
relevant EM&A proforma
¡P
Check that the mitigation measures are
effectively implemented
¡P
Report the works conducted, the findings,
recommendation and improvement of the site inspections, after reviewing ET¡¦s
and Contractor¡¦s works, and advices to the ER and Project Proponent on a
monthly basis
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, ET, lEC and the
Contractor(s) of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
2.3.1
The concurrent construction works that may be
carried out include, but not limited to, the following:
(a)
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage IV;
(b)
Widening of Fanling
Highway ¡V Tai Hang to Wo Hop Shek
Interchange ¡V Contract No. HY/2012/06;
(c)
Construction of BCP facilities in Shenzhen.
2.4.1
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction activity conducted under the Project is located in Contracts 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and SS C505 and they are summarized in below.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.4.2
Construction work of Contract 2 was commenced
on 19 May 2014, the following activities were
conducted in the Reporting Period.
Mid-Vent Portal |
Stud tunnel and cavern
excavation Tube excavation (NB +
SB) Adit invert slab, waterproofing
and lining, post-excavation grouting Ventilation building
superstructure and backfilling |
North Portal |
Slope stabilization and
retaining wall Southbound Tunnel Boring
Machine (TBM) excavation Northbound bench
excavation and tunnel enlargement Tunnel internal
structure and cross passage ventilation building
foundation |
South Portal |
Southbound and Northbound Drill and Blast (D&B)
excavation
South ventilation building superstructure
Blast curtain inside the tunnel
Tunnel invert, waterproofing and lining |
Admin Building |
Building superstructure and external wall |
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.4.3
Contract commenced in November 2013, the
following activities were conducted in the Reporting Period.
Cable
detection and trial trenches
Installation
of Stone Cladding
Noise
barrier construction
Pier /
pier table construction
Pile
cap works
Portal
beam construction
Piling
Works for Viaduct
Piling
Works for Noise Barrier
Retaining
Wall construction
Road
works
Sewer
works
Slope
works
Utilities
Duct Laying
Water
Main Laying
Viaduct
segment erection
Erection
of temporary support for demolition of J-bridge
Footbridge
construction
Storm
drains laying
Noise
barrier construction
Pre-drilling
works and works for noise barrier
Boundary
wall for pumping station
Construction
of remaining slab of Box Culvert ID05
Demolition
of Valve Control House
Gabion
wall construction
Re-provisioning
of Kiu Tau Footbridge
Slope
reinstatement works near Bridge E
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.4.4
The
Contract was awarded in mid-April 2016 and the major construction work has not yet
commenced.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.4.5
Contract commenced in August 2013 and the construction works under Contract 5 was substantially
completed on 31 August 2016. The following
activities were conducted in the Reporting Period.
Bituminous
laying at existing Lin Ma Hang (LMH) road
Brick
laying at footpath at LMH road
Road
works (kerb & bituminous laying) at existing LMH
road
Installation
of Underground Utility (additional) at proposed and existing LMH road
Irrigation
system at existing LMH Road
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.4.6
Contract 6 has awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. In this Reporting Period,
construction activities conducted are listed below:
Slope
Works
Bored
Piling
Pile Cap
Construction
Bridge
Pier Construction
Bridge Segment Erection
Tunnel
Excavation
Sewage
Treatment Plant Construction
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.4.7
Contract 7 has awarded in December 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 15 February 2015. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
•
Piling Works for Bridge A,
C, D and E
•
Pile Caps Construction at
Bridges B, C and D
•
Column construction at
Bridge C
Contract SS C505
2.4.8
Contract SS C505 has awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
•
General Site Set-up
•
Building no.4, 5, 6, 9,
11 and 36 construction
•
Excavation waterproofing
works for Building no. 4, 6 & 11
•
Pile cap construction for
Building no.4,6&7
•
Tower crane operation and
erection
•
Disassembly of crawler
crane
•
Grouting and full core to
completed bored piles
•
Bridge construction works
including construction of bridge column, retaining wall, pile cap and pier
•
Underground drainage
works
•
Prototype ¡§A¡¨ and ¡§B¡¨ construction
works
•
Mock up for south
entrance double curve cladding
•
Formwork and falsework
for PTB¡¦s slab construction
•
Construction PTB M/F
& 1/F flat slab
•
Steel beam works for
maintenance platform for PTB
•
Pile cap construction for
PTB, including excavation and backfilling works
•
Bridge deck construction
for Bridges 1 - 5
•
Footing construction
2.5.1
In according to the EP, the required documents
have submitted to EPD for retention which listed in below:
Project
Layout Plans of Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and SS C505
Landscape
Plan
Topsoil
Management Plan
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Programme
Baseline
Monitoring Report (TCS00690/13/600/R0030v3) for the Project
Waste
Management Plan of the Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and SS C505
Contamination
Assessment Plan (CAP) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi Tung and
the workshops in Fanling
Contamination
Assessment Report (CAR) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi Tung and
the workshops in Fanling
Vegetation
Survey Report
Woodland
Compensation Plan
Habitat
Creation Management Plan
Wetland
Compensation Plan
2.5.2
Summary of
the relevant permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for the Project of each contracts are presented in Table 2-1.
Table
2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Item |
Description |
License/Permit
Status |
||||
Ref.
no. |
Effective Date |
Expiry Date |
||||
Contract 2 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref No.: 368864 |
31 Dec 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
North Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-652-D2523-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||
Mid-Vent Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2524-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||
South Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2526-01 |
9 Apr 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.WT00018374-2014 |
8 Oct 2014 |
30 Sep 2019 |
||
No.: W5/1I389 |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||
No. WT00023063-2015 |
18 Dec 2015 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||
No.: W5/1I392 |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7019105 |
8 Jan 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0077-16 |
07 Feb 2016 |
06 Aug 2016 |
||
GW-RN0199-16 |
24 Mar 2016 |
17 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0332-16 |
09 May 2016 |
08 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0359-16 |
20 May 2016 |
19 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0378-16 |
30 May 2016 |
29 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0451-16 |
24 Jun 2016 |
19 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0457-16 |
22 Jun 2016 |
14 Dec 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0435-16 |
27 Jun 2016 |
26 Dec 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0519-16 |
1 Aug 2016 |
30 Oct 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0543-16 |
18 Jul 2016 |
13 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0582-16 |
09 Aug 2016 |
08 Nov 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0590-16 |
09 Aug 2016 |
08 Nov 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0579-16 |
11 Aug 2016 |
07 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0604-16 |
11 Aug 2016 |
07 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0695-16 |
18 Sep 2016 |
17 Mar 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0700-16 |
20 Sep 2016 |
19 Feb 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0759-16 |
12 Oct 2016 |
11 Apr 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0780-16 |
27 Oct 2016 |
26 Dec 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0788-16 |
27 Oct 2016 |
26 Dec 2016 |
||||
6 |
Specified Process
License (Mortar
Plant Operation) |
L-3-251(1) |
12-Apr-2016 |
11-Apr-2021 |
||
Contract 3 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 362101 |
17 Jul 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number: No.:5113-634-C3817-01 |
7 Oct 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.:WT00016832 ¡V 2013 |
28 Aug 13 |
31 Aug 2018 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017914 |
2 Aug 13 |
Till Contract ends |
||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0064-16 |
16 Feb 2016 |
13 Aug 2016 |
||
GW-RN0098-16 |
1 Mar 2016 |
4 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0113-16 |
25 Feb 2016 |
24 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0139-16 |
2 Mar 2016 |
24 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0140-16 |
2 Mar 2016 |
24 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0158-16 |
8 Mar 2016 |
31 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0170-16 |
11 Mar 2016 |
10 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0218-16 |
6 Apr 2016 |
30 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0233-16 |
11 Apr 2016 |
10 Oct 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0305-16 |
5 May 2016 |
4 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0307-16 |
10 May 2016 |
9 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0308-16 |
10 May 2016 |
9 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0309-16 |
30 Apr 2016 |
29 Oct 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0414-16 |
18 Jun 2016 |
17 Dec 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0419-16 |
21 Jun 2016 |
30 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0421-16 |
21 Jun 2016 |
30 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0434-16 |
22 Jun 2016 |
21 Dec 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0446-16 |
24 June 2016 |
31 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0509-16 |
16 Jul 2016 |
31 Aug 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0514-16 |
16 Jul 2016 |
15 Oct 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0525-16 |
20 Jul 2016 |
7 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0541-16 |
5 Aug 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0549-16 |
30 Jul 2016 |
9 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0557-16 |
8 Aug 2016 |
30 Sep 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0561-16 |
16 Aug 2016 |
11 Feb 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0580-16 |
25 Aug 2016 |
24 Feb 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0581-16 |
25 Aug 2016 |
24 Feb 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0596-16 |
17 Aug 2016 |
15 Feb 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0606-16 |
27 Aug 2016 |
2 Oct 2016 |
||||
GW-RN0619-16 |
22 Aug 2016 |
14 Feb 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0646-16 |
10 Sep 2016 |
9 Mar 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0649-16 |
3 Sep 2016 |
7 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0653-16 |
11 Sep 2016 |
10 Mar 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0654-16 |
15 Sep 2016 |
14 Mar 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0708-16 |
8 Oct 2016 |
28 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0711-16 |
1 Oct 2016 |
13 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0720-16 |
4 Oct 2016 |
31 Mar 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0729-16 |
5 Oct 2016 |
31 Mar 2017 |
||||
|
|
GW-RN0756-16 |
18 Oct 2016 |
13 Apr 2017 |
||
Contract 5 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 359338 |
13 May 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-642-S3735-01 |
8 Jun 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: W5/1G44/1 |
8 Jun 13 |
30 Jun 2018 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017351 |
29 Apr 13 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
Contract 6 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390614 |
29 Jun 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-652-C3969-01 |
31 Aug 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022707 |
9 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
4 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.:WT00024574-2016 |
31 May 2016 |
31 May 2021 |
||
No.:WT00024576-2016 |
31 May 2016 |
31 May 2021 |
||||
No.:WT00024742-2016 |
14
June 2016 |
30
June 2021 |
||||
No.:WT00024746-2016 |
14
June 2016 |
30
June 2021 |
||||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0396-16 |
5 June 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
||
PP-RN0020-16 |
16 Jul 2016 |
14 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0520-16 |
23 Jul 2016 |
22 Jan 2017 |
||||
Contract SS C505 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390974 |
13 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5213-642-L1048-07 |
16 Sep 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: WT00024865-2016 |
8 Jul 2016 |
30 Nov 2020 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022831 |
23 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0396-16 |
5 June 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
||
PP-RN0020-16 |
16 Jul 2016 |
14 Jan 2017 |
||||
GW-RN0520-16 |
23 Jul 2016 |
22 Jan 2017 |
||||
Contract
7 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 397015 |
21 Dec 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5214-641-K3202-01 |
24 Mar 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: WT00024422-2016 |
10 May 2016 |
31 May 2021 |
||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7024129 |
21 Jan 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0538-16 |
23 Jul 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
||
Contract 4 |
||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Form of
Notification of Construction work has submitted to EPD in July 2016. |
||||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Application is under
preparation |
||||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
Application is under
preparation |
||||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Application is under
preparation |
||||
3.1.1
The Environmental Monitoring and Audit requirements
are set out in the Approved EM&A manual. Environmental issues such as air
quality, construction noise and water quality were identified as the key issues
during the construction phase of the Project.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the
sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The EM&A program of construction phase
monitoring shall cover the following environmental issues:
•
Air quality;
•
Construction noise; and
•
Water quality
3.2.2
A summary of the monitoring parameters is
presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Environmental
Issue |
Parameters |
Air
Quality |
1-hour
TSP by Real-Time Portable Dust Meter; and 24-hour
TSP by High Volume Air Sampler. |
Noise |
Leq(30min) in normal working days (Monday to
Saturday) 07:00-19:00 except public holiday; and 3 sets
of consecutive Leq(5min) on
restricted hours i.e. 19:00 to 07:00 next day, and whole day of public
holiday or Sunday Supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and
L90 shall also be obtained for reference. |
Water
Quality |
In-situ
Measurements Dissolved
Oxygen Concentration (mg/L); Dissolved
Oxygen Saturation (% ); Turbidity
(NTU); pH unit; Water
depth (m); and Temperature
(¢J). |
Laboratory Analysis Suspended
Solids (mg/L) |
3.3.1
The designated monitoring locations as
recommended in the EM&A Manual
are shown in Appendix C.
As the access to some of the designated monitoring locations was
questionable due to safety reason or denied by the landlords, alternative
locations therefore have had proposed. The proposed alternative monitoring
locations has updated in the revised EM&A Programme
which verified by IEC and certified by ET Leader prior submitted to EPD on 10
July 2013. Table 3-2, Table
3-3 and Table 3-4 are respectively listed the air quality, construction
noise and water quality monitoring locations for the Project and a map showing
these monitoring stations is presented in Appendix D.
Table
3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
AM1b^ |
Open area at Tsung
Yuen Ha Village |
BCP |
SS C505 Contract 5 Contract 7 |
AM2 |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang
Road |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
AM3 |
Ta Kwu
Ling Fire Service Station of Ta Kwu Ling Village. |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
AM4b^ |
House no. 10B1 Nga Yiu Ha Village |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 6 |
AM5a^ |
Ping Yeung Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM6 |
Wo Keng
Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM7b@ |
Loi Tung Village House |
Sha Tau Kok
Road |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
AM8 |
Po Kat Tsai Village No. 4 |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
AM9b# |
Nam Wa
Po Village House No. 80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM9a to AM9b was submitted to EPD on 4 Nov 2013 after
verified by the IEC and it was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (15) in EP
2/N7/A/52 Pt.10 dated 8 Nov 2013).
@ Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM7a to AM7b was submitted to EPD on 4 June 2014 after
verified by the IEC. It was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (7) in EP 2/N7/A/52
Pt.12 dated 9 Jun 2014).
^ Proposal for change of air quality monitoring
locations was enclosed in the updated EM&A Programme
which approval by EPD on 29 Mar 2016.
Table
3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
NM1 |
Tsung Yuen Ha Village House
No. 63 |
BCP |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 Contract 7 |
NM2a# |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang Road |
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
NM3 |
Ping Yeung Village House (facade facing northeast) |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM4 |
Wo Keng Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM5 |
Village House, Loi Tung |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM6 |
Tai Tong Wu Village House 2 |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM7 |
Po Kat Tsai Village |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
NM8 |
Village House, Tong Hang |
Fanling |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
NM9 |
Village House, Kiu Tau
Village |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
NM10 |
Nam Wa Po Village House No.
80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of construction
noise monitoring location from NM2 to NM2a was verified by the IEC on 6 May
2016 and was effective on 9 May 2016.
Table
3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Coordinates of Designated / Alternative Location |
Nature of the location |
Related to the Work Contract |
|
WM1 |
Downstream of Kong Yiu Channel |
833 679 |
845 421 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 51m of the designated location |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
WM1- Control |
Upstream of Kong Yiu Channel |
834 185 |
845 917 |
NA |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
WM2A |
Downstream of River
Ganges |
834 204 |
844 471 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 81m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2A- Controlx# |
Upstream of River
Ganges |
835 377 |
844 188 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 160m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2B |
Downstream of River
Ganges |
835 433 |
843 397 |
NA |
Contract 6 |
WM2B- Control |
Upstream of River
Ganges |
835 835 |
843 351 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 31m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM3x# |
Downstream of River
Indus |
836 206 |
842 270 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 180m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
WM3- Control |
Upstream of River
Indus |
836 763 |
842 400 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 26m of the designated location |
Contract 2# Contract 6 |
WM4 |
Downstream of Ma Wat
Channel |
833 850 |
838 338 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 11m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control A |
Kau Lung Hang Stream |
834 028 |
837 695 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 28m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control B |
Upstream of Ma Wat
Channel |
833760 |
837395 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 15m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
# EPD has approved the
revised EM&A Programme on 29th March 2016. If the measured water depth of the monitoring
station is lower than 150 mm, alternative location (WM3x and WM2A-Controlx)
based on the criteria were selected to perform water monitoring in accordance
with the updated EM&A Programme (Rev.05) (Section
4.1.4)
3.4.1
The requirements of
impact monitoring are stipulated in Sections
2.1.6, 3.1.5 and 4.1.6 of the
approved EM&A Manual and
presented as follows.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.4.2
Frequency of impact
air quality monitoring is as follows:
1-hour TSP |
3 times every six
days during course of works |
24-hour TSP |
Once every 6 days during course of works. |
Noise Monitoring
3.4.3
One set of Leq(30min)
as 6 consecutive Leq(5min)
between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays and once every week during course of works. If construction work necessary to carry
out at other time periods, i.e. restricted time period (19:00 to 07:00 the next
morning and whole day on public holidays) (hereinafter referred as ¡§the
restricted hours¡¨), 3 consecutive Leq(5min) measurement will depended CNP requirements to
undertake. Supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results such as
L10 and L90 shall also be obtained for reference.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.4.4
The water quality monitoring frequency shall
be 3 days per week during course of works.
The interval between two sets of monitoring shall not be less than 36
hours.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.5.1
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. If the ET proposes to use a direct
reading dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP levels, it shall submit sufficient
information to the IEC to approve.
3.5.2
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement shall be determined by HOKLAS
accredited laboratory.
3.5.3
All equipment to be used for air quality
monitoring is listed in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-Hour
TSP |
|
High
Volume Air Sampler |
TISCH
High Volume Air Sampler, HVS Model TE-5170 |
Calibration
Kit |
TISCH
Model TE-5025A |
1-Hour TSP |
|
Portable Dust Meter |
Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass
Profiler & Counter |
Wind Data
Monitoring Equipment
3.5.4
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
wind data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging
wind speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location shall
be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
1)
The wind sensors should be installed 10 m
above ground so that they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by
buildings.
2)
The wind data should be captured by a data
logger. The data shall be downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
3)
The wind data monitoring equipment should be
re-calibrated at least once every six months.
4)
Wind direction should be divided into 16
sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
3.5.5
ET has liaised with the landlords of the
successful granted HVS installation premises. However, the owners rejected to provide
premises for wind data monitoring equipment installation.
3.5.6
Under this situation, the ET proposed
alternative methods to obtain representative wind data. Meteorological information as extracted
from ¡§the Hong Kong Observatory Ta Kwu Ling Station¡¨
is alternative method to obtain representative wind data. For Ta Kwu
Ling Station, it is located nearby the Project site. Moreover, this station is located at 15m
above mean sea level while its anemometer is located at 13m above the existing
ground which in compliance with the general setting up requirement. Furthermore, this station also can be to
provide the humidity, rainfall, and air pressure and temperature etc.
meteorological information. In Hong
Kong of a lot development projects, weather information extracted from Hong
Kong Observatory is common alternative method if weather station installation
not allowed.
Noise Monitoring
3.5.7
Sound
level meter in compliance with the International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1)
specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise monitoring. The sound level meter shall be checked
using an acoustic calibrator. The
wind speed shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of
measuring the wind speed in m s-1.
3.5.8
Noise monitoring equipment to be used for
monitoring is listed in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
B&K
Type 2238 or Rion NL-31or Rion
NL-52 |
Calibrator |
B&K
Type 4231 or Rion NC-74 or Cesvs
CB-5 |
Portable Wind Speed Indicator |
Testo Anemometer |
3.5.9
Sound level meters listed above comply with
the International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications, as recommended in TM issued
under the NCO. The acoustic
calibrator and sound level meter to be used in the impact monitoring will be
calibrated yearly.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.5.10 DO and water temperature should be measured in-situ by a DO/temperature
meter. The instrument should be portable and weatherproof using a DC power source.
It should have a membrane electrode
with automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. The equipment
should be capable of measuring:
•
DO level in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200%
saturation; and
•
temperature of between 0 and 45 degree Celsius.
3.5.11 A portable pH meter capable of measuring a range between 0.0 and 14.0
should be provided to measure pH under the specified conditions accordingly to
the APHA Standard Methods.
3.5.12 The instrument should be portable and weatherproof using a DC power
source. It should have a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity
between 0-1000 NTU.
3.5.13 A
portable, battery-operated echo sounder or tape measure will be used for the
determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station as
appropriate.
3.5.14 A water
sampler e.g. Kahlsico Water Sampler, which is a
transparent PVC cylinder with capacity not less than 2 litres,
will be used for water sampling if water depth over than 0.5m. For sampling from very shallow
water depths e.g. <0.5 m, water sample collection will be directly from
water surface below 100mm use sampling plastic bottle to avoid inclusion of
bottom sediment or humus. Moreover,
Teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling buckets maybe used for
water sampling. The equipment used
for sampling will be depended the sampling location and depth situations.
3.5.15 Water
samples for laboratory measurement of SS will be collected in high density
polythene bottles, packed in ice (cooled to 4 ºC without being frozen), and
delivered to the laboratory in the same day as the samples were collected.
3.5.16 Analysis
of suspended solids should be carried out in a HOKLAS or other accredited
laboratory. Water samples of about 1L should be collected at the monitoring
stations for carrying out the laboratory suspended solids determination. The SS determination work should start
within 24 hours after collection of the water samples. The SS analyses should
follow the APHA Standard Methods 2540D
with Limit of Reporting of 2 mg/L.
3.5.17 Water
quality monitoring equipment used in the impact monitoring is listed in Table
3-7. Suspended solids (SS) analysis is
carried out by a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory, namely ALS Technichem
(HK) Pty Ltd.
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Depth Detector |
Eagle Sonar or tape
measures |
Water
Sampler |
A
2-litre transparent PVC cylinder with latex cups at both ends or teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling
bucket |
Thermometer
& DO meter |
YSI
Professional Plus / YSI PRO20 Handheld Dissolved Oxygen Instrument / YSI 550A
Multifunctional Meter/ YSI Professional DSS |
pH meter |
AZ8685 pH pen-style
meter / YSI Professional Plus / YSI 6820/650MDS /
YSI Professional DSS |
Turbidimeter |
Hach 2100Q / YSI Professional DSS/ YSI 6820/ 650MDS |
Sample
Container |
High
density polythene bottles (provided by laboratory) |
Storage Container |
¡¥Willow¡¦ 33-liter plastic cool box with Ice
pad |
1-hour TSP Monitoring
3.6.1
The 1-hour TSP monitor was a brand named ¡§Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass Profiler
& Counter¡¨ which is a portable, battery-operated laser photometer. The 1-hour TSP meter provides a real
time 1-hour TSP measurement based on 90o light scattering. The 1-hour TSP monitor consists of the
following:
(a.)
A pump to draw sample aerosol through the optic
chamber where TSP is measured;
(b.)
A sheath air system to isolate the aerosol in
the chamber to keep the optics clean for maximum reliability; and
(c.)
A built-in data logger compatible with
Windows based program to facilitate data collection, analysis and reporting.
3.6.2
The 1-hour TSP meter is used within the valid
period as follow manufacturer¡¦s Operation and Service Manual.
3.6.3
The equipment used for 24-hour TSP
measurement is Tisch
Environmental, Inc. Model TE-5170 TSP high volume air sampling system, which complied with EPA Code of Federal Regulation, Appendix B
to Part 50. The High Volume Air Sampler (HVS) consists of the following:
(a.)
An anodized aluminum shelter;
(b.)
A 8¡¨x10¡¨ stainless steel filter holder;
(c.)
A blower motor assembly;
(d.)
A continuous flow/pressure recorder;
(e.)
A motor speed-voltage control/elapsed time
indicator;
(f.)
A 7-day mechanical timer, and
(g.)
A power supply of 220v/50 Hz
3.6.4
The HVS is operated and calibrated on a
regular basis in accordance with the manufacturer¡¦s instruction using Tisch Calibration Kit Model TE-5025A. Calibration would carry out in two month
interval.
3.6.5
24-hour TSP is collected by the ET on filters
of HVS and quantified by a local HOKLAS accredited laboratory, ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd (ALS), upon receipt of the samples. The ET keep all the sampled 24-hour TSP
filters in normal air conditioned room conditions, i.e. 70% RH (Relative
Humidity) and 25oC, for six months prior to disposal.
3.6.6
Noise measurements were taken in terms of the
A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level (Leq)
measured in decibels dB(A). Supplementary statistical
results (L10 and L90) were also obtained for reference.
3.6.7
During
the monitoring, all noise measurements were performed with the meter set to
FAST response and on the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level
(Leq). Leq(30min)
in six consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
were used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700-1900
hours on weekdays; and also Leq(15min) in
three consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
is used as monitoring parameter for other time periods (e.g. during restricted
hours), if necessary.
3.6.8
Prior
of noise measurement, the accuracy of the sound level meter is checked using an
acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. The checking was
performed before and after the noise measurement.
Water Quality
3.6.9
Water
quality monitoring is conducted at the designated locations. The sampling
produce with the in-situ monitoring are presented as below:
Sampling Procedure
3.6.10 A Digital Global Positioning System (GPS) is used to identify the
designated monitoring stations prior to water sampling. A portable, battery-operated echo
sounder is used for the determination of water depth at each station. At each station, water sample would be
collected from 0.1m below water surface or the water surface to prevent the
river bed sediment for stirring.
3.6.11 The sample
container will be rinsed with a portion of the water sample. The water sample then will be
transferred to the high-density polythene
bottles as provided by the laboratory, labeled with a unique sample
number and sealed with a screw cap.
3.6.12 Before
sampling, general information such as the date and time of sampling, weather
condition as well as the personnel responsible for the monitoring would be
recorded on the field data sheet.
3.6.13 A ¡¥Willow¡¦
33-liter plastic cool box packed with ice will be used to preserve the water
samples prior to arrival at the laboratory for chemical determination. The water temperature of the cool box is
maintained at a temperature as close to 40C as possible without
being frozen. Samples collected are
delivered to the laboratory upon collection.
In-situ Measurement
3.6.14 Instrument
including YSI Professional Plus or YSI 6820/650MDS or YSI PRO20 Handheld
Dissolved Oxygen Instrument or YSI 550A Multifunctional Meter or YSI
Professional DSS is used for water
in-situ measures, which automates the measurements and data logging of
temperature, dissolved oxygen and dissolved oxygen saturation. Before
each round of monitoring, the dissolved oxygen probe would be calibrated by the
wet bulb method.
3.6.15 A portable AZ8685
pH pen-style meter or YSI Professional Plus or YSI 6820/650MDS is used for in-situ
pH measurement. The pH meter is
capable of measuring pH in the range of 0 ¡V 14 and readable to 0.1.
3.6.16 A portable Hach 2100Q Turbidimeter or YSI Professional DSS is used for in-situ
turbidity measurement. The turbidity meter is capable of measuring turbidity in
the range of 0 ¡V 1000 NTU. StablCal®
Standards of known NTU are used for calibration of the
instrument before and after measurement.
3.6.17 All
in-situ measurement equipment are calibrated by HOKLAS
accredited laboratory of three month interval.
Laboratory Analysis
3.6.18 All water samples are analyzed
with Suspended Solids (SS) as specified in the
EM&A Manual by a local HOKLAS-accredited testing laboratory (ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd HOKLAS registration no. 66).
SS analysis is
determined by the laboratory upon receipt of the water samples using APHA Standard Methods 2540D (namely ALS Method EA-025 as
accredited HOKLAS Scheme) started within 48
hours of water sample receipt.
3.7.1
Calibration of the HVS is performed upon
installation and thereafter at bimonthly intervals in accordance with the
manufacturer¡¦s instruction using the certified standard calibrator (TISCH Model
TE-5025A).
Moreover, the Calibration Kit would be
calibrated annually. The calibration data are properly documented and the
records are maintained by ET for future reference.
3.7.2
The 1-hour TSP
meter was calibrated by the supplier prior to purchase. Zero response of the equipment would be
checked before and after each monitoring event. Annually calibration with the High
Volume Sampler (HVS) in same condition would be undertaken by the Laboratory.
3.7.3
The sound level
meter and calibrator are calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited
under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme at yearly basis.
3.7.4
All water quality monitoring equipment is
calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month intervals.
3.7.5
The calibration certificates of all
monitoring equipment used for the impact monitoring program in the Reporting
Period and the HOKLAS accredited certificate of laboratory are presented in
the relevant monthly EM&A reports.
3.8.1
The baseline results form the basis for
determining the environmental acceptance criteria for the impact monitoring. According to the approved Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Manual, the air quality, construction noise and water
quality criteria were set up, namely Action and Limit levels are listed in Tables
3-8, 3-9 and 3-10.
Table 3-8 Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (mg /m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
||
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
|
AM1b |
265 |
143 |
500 |
260 |
AM2 |
268 |
149 |
||
AM3 |
269 |
145 |
||
AM4b |
267 |
148 |
||
AM5a |
268 |
143 |
||
AM6 |
269 |
148 |
||
AM7b |
275 |
156 |
||
AM8 |
269 |
144 |
||
AM9b |
271 |
151 |
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Monitoring Location |
Action Level |
Limit Level in dB(A) |
Time Period: 0700-1900 hours on normal
weekdays |
||
NM1, NM2a, NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8,
NM9, NM10 |
When one or more documented complaints are
received |
75 dB(A)Note 1 & Note 2 |
Note 1: Acceptable Noise Levels for school should be reduced to 70 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) during examination period
Note 2: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the NCA have to be followed.
Table 3-10 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameter |
Performance criteria |
Monitoring Location |
|||||
WM1 |
WM2A |
WM2B |
WM3 |
WM4 |
|||
DO
(mg/L) |
Action Level |
(*)4.23 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.74 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.14 |
|
Limit Level |
(#)4.19 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.60 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.08 |
||
Turbidity
(NTU) |
Action Level |
51.3 |
24.9 |
11.4 |
13.4 |
35.2 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of
the same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
67.6 |
33.8 |
12.3 |
14.0 |
38.4 |
||
AND
130% of upstream control
station of the same day |
|||||||
SS
(mg/L) |
Action Level |
54.5 |
14.6 |
11.8 |
12.6 |
39.4 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of the
same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
64.9 |
17.3 |
12.4 |
12.9 |
45.5 |
||
AND
130% of upstream control
station of the same day |
|||||||
Remarks: (*) The
Proposed Action Level of Dissolved Oxygen is adopted to be
used 5%-ile of baseline data (**) The Proposed Action & Limit Level of Dissolved Oxygen is used 4mg/L (#) The Proposed Limit Level of Dissolved Oxygen is adopted to be
used 1%-ile of baseline data |
|||||||
3.8.2
Should non-compliance of the environmental
quality criteria occurs, remedial actions will be triggered according to the
Event and Action Plan which presented in Appendix E.
3.9.1
All monitoring data will be handled by the ET¡¦s in-house data recording and management
system. The monitoring data recorded in the equipment
will be downloaded directly from the equipment at the end of each monitoring
day. The downloaded monitoring data
will input into a computerized database properly maintained by the ET. The laboratory results will be input
directly into the computerized database and checked by personnel other than
those who input the data.
3.9.2
For monitoring parameters that require laboratory
analysis, the local laboratory shall follow the QA/QC requirements as set out
under the HOKLAS scheme for the relevant laboratory tests.
4.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505
and air quality monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
4.2.1
Summary of air quality monitoring
results during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 4-1. The
relevant graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Monitoring Location |
1-hour TSP (µg/m3) |
24-hour TSP (µg/m3) |
||||
Max |
Min |
Mean |
Max |
Min |
Mean |
|
AM1b |
140 |
24 |
69 |
101 |
23 |
58 |
Record Date |
17-Oct-16 |
2-Aug-16 |
48 events |
27-Sep-16 |
18-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM2 |
170 |
26 |
75 |
191 |
37 |
101 |
Record Date |
17-Oct-16 |
2-Aug-16 |
48 events |
27-Sep-16 |
18-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM3 |
178 |
26 |
80 |
193 |
21 |
106 |
Record Date |
17-Oct-16 |
2-Aug-16 |
48 events |
27-Sep-16 |
18-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM4b |
129 |
24 |
72 |
63 |
20 |
42 |
Record Date |
30-Sep-16 |
18-Oct-16 |
48 events |
19-Sep-16 |
3-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM5a |
146 |
26 |
72 |
138 |
18 |
53 |
Record Date |
30-Sep-16 |
18-Oct-16 |
48 events |
29-Sep-16 |
1-Sep-16 |
16 events |
AM6 |
139 |
27 |
78 |
145 |
36 |
90 |
Record Date |
30-Sep-16 |
4-Aug-16 |
48 events |
29-Sep-16 |
3-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM7b |
200 |
25 |
87 |
124 |
32 |
63 |
Record Date |
29-Oct-16 |
18-Oct-16 |
48 events |
29-Sep-16 |
3-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM8 |
132 |
29 |
77 |
106 |
20 |
43 |
Record Date |
27-Aug-16 |
18-Oct-16 |
48 events |
29-Sep-16 |
3-Aug-16 |
16 events |
AM9b |
214 |
32 |
65 |
95 |
18 |
41 |
Record Date |
31-Aug-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
48 events |
6-Aug-16 |
5-Sep-16 |
16 events |
4.2.2
Breaches of air quality A/L levels and
statistical analysis of compliance for the air quality monitoring results are
summarized in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Air Quality A/L Levels
Location |
Exceedance |
1-hour TSP |
24- hour TSP |
Total |
AM1 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM2 |
Action Level |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM3 |
Action Level |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM4a |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM5a |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM6 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM7b |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM8 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM9b |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.2.3
In the
Reporting Period, all the 1-hour
TSP monitoring results were below the Action/Limit Levels. For 24-hour TSP monitoring, there were
two (2) Action level exceedances which recorded at AM2 and AM3. The investigation report (IR) conducted
by the ET was completed and submitted to relevant parties. The IR revealed that the exceedances
were not project related and therefore no remedial measures were proposed.
4.2.4
The summary of weather conditions during the Reporting
Period is presented in Appendix G.
5.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505 and
noise monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
5.2.1
The sound level meter was set in 1m from the
exterior of the building façade including noise monitoring locations NM1, NM2,
NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8 and NM9. No façade correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical principles and EPD
guidelines. However, free-field
status is performed at NM2a and NM10 and façade correction (+3 dB(A) has added according to the requirement.
5.2.2
Summary of noise monitoring results
during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 5-1. The
relevant graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
Table 5-1 Summary of Construction Noise
Monitoring Results
Monitoring
Location |
Leq, 30min (dB((A)) |
|
Max |
Min |
|
NM1 |
62 |
51 |
Record Date |
25-Aug-16 & 11-Oct-16 |
23-Sep-16 |
NM2/ NM2a(*) |
75 |
62 |
Record Date |
5-Oct-16 |
12-Sep-16 & 23-Sep-16 |
NM3 |
66 |
55 |
Record Date |
6-Oct-16 |
20-Sep-16 |
NM4 |
74 |
58 |
Record Date |
18-Oct-16 |
16-Aug-16 |
NM5 |
62 |
51 |
Record Date |
18-Oct-16 |
22-Aug-16 |
NM6 |
64 |
53 |
Record Date |
8-Sep-16 |
26-Sep-16 |
NM7 |
69 |
58 |
Record Date |
12-Oct-16 & 24-Oct-16 |
22-Aug-16 |
NM8 |
59 |
55 |
Record Date |
8-Aug-16, 12-Sep-16, 23-Sep-16, 11-Oct-16 & 17-Oct-16 |
25-Aug-16 |
NM9 |
66 |
61 |
Record Date |
12-Sep-16 |
2-Aug-16, 25-Aug-16 & 23-Sep-16 |
NM10(*) |
67 |
61 |
Record Date |
5-Oct-16 & 11-Oct-16 |
8-Aug-16, 19-Aug-16 & 12-Sep-16 |
(*) façade
correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical
principles and EPD guidelines
5.2.3
Breaches of construction noise A/L
levels and statistical analysis of compliance for construction noise monitoring
results are summarized in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Construction Noise A/L Levels
Station |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Received Date |
NM1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
NM2/ NM2a |
0 |
||
NM3 |
0 |
||
NM4 |
0 |
||
NM5 |
0 |
||
NM6 |
0 |
||
NM7 |
0 |
||
NM8 |
0 |
||
NM9 |
0 |
||
NM10 |
0 |
5.2.4
In
this Reporting Period, the noise level
measured at all designated monitoring locations were below 75dB(A).
No Limit Level exceedance was triggered and no corrective action was required.
5.2.5
Furthermore, there was no noise complaints (Action Level
exceedance) received by the RE, CEDD, Architect/AR/ and the Contractors in the
Reporting Period. Therefore, no
Action or Limit Level exceedance was triggered and no corrective action was
required.
5.3.1
In the Reporting
Period, CNPs were granted by Contracts 2, 3, 6 and 7 for use of Powered
Mechanical Equipment (PME) during restricted hour. As confirmed by both Contractors with
their works schedules, construction works would be conducted at Contract 6 and
7 during restricted hours with the granted CNP. Noise monitoring was therefore conducted
at the relevant noise monitoring locations during respective restricted hour
periods.
5.3.2
Based on the works schedule by the Contractor of Contracts 2, 3, 6
and 7, the involved noise monitoring locations included NM5, NM7, NM8, NM9 and
NM10.
Summary of noise monitoring results during the Reporting Period are
tabulated in Table 5-3. The relevant graphical plots throughout
the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
Table 5-3 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results for Restricted Hours
Monitoring
Location |
Evening (Leq5min), dB(A) |
Night time Leq
(Leq5min), dB(A) |
||
Max |
Min |
Max |
Min |
|
NM5 |
48 |
45 |
47 |
46 |
Record Date |
23-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-16 |
23 and 28 Oct 16 |
NM7 |
52 |
47 |
51 |
49 |
Record Date |
28-Oct-16 |
23-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-16 |
NM8 |
63 |
58 |
64 |
56 |
Record Date |
28-Oct-16 |
23-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-16 |
NM9 |
66.3 |
66.3 |
64 |
60 |
Record Date |
23-Oct-16 |
23-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
NM10(*) |
59 |
59 |
59 |
56 |
Record Date |
23-Oct-16 |
23-Oct-16 |
23-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
Remarks: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the NCA have to be followed.
(*) façade
correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical
principles and EPD guidelines
5.3.3
According to the site
records by the monitoring team, no construction noise from the construction was
noted during the course of monitoring at all locations. On the other hand, traffic noise was
dominated at NM8 and NM9 since the monitoring locations were closed to the
train tracks and very serious dogs barking were recorded at NM10. Therefore, it is considered that the
measurement results were likely to be the background noise.
6.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project has been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505
and water quality monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
6.2.1
Summary of monitoring results during the
Reporting Period are tabulated in Tables
6-1 and 6-4. The relevant
graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
6.2.2
In accordance with ¡§Event
and Action Plan¡¨, the water quality monitoring
frequency shall be increased to daily when exceedance recorded at the exceeded
monitoring location. In the Reporting Period, 40 days of scheduled water monitoring were
conducted. Moreover, 1, 14, 6, 4 and 3 days of extra water sampling were
conducted for WM1, WM2A(a), WM2B, WM3 and WM4 and all its control
station.
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 5
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
|
Min |
5.4 |
5.6 |
10.3 |
7.3 |
2 |
<2 |
Max |
7.7 |
8.2 |
361 |
308.5 |
1055 |
919.5 |
Average |
7.1 |
7.1 |
52.3 |
32.9 |
68.6 |
51.5 |
Table 6-2 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 3
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
||||||
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
|
Min |
6.2 |
6.0 |
5.0 |
4.7 |
3.3 |
4.7 |
7.5 |
2 |
6 |
Max |
7.8 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
561.5 |
522.5 |
99.7 |
536 |
539 |
220 |
Average |
7.0 |
7.3 |
6.7 |
60.3 |
27.8 |
25.7 |
48.4 |
24.8 |
22.6 |
Table 6-3 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 6
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||||||||
WM2A(a) |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
WM2A(a) |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
WM2A(a) |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
|
Min |
5.8 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
4.5 |
8.3 |
4 |
2.9 |
1.6 |
2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
Max |
7.7 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
547.5 |
525.5 |
>999 |
91.2 |
883 |
340 |
1720 |
96 |
Average |
7.0 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
6.3 |
95.0 |
27.8 |
30.3 |
8.1 |
89.2 |
22.4 |
106.1 |
14.7 |
Table 6-4 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 6
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
|
Min |
5.5 |
5.1 |
6.4 |
1.8 |
7 |
<2 |
Max |
7.8 |
7.7 |
>999 |
>999 |
1470 |
13100 |
Average |
6.8 |
6.5 |
51.1 |
59.5 |
93.4 |
423.0 |
6.2.3
Breaches of water quality A/L levels and
statistical analysis of compliance for the water quality monitoring results are
summarized in Tables 6-5.
Table 6-5 Summaries
of Breaches of the Existing Water Quality A/L Levels
Reporting Period |
No. of sampling day |
Location |
DO (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
SS (mg/L) |
|||
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
|||
Aug-16 |
14 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
13 |
|
18 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
7 |
|
14 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
14 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Sep-16 |
14 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
11 |
|
14 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
15 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
13 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oct-16 |
13 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
|
14 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
15 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
16 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
|
Total |
41 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
54 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
0 |
34 |
|
46 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
12 |
|
44 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
|
43 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
|
Sum |
0 |
0 |
2 |
41 |
1 |
56 |
6.2.4
In the Reporting Period, a total of 100 Action
Level (AL)/ Limit Level (LL) exceedances namely 43 AL/LL exceedances of turbidity
and 57 LL exceedances of SS were recorded. NOEs
were issued to relevant parties upon confirmation of the
results.
6.2.5
Investigation
reports for the exceedance were conducted by the ET and the investigation
results revealed that 4 out of 100 exceedances were related to the works under the project. The detailed investigation
reports are summarized
in Table 6-6 and presented in the relevant
monthly EM&A reports.
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Date of Exceedance |
Location |
Exceeded Parameter |
Investigation Result |
2, 3 and 4 August 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
Typhoon No.8 was hoisted on 2 August 2016 morning and
heavy rain was recorded on 2 and 3 August 2016. On 2 and 3 August 2016, it was
observed that water releasing from the rubber dam after heavy rain and the
rubber dam was not belong to C6. The water flow of the river became very
vigorous and stirred up the loose sediment at the river bed. It is concluded that the exceedances
on 2 and 3 August 2016 were related to vigorous flow disturbing the sediment
at the river when water releasing from the rubber dam. For exceedances on 4 August 2016, it
is considered the exceedances were related to the unknown source of turbid
water seeping out from the river bed. In our
investigation, it is considered that the exceedance was not likely caused by
the Project. |
10, 11 and 12 August 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
According to the Hong Kong Observatory, there was heavy
rainstorm on 10 August 2016 and occasionally shower on 11 and 12 August 2016. On 10 August 2016, turbid
water was observed throughout the stream course due to vigorous flow and
stirred up of the sediment. On 11
and 12 August, unknown source of turbid
water seeping out from the river bed was observed. In our
investigation, it is considered that the exceedance was not likely caused by
the Project. |
2, 3 and 4 August 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
Typhoon No.8 was hoisted on 2 August 2016 morning and
heavy rain was recorded on 2 and 3 August 2016. According to the site
observations from the monitoring team on 2, 3 and 4 August 2016, the water
flow in the channel was very vigorous due to heavy rain and it stirred up
some silt and sediment at the river bed. Moreover, there was trails of muddy
water flowing from the adjacent road into the channel resulted from rain. In our investigation, it is considered
that the exceedances were due to the disturbance of silt and sediment during
sampling and runoff from road and not likely caused by the Project. |
10 August 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
According to the site observations from the
monitoring team on 10 August 2016, the water flow in the channel as well as WM2B
and WM2B-c was very vigorous due to heavy rain and turbid water was observed
throughout the channel. Moreover, there was trails of turbid water flowing from the adjacent
road into the channel resulted from rain. In our
investigation, it is considered that the exceedance was due rainstorm and
runoff from road and not likely caused by the Project. |
18, 19 and 22 August 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
According to the Hong Kong Observatory, there was
rainstorm recorded on 18 to 22 August 2016. Due to continuous rainfall, large
amount of surface muddy runoff generated from the surrounding environment has
been flowing into existing stream.
The muddy runoff resulted in slurry and mud accumulated in the river
bed. In our investigation, the exceedance was due to surface runoff and mud
from the surrounding environmental under rainstorm and
not likely caused by the Project. |
23 and 24 August 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
According to the site observations from the
monitoring team on 23 and 24 August 2016, the water at WM2B was visually
clear though some obvious silt and sediment was found at the river bed. No abnormality was observed by the
monitoring Team. Since the
sampling was conducted at shallow water (water depth <0.03m), it is
considered that the exceedances were due to the disturbance of silt and
sediment during sampling and not likely caused by the Project. |
18, 19, 20, 22 August 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
According to the HKO, there was rainstorm recorded
on 18 to 22 August 2016. Due to
continuous rainfall, large amount of surface muddy runoff generated from the
surrounding environment has been flowing into existing stream. The muddy runoff resulted in slurry
and mud accumulated in the river bed.
According to the photo recorded and monitoring data, the water quality
at control station WM2A-C was also affected by the rainfall, particularly on
18 and 19 August 2016. In our
investigation, it is considered the exceedance was due to surface runoff and
mud from the surrounding environmental under rainstorm and unlikely caused by
the works under the project. |
23, 24 and 31 August 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
In our investigation, the water mitigation measures
implemented on site was in order and there were no rain recorded on 23, 24
and 31 August 2016 and therefore muddy runoff from the site was not likely to
occur. It is considered
the
exceedances were due to
natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the project. |
6, 8 and 10 Sep 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
For exceedances on 6 & 8 Sep 2016,
it is considered that the exceedances were due to the disturbance of silt and
sediment during sampling and not likely caused by the Project. •
For exceedance on 10 Sep 2016, there was rain
before the monitoring and the water quality at upstream WM2B-C was also
affected by rain. It is
considered the exceedance was not related to works under the Project. |
6, 7, 8 and 9 Sep 2016 |
WM2A (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
As reported by CCKJV, the water pipe
carrying untreated water to the wastewater treatment facilities SH-08 was
burst on 6 September 2016 and it had repaired immediately. It is considered that the exceedances
on 6 September 2016 were related to the pipe burst incident and
exceedance on 7 September 2016 was due to the residual impact of pipe burst
incident. •
During site inspection, the water mitigation measures
implemented on site was in order and no adverse water impact was
identified. It is
considered the exceedances on 8 and 9 September 2016 were due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the
works under the project. |
8 Sep 2016 |
WM3x (C2 and C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
Muddy water cumulated at Ng Tung River
was observed out of the site boundary on 8 September 2016. It was suspected that muddy water was
come from upstream after heavy rain on 7 September 2016. In our investigation, the water
mitigation measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse water
impact was identified. It is
considered the exceedances were likely caused by residue silt and sediment
after heavy rain on 7 September 2016 and no related to the works under Contracts
2 and 6. |
10 Sep 2016 |
WM1 (C6 and SS C505) |
NTU &SS |
•
Heavy rainfall (total rainfall 53.2mm)
was recorded on 10 September 2016 and muddy water was also observed
throughout the channel such as upstream of the work area
of Contract 6. It is
considered that the exceedances were unlikely due to the works under Contract
SS C505 and Contract 6. |
12 and 13 Sep 2016 |
WM2A (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
On 12 September 2016, water
releasing from the loose Nylon Dam was observed and released water should be
come from heavy rain at the day before.
When water releasing from the dam, water flow of the river became very
vigorous and stirred up the loose sediment at the river bed. In view of the impact after rain and
the water mitigation measures implemented on site, it is considered the
exceedances on 12 September 2016 were related to sediment stirred up at the
river bed when water loose from Nylon Dam whereas exceedances on 13 September
2016 were due to natural variation.
|
20, 21 and 22 Sep 2016 |
WM2A (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
In our investigation, the water
mitigation measures implemented on site and the function of the wastewater
treatment facilities was in order and no adverse water impact was observed
during site inspection. It is
considered the exceedances were unlikely caused by the works under the
project. |
28 and 30 Sep 2016 (last reporting month) |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
SS |
•
Inspection was carried out align the
existing river course of upstream of WM3x and it was observed that the river
water adjacent the construction site was clear and no muddy discharge from
the site was observed. •
The monitored drainage channel also
collected the rain water from the Sha Tau Kok road
surface via open drain and communal channel and it is believed that the water
quality at monitored channel was affected by rain. In our investigation, it is considered
that the exceedances were unlikely caused by the works under the Project. |
4, 5 and 11 Oct 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
As reported by CCKJV, a fresh water pipe at Ping Yeung
Interchange was damaged in the morning of 4 October 2016. CCKJV was promptly
repaired the pipe which completed by noon of 4 October 2016. However, some
muddy runoff was generated due to the damaged pipe and it was accidentally
got into the adjacent Ping Yuen River. It is considered that the exceedances
on 4 October 2016 were related to the pipe damage incident. •
During weekly site inspection, water quality mitigation
measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse water impact was
identified. It is
considered the exceedances were due to natural variation and unlikely caused
by the works under the project. |
8 Oct 2016 |
WM3x (C2 and C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
Inspection was carried out align the
existing river course of upstream of WM3x and it was observed that the river
water adjacent the construction site was clear and no muddy discharge from
the site was observed. •
Since there were no source of muddy
water found from construction site and the wastewater treatment facilities
and mitigation measures were properly maintained as observed during regularly
site inspection. It is considered
that the exceedances were due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the
works under the Project. |
11, 12, 13, 18 and 20 Oct 2016 |
WM4 (C2 and C3) |
NTU &SS |
•
Inspection was carried out at upstream area of
impact station WM4 to investigate the source of muddy water. Muddy water was found flowing from the
river branch near Kiu Tau Road. There was active
construction site of other Contractor near Kiu Tak Road and muddy water was observed outside their site
area and the underpass drain near that construction site. •
During weekly site inspection, the
condition was generally in order and no adverse water quality impacts under
the Contract were identified. In
our investigation, it is considered that exceedances were due to the muddy
water from the outside of site boundary and not likely related to the works
under the Project. |
18 Oct 2016 |
WM3x (C2 and C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
In our investigation, it is considered
that the water quality in the channel on 18 October 2016 was
deteriorated by heavy rain due to vigorous water flow and stir up
sediment. Moreover, the
monitored drainage channel near WM3x would be collected the rain water from
the Sha Tau Kok road surface via open drain and
communal channel. It is concluded
that the exceedances were likely due to rain and not caused by the works
under the Project. |
20, 22 and 24 Oct 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
According to the rainfall record from the Hong Kong
Observatory (HKO), there was black rainstorm on 19 October 2016. Muddy water generated from runoff from
the surrounding environment and thick sediment was cumulated at the river bed
and trapped at the nylon dam. On
20 October 2016, water releasing from the loose nylon dam was observed and
muddy water was generated under vigorous water flow and stir up sediment. On 22 and 24 October 2016,
washing out of soil from a greenfield outside the
site area was observed which affecting the water quality in the river course. •
In our investigation, the implementation of water
mitigation measures was in order.
It is considered that the exceedances on 20 October 2016 was due to
residual impact after rainstorm and not caused by the works under the
Contract. For exceedances on 22
and 24 October 2016, it is considered that the water quality was affected by
runoff from the surrounding farm and unlikely caused by the Contract. |
18, 19 and 20 Oct 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
On 18 and 19 October 2016, the water
flow in the channel was very vigorous due to heavy rain and turbid water was
observed throughout the channel.
Moreover, there were trails of muddy runoff getting into the existing
river channel from the adjacent public road due to rainstorm. •
On 20 October 2016, there were no muddy
water discharged from the site, it is considered that the exceedances were
due to the disturbance of silt and sediment at the channel bed during
sampling at shallow water. It is considered
that the exceedances were not likely caused by the Project. |
25, 28, 29 and 31 Oct 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
•
The IR revealed that the water
mitigation measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse water
impact was identified. Moreover,
there were no rain recorded during the exceedance days and surface runoff
generated from the site area was unlikely to occur. It is considered the exceedances were
due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the project. |
7.1.1
Ecology monitoring for woodland compensation
was conducted on 30 September 2016. The Monitoring Report for
Woodland Compensation will be prepared and submitted as a stand-alone report as
supplementary for the EM&A Report.
8.1.1
Waste management was carried out by an
on-site Environmental Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time.
8.2.1
All types of waste arising from the
construction work are classified into the following:
l
Construction & Demolition (C&D)
Material;
l
Chemical Waste;
l
General Refuse
8.2.2
Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable. The
quantities of waste for disposal in the Reporting Period are summarized in Tables
8-1 and 8-2 and the Waste Flow Table is presented in Appendix H.
Table 8-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Type of Waste |
Contract No |
Quantity |
Disposal
Location |
|||
Aug 2016 |
Sep 2016 |
Oct 2016 |
Total |
|||
C&D Materials (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
88.4693 |
97.0232 |
92.8467 |
404.0952 |
- |
3 |
0.582 |
1.797 |
1.115 |
- |
||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
- |
||
6 |
45.652 |
31.086 |
36.479 |
- |
||
7 |
0.464 |
0.207 |
0 |
|
||
SS C505 |
4.247 |
2.963 |
1.164 |
- |
||
Reused in this Project (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
0.1268 |
1.5359 |
0.8666 |
42.9593 |
- |
3 |
0 |
0.258 |
0.177 |
- |
||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
- |
||
6 |
6.653 |
20.89 |
5.359 |
- |
||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
SS C505 |
4.182 |
2.911 |
0 |
- |
||
Reused in other Projects (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
27.0545 |
50.8682 |
39.8733 |
145.001 |
C6/ NENT# & other projects approved by the ER |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
|
||
6 |
5.933 |
11.529 |
9.743 |
C5 & other projects approved by the ER |
||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
Disposal as Public
Fill (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
61.2879 |
44.6191 |
52.1068 |
233.7588 |
Tuen Mun 38 TKO 137 |
3 |
0.494 |
0.935 |
0.453 |
|||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
|||
6 |
33.066 |
17.468 |
21.377 |
|||
7 |
0.464 |
0.207 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.065 |
0.052 |
1.164 |
Remark:
(#)The C&D materials were delivered to
NENT for reuse by laying cover of the landfilling area.
Since major construction activities under
Contractor 5 have been substantially completed on 31 August 2016, no data was
presented for Sep 2016 and Oct 2016.
Table 8-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Type of Waste |
Contract No |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
|||
Aug 2016 |
Sep 2016 |
Oct 2016 |
Total |
|||
Recycled Metal (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
23.0 |
0 |
0 |
1826.405+0.001# |
By licensed
collector |
3 |
0 |
0.001 |
0 |
|||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|||
SS C505 |
242.37 |
572.150 |
988.585 |
|||
Recycled Paper / Cardboard Packing (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.21 |
By licensed
collector |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.36 |
0.37 |
0.36 |
|||
Recycled
Plastic (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.174+ 0.005# |
By licensed collector |
3 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
|||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.025 |
0.048 |
0.098 |
|||
Chemical
Wastes (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
4.9280 |
4.4000 |
0 |
10.803+ 0.8# |
By licensed collector |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.800 |
|||
5 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
1.475 |
|||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
General
Refuses (¡¥000m3) |
2 |
0.1482 |
0.2018 |
0.1852 |
1.7622 |
NENT |
3 |
0.105 |
0.090 |
0.120 |
|||
5 |
0.02 |
NA |
NA |
|||
6 |
0.110 |
0.049 |
0.075 |
|||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.228 |
0.241 |
0.189 |
Remark:
(#) Unit of recycled
metal, recycled paper/ cardboard packing, recycled plastic and chemical waste
for Contractor 3 was in (¡¥000m3).
Since major construction activities under
Contractor 5 have been substantially completed on 31 August 2016, no data was presented
for Sep 2016 and Oct 2016.
8.2.3
To control the site performance on waste management, the
Contractor shall ensure that all solid and liquid waste management works are
fully in compliance with the relevant license/permit requirements, such as the
effluent discharge license and the chemical waste producer registration. The Contractor is also reminded to
implement the recommended environmental mitigation measures according to the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Manual.
9.1.1
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
the environmental site inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Weekly environmental site inspections should
carry out to confirm the environmental performance.
Contract 2
9.1.2
During
the Reporting Period, 12 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken
at Contract 2 to evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-1 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-1 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 2
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
August 2016 |
5, 12, 19 and 26 August 2016 |
2 |
Completed |
September 2016 |
2, 9, 14, 23
and 30 September 2016 |
6 |
Completed |
October 2016 (#) |
7, 14 and 28
October 2016 |
5 |
Completed |
Remark (#): Site inspection scheduled on 21 Oct 2016 was cancelled due to typhoon signal No. 8.
9.1.3
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 13 observations/ reminders were recorded
during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly
site inspection were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Contract 3
9.1.4
During
the Reporting Period, 14
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 3 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
9-2 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 9-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 3
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
August 2016 |
1, 8, 15, 24 and 29 August 2016 |
8 |
Completed |
September 2016 |
5, 12, 21 and
26 September 2016 |
3 |
Completed |
October 2016 |
3, 11, 19, 24
and 31 October 2016 |
4 |
Completed |
9.1.5
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 15
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general rectified
within the specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Contract 5
9.1.6
During
the Reporting Period, 5
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract 5 to evaluate
the site environmental performance.
The summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Table
9-3 and the details of site inspection can be
found in relevant EM&A monthly report.
Table 9-3 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 5
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
|
August 2016 |
3, 10, 17, 24,
31 May 2016 |
1 |
Completed |
September 2016 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
October 2016 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
9.1.7
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 1
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract 6
9.1.8
During
the Reporting Period, 13 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken
at Contract 6 to evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-4 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-4 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 6
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
August 2016 |
4, 11, 18 and 25 August 2016 |
7 |
Completed |
September 2016 |
1, 8, 15, 22
and 29 September 2016 |
5 |
Completed |
October 2016 |
6, 13, 20 and
27 October 2016 |
3 |
Completed |
9.1.9
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 15
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract SS
C505
9.1.10
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract SS C505 to
evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-5 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-5 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract SS C505
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
August 2016 |
3, 9, 17, 24 and 31 August 2016 |
9 |
Completed |
September 2016 |
6, 14, 21 and
28 September 2016 |
7 |
Completed |
October 2016 |
4, 12, 19 and
26 October 2016 |
7 |
Completed |
9.1.11
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 23 observations/
reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Contract 7
9.1.12
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract SS C505 to
evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-6 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-6 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 7
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
August 2016 |
5, 9, 16, 23 and 30 August 2016 |
4 |
Completed |
September 2016 |
6, 13, 20 and
27 September 2016 |
3 |
Completed |
October 2016 |
4, 11, 18 and
25 October 2016 |
2 |
Completed |
9.1.13
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 9
observations/ reminder were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Other
Contracts
9.1.14
Since the construction works at the Contract
4 are not yet commenced, no site inspection is performed
for these Contracts.
10.1.1 In the Reporting Period, no non-compliance, no summons and prosecution under the EM&A Programme was recorded and lodged for the Project. However, five (5) documented environmental complaints were received and the summary of complaint received in the Reporting Period is listed below.
25 August 2016
¡V A complaint was received from CEDD on 24 August 2016, regarding a great
amount of slurry was found in the stream besides Ping Yeung Village and also
flushed down from the upstream and was trapped by the nylon dam. Moreover, a
farm owner complained silt had choked at the U- channel in his farm since the
civil works commenced at the upstream. It was suspected that the slurry and
silt were leaked from the construction site under Contract No. CV/2013/08. The
complaint investigation was conducted on 23 August 2016. It was observed that
the slurry had flushed away and the nylon dam was loosed by the responsible
department. On the other hand, joint site inspection for the complaint
investigation was conducted by RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor of Contract 6
(CCKJV) on 25 August 2016. During the inspection, there was no slurry and
choked silt were observed in the nylon dam and the
U-channel respectively. Further, the silt associated with the complaint of the
U-channel was not likely to be related to the construction site due to the
ground level of the concerned farm and U-channel was higher than the
constructing area. In addition, it was investigated that the accumulated slurry
and mud were resulted by the continuous rainfall and severe runoff in the
stream near Ping Yeung Village, instead of resulted by the constructing area.
(Contract 6)
14
September 2016 ¡V A public complaint was received from 1823, regarding to the
slurry that was discovered on the vehicular road near the construction site of
CV/2013/08 in Nga Yiu Ha Village. It was suspected
that the slurry was associated with the untidiness of the exit construction
site at Bridge D. The joint site inspection for the complaint was conducted on
15 September 2016. It was known that the slurry was come out from the
construction site on account of the ground level of the concerned road was
slightly lower than the construction site. Also, the concerned vehicular road
was within the site boundary of Contract 6 but the road was allocated for
public use which crossing the construction site. In order to tackle the issue,
a worker and manual wheel washing were deployed to sweep the slurry to ensure
all vehicles have already washed before leaving the site. On the other hand,
the Contractor was suggested to fill up the concerned road to 150-200mm to
prevent the accumulation of slurry. (Contract 6)
20
September 2016 - A complaint was received from EPD, regarding to the clogged
storm drains along the roadside of Sha Tau Kok Road -
Ma Mei Ha. During the inspection on 29 September 2016, it was found that the
gully which located relatively far from the constructing area was partially
clogged with grit whereas the closer gully to the construction site was found
clear of mud and grit. In addition, it was observed that the gully located at
the roadside of Refuge Island in Tai Tong Wu was clogged with deciduous leaves
according to the photo provided by the complainant. After being investigated,
it was considered that the complaint was no related to the construction of the
project since the Contractors were not the only road users of Sha Tai Kok road. Also, there was no sign and evidence that could
prove the correlation between the clogged gullies and the constructing work. Despite,
to address the complainant¡¦s concern, Contractors agreed to alternately deploy
labor to clean up mud and grit accumulated in gullies along concerned section
of Sha Tau Kok Road. As advised by CCKJV, they will carry out
de-silting works of the gully in early October 2016. (Contracts 2 and 6)
20 October
2016 - A warning letter (ref.: EP560/G1/1(VII)) was issued from EPD to CCKJV on
25 October 2016 regarding a dump truck vehicle (vehicle registration mark: RX2229)
carrying dusty construction waste materials arisen under the subject account
travelling to the North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill on 20 October 2016
without proper cover. Joint
site inspection was carried out on 27 October 2016 for the complaint investigation.
It was observed that the concerned dump truck vehicle (vehicle registration
mark: RX2229) was spotted in the inspection and it was noted that the skip this
dump truck was well covered. The truck driver was inquired by CCKJV
after the warning letter was received. They were informed by the driver that
the dump skip had well covered before the driver left the site. However, the
driver unintentionally pressed the open button and triggered one side of the
mechanical cover when he was travelling to NENT Landfill. As additional
measures, CCKJV agreed to erect signage at the site exit to aware all vehicles
drivers to check the vehicles were washed and well covered before leaving the
construction. Moreover, surprise
check will be conducted regularly to ensure the dump trucks driver strictly
follow all the procedure when carrying dusty materials from the construction
site to the disposal locations. In response to the complaint, CCKJV has
arranged a specified training on topic of ¡§proper cover of dump trucks, wheel
washing and responsibility¡¨ to all sub-constructor representative of dump truck
on 2 November 2016. (Contract 6)
28 October 2016 ¡VA complaint was received
from 1823 on 28 October 2016 regarding to the muddy water discharged out of the
construction sites near the traffic light post at the junction of Sha Tau Kok Road and Wo Keng Shan
Road. The cumulated muddy water
splashed on the pedestrian when vehicles passing by the road which causing
inconvenience to the pedestrian and public. The investigating inspection was
conducted on 3 November 2016 at the suspected four (4) site exits along the Sha
Tau Kok Road and Wo Keng
Shan Road. The North Portal under Contract 2 was found clean as no trails of
mud and muddy water were observed. On the other hand, in proposed Sha Tau Kok interchange, Wo Keng Shan
Park and the South Portal site office under Contract 6, there was also no mud
and muddy water were observed on the adjacent Wo Keng
Shan Road. In our investigation, the site exits near the complaint location under
the project were satisfactory and muddy water discharge out of the construction
site to the public roads was unlikely to occur. It is considered that the
suspected muddy water discharge from the works area out to Sha Tau Kok Road and Wo Keng Shan Road
was unlikely due to the project. As advised by both contractors, road washing/
cleaning by water bowsers was provided along Wo Keng
Shan Road to Sha Tau Kok Road in every normal working
day (Mon-Sat), except for rainy day. Moreover, the ET will keep closely
inspection on the cleanliness situation during weekly site inspection.
(Contracts 2 and 6)
10.1.2
Upon receipt of the complaint, follow up action has been undertaken
by both Contractor promptly to resolve the complaints and deficiencies. Investigation for the complaint was
carried out by ET independently and the associated investigation reports were
submitted to relevant parties. In
the Reporting Period, two (2)
out of five
(5)
complaints was considered as project related and remedial action have been undertaken by the
relevant Contractor.
10.1.3
The statistical summary table of
environmental complaint, summons and prosecution are presented in Tables 10-1, 10-2
and 10-3.
Table 10-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
|||
Frequency
(Project related
complaint) |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
Project related
complaint |
||
2 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
22 |
(12)Water Quality (7) Dust (2) Noise (1) dust & noise |
(3) water (2) dust (1) noise |
Sep 2016 |
1 (0) |
||||
Oct 2016 |
1 (0) |
||||
3 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
4 |
(1) Dust (2) Water quality (1) Noise |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
||||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
||||
5 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
4 |
(3) Dust (1) Noise |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
||||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
||||
6 |
Aug 2016 |
1 |
26 |
(19) Water Quality (6) Dust (1) Noise |
(6) water (2) dust |
Sep 2016 |
2 (1) |
||||
Oct 2016 |
2 (1) |
||||
7 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
NA |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
||||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
||||
SS C505 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
2 |
(1) Dust (1) Noise |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
||||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
Table 10-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Summons Statistics |
||||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||||
Water |
Air |
Noise |
||||
2 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
5 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
6 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
7 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS C505 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 10-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Prosecution Statistics |
||||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||||
Water |
Air |
Noise |
||||
2 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
5 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
6 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
7 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS C505 |
Aug 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sep 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Oct 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10.1.4
Since the construction works at the Contract
4 is not yet commenced, no environmental complaint, summons and prosecution are
received in the Reporting Period accordingly.
11.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that
recommended in the Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation
Measures (ISEMM) in the approved EM&A Manual covered the issues of dust,
noise, water and waste and they are summarized presented in Appendix
I.
11.1.2
All contracts under the Project shall be
implementing the required environmental mitigation measures according to the approved
EM&A Manual as subject to the site condition. Environmental mitigation measures
generally implemented by Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and SS C505 in this Reporting
Period are summarized in Table 11-1.
Table 11-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Water Quality |
¡P Wastewater to be treated by
the filtration systems i.e. sedimentation tank or AquaSed before to discharge. |
Air Quality |
¡P Maintain damp / wet surface
on access road ¡P Keep slow speed in the sites ¡P All vehicles must use wheel
washing facility before off site ¡P Sprayed water during
breaking works ¡P A
cleaning truck was regularly performed on the public road to prevent fugitive dust emission |
Noise |
¡P Restrain operation time of
plants from 07:00 to 19:00 on any working day except for Public Holiday and
Sunday. ¡P Keep good maintenance of
plants ¡P Place noisy plants away from
residence or school ¡P Provide noise barriers or
hoarding to enclose the noisy plants or works ¡P Shut down the plants when
not in used. |
Waste and Chemical
Management |
¡P On-site sorting prior to
disposal ¡P Follow requirements and
procedures of the ¡§Trip-ticket System¡¨ ¡P Predict required quantity of
concrete accurately ¡P Collect
the unused fresh concrete at designated locations in the sites for subsequent
disposal |
General |
¡P The site was generally kept
tidy and clean. |
12.1.1 This is the
13th Quarterly EM&A Summary Report presenting the monitoring results
and inspection findings for the Reporting Period from 1 August
2016 to 31 October 2016.
12.1.2 For air
quality monitoring, no 1-hour monitoring results triggered the Action or Limit
Levels were recorded. However, two (2) Action Level exceedances
were recorded and investigation report revealed that the exceedances were not
project related.
12.1.3
In the Reporting Period, no construction noise exceedances were recorded and no complaints (which
triggered the Action Level exceedances) were
received which triggered the Action Level exceedances.
12.1.4
For water quality monitoring, a total of 100 Action Level (AL)/ Limit Level (LL) exceedances namely 43 AL/LL exceedances of turbidity and 57 LL exceedances of SS were recorded. The
investigation reports for cause of exceedances were conducted by ET and
submitted to relevant parties. In the Reporting Period, 4 out
of 100
exceedances were considered as project related and remedial action had
undertaken by the Contractor.
12.1.5 Ecology
monitoring for woodland compensation was conducted on 30 September 2016. The Monitoring Report for Woodland Compensation will be
prepared and submitted as a stand-alone report as supplementary for the
EM&A Report.
12.1.6 During the
Reporting Period, weekly joint site inspections for Contract 2, Contract 3, Contract
5, Contract 6, Contract 7 and Contract SS C505 were undertaken to evaluate the
site environmental performance. No non-compliances were observed during the weekly
site inspection and environmental audit of the Reporting Period, indicating the
implemented mitigation measures for air quality, construction noise and water
quality were effective. Minor
deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general rectified
within the specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
12.1.7 In this
Reporting Period, five (5) documented
environmental complaints were received for the Project. Upon
receipt of the complaint, follow up action has been undertaken
by both Contractor promptly to resolve the complaints and deficiencies. Investigation for the complaint was
carried out by ET independently and the associated investigation reports were
submitted to relevant parties. In
the Reporting Period, two (2) out of five (5) complaints were considered as
project related and remedial action had undertaken by the Contractor.
12.1.8 No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period.
12.2.1 During dry
season, special attention should be paid on the potential construction dust
impact since most of the construction sites are adjacent to villages. The
Contractor should fully implement the construction dust mitigation measures.
12.2.2 Preventive
measures for muddy water or other water pollutants from site surface flow to local
stream such as Kong Yiu Channel, Ma Wat Channel, Ping
Yuen River or public area should be properly maintained. The Contractors should paid special
attention on water quality mitigation measures and fully implement according
ISEMM of the EM&A Manual, in particular for working areas near Ma Wat
Channel and Ping Yuen River.
Moreover, all effluent discharge shall be ensure to fulfill Technical
Memorandum of Effluent Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, inland
and Coastal Waters criteria or discharge permits stipulation.
12.2.3 Construction
noise is also a key environmental
issue during construction of the Project. Noise mitigation measures should be
implemented in accordance with the EM&A requirement.