|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Job No.: TCS00694/13 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Agreement No. CE 45/2008
(CE) Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
and Associated Works |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
14th Quarterly Environmental Monitoring & Audit Summary Report ¡V (November
2016 to January 2017) |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared
For |
|
|
||
|
|
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) |
|
|
||
Quality Index |
|||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
6 June 2017 |
TCS00694/13/600/R0999v2 |
|
|
Nicola
Hon (Environmental Consultant) |
T.W. Tam (Environmental Team Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Description |
1 |
26 May 2017 |
First
Submission |
2 |
6 June 2017 |
Amended according to the IEC¡¦s comments on 2 June
2017 |
|
|
|
This
report has been prepared by Action-United Environmental Services &
Consulting with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of
the Agreement with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions
of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement
with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in
respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is
confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever
nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made
known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. |
Executive Summary
ES.01.
This is the 14th Quarterly EM&A
Summary Report for the ¡§Liantang/Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works¡¨ under Environmental Permit No. EP-404/2011/D (hereinafter ¡¥¡¥the EP¡¦¡¦), covering the period from 1 November 2016 to 31 January 2017 (hereinafter ¡§Reporting
Period¡¨).
Environmental Monitoring and
Audit Activities
ES.02. In the
Reporting Period, the construction works under Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai
Boundary Control Point and Associated Works of the Project
included Contract 2, Contract 3, Contract 6, Contract 7 and Contract SS C505. Environmental monitoring
activities under the EM&A programme in the Reporting Period are summarized
in the following table.
Environmental Aspect |
Monitoring
Parameters / Inspection |
Reporting Period |
|
Monitoring Locations
/ Contracts |
Total Occasions |
||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
9 |
432 |
24-hour TSP |
9 |
144 |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
10 |
130 |
Water Quality |
Water in-situ measurement and/or sampling |
WM1 & WM1-C, |
38 scheduled and 0 extra of sampling day |
WM2A & WM2A-Cx |
38 scheduled and 10 extra of sampling day |
||
WM2B & WM2B-C |
38 scheduled and 1 extra of sampling day |
||
WM3 &WM3-C |
38 scheduled and 8 extra of sampling day |
||
WM4, WM4-CA &WM4-CB |
38 scheduled and 3 extra of sampling day |
||
Ecology |
Woodland compensation i) General Health condition of planted species ii) Survival of planted species |
9 Quadrats |
2 |
Joint Site Inspection / Audit |
IEC, ET, the Contractor and RE joint site Environmental Inspection and Auditing |
Contract 2 |
13 |
Contract 3 |
12 |
||
Contract 6 |
13 |
||
Contract 7 |
13 |
||
Contract SS C505 |
13 |
Note: Extra monitoring day was due to
measurement results exceedance
Breaches
of Action/Limit levels
ES.03. In the
Reporting Period, no air quality exceedances
were recorded. However, one noise
complaint which triggered Action Level was registered for construction noise. For
water quality monitoring, a total of
55 of Action/ Limit Level exceedance
were recorded. The summary of exceedance
for the Reporting Period is shown below.
Environmental
Aspect |
Monitoring Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Event & Action |
||
NOE Issued |
Investigation |
Corrective Actions |
||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
24-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
1 |
0 |
0 |
IR revealed that the noise complaint was
non-project related |
-- |
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
Turbidity |
1 |
24 |
25 |
3 exceedances were Project related 22 exceedances were not Project
related |
The related Contractors shall implemented water quality mitigation measures in
accordance with ISEMM of the EM&A Manual requirements |
|
SS |
2 |
28 |
30 |
3 exceedances were Project related 27 exceedances were not Project
related |
Environmental
Complaint
ES.04. In this Reporting Period, seven (7)
documented environmental
complaints were received under the EM&A Programme.
Investigation result
revealed that 2 complaints regards
wastewater issues were related to the works under Project and remedial actions
had undertaken by Contractor. The
rest of 5 complaints were not related to works under Project.
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
ES.05. No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period.
Reporting Changes
ES.06. In the
Reporting period, no reporting changes were made.
Future key issues
ES.07. During dry
season, special attention should be paid on the potential construction dust
impact since most of the construction sites are adjacent to villages. The
Contractor should fully implement the construction dust mitigation measures.
ES.08. Preventive
measures for muddy water or other water pollutants from site surface flow to local
stream such as Kong Yiu Channel, Ma Wat Channel, Ping
Yuen River or public area should be properly maintained. The Contractors should paid special
attention on water quality mitigation measures and fully implement according
ISEMM of the EM&A Manual, in particular for working areas near Ma Wat
Channel and Ping Yuen River.
Moreover, all effluent discharge shall be ensure to fulfill Technical
Memorandum of Effluent Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, inland
and Coastal Waters criteria or discharge permits stipulation.
ES.09. Construction
noise would be a key environmental issue during construction work of the
Project. Noise mitigation measures
such as using quiet plants should be implemented in accordance with the
EM&A requirement.
Table of Contents
2 Project Organization and
Construction progress
2.1 Construction
Contract Packaging
2.5 Summary of Environmental Submissions
3 Project Organization and
Construction progress
3.4 Monitoring
Frequency and Period
3.8 Derivation
of Action/Limit (A/L) Levels
3.9 Data
Management and Data QA/QC Control
4.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
5 Construction Noise
Monitoring
5.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
5.3 Noise
Monitoring Results (Restricted Hours)
6.2 Summary
of Monitoring Results
8.2 Records
of Waste Quantities
10 Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Prosecutions
10.1 Status
of Non-compliance Environmental Complaint, Summons and Prosecution
11 Implementation Status of Mitigation
Measures
12 Conclusions and Recommendations
List
of tables
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Table 3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Table 3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-8 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Table 3-10 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Table 4-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Air Quality A/L Levels
Table 5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Table 5-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Construction Noise A/L Levels
Table 5-3 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results for Restricted Hours
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 5
Table 6-2 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 3
Table 6-3 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 6
Table 6-4 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 6
Table 6-5 Summaries
of Breaches of the Existing Water Quality A/L Levels
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Table 8-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 8-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 9-1 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 2
Table 9-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 3
Table 9-3 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 5
Table 9-4 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 6
Table 9-5 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract SS C505
Table 9-6 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 7
Table 10-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 10-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 10-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Table 11-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List of Annexes
Appendix A Layout plan of the Project
Appendix B Environmental Management Organization Chart
Appendix C Designated Monitoring Locations as Recommended in the Approved
EM&A Manual
Appendix D Monitoring Locations for Impact Monitoring
Appendix E Event and Action Plan
Appendix F Graphical Plots for Monitoring
Result
Appendix G Weather information
Appendix H Waste Flow Table
Appendix I Implementation Schedule for Environmental
Mitigation Measures
1.1.1. Civil Engineering and
Development Department is the Project
Proponent and the Permit Holder of Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary
Control Point and Associated Works, which is a Designated Project to be
implemented under Environmental Permit number EP-404/2011/C granted on 12 March
2015 and the latest Environmental Permit
number EP-404/2011/D granted on 20 January 2017.
1.1.2. The Project consists of two main
components: Construction of a Boundary Control Point (hereinafter referred as
¡§BCP¡¨); and Construction of a connecting road alignment. Layout plan of the Project is shown in Appendix A.
1.1.3. The proposed BCP is located at the
boundary with Shenzhen near the existing Chuk Yuen
Village, comprising a main passenger building with passenger and cargo processing
facilities and the associated customs, transport and ancillary facilities. The connecting road alignment consists
of six main sections:
1)
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area (FCA) Boundary ¡V this section
comprises at-grade and viaducts and includes the improvement works at Lin Ma
Hang Road;
2)
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan ¡V this section
stretches from the Frontier Closed Area Boundary to the tunnel portal at Cheung
Shan and comprises at-grade and viaducts including an interchange at Ping
Yeung;
3)
North Tunnel ¡V this section comprises the tunnel segment at Cheung Shan
and includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel;
4)
Sha Tau Kok Road ¡V this section stretches from
the tunnel portal at Wo Keng Shan to the tunnel
portal south of Loi Tung and comprises at-grade and
viaducts including an interchange at Sha Tau Kok and
an administration building;
5)
South Tunnel ¡V this section comprises a tunnel segment that stretches from
Loi Tung to Fanling and
includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel as
well as a ventilation building in the middle of the tunnel near Lau Shui Heung;
6)
Fanling ¡V this section comprises the at-grade, viaducts and interchange
connection to the existing Fanling Highway.
1.1.4.
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting has been commissioned as an Independent ET to implement the
relevant EM&A program in accordance
with the approved EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties.
1.1.5.
This is the 14th Quarterly
EM&A Summary Report presenting the monitoring
results and inspection findings for the Reporting Period from 1 November 2016 to 31 January 2017.
1.2.1
The Quarterly Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) Summary Report is structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Project Organization and
Construction progress
Section 3 Summary of Impact monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air Quality Monitoring
Section 5 Construction Noise
Monitoring
Section 6 Water Quality Monitoring
Section 7 Ecology Monitoring
Section 8 Waste Management
Section 9 Site Inspection
Section 10 Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Prosecutions
Section 11 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 12 Conclusions and Recommendations
2.1.1
To facilitate the project management and
implementation, the Project would be divided by the following contracts:
¡P
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
¡P
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
¡P
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
¡P
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
¡P
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
¡P
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
¡P
ArchSD Contract No. SS C505
2.1.2
The
details of each contracts is summarized below and the delineation of each contracts is shown in Appendix A.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.1.3
Contract 2 has awarded in December 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 19 May 2014. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 2 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
an approximately 5.2km long dual two-lane connecting road (with about 0.4km of
at-grade road and 4.8km of tunnel) connecting the Fanling Interchange with the
proposed Sha Tau Kok Interchange;
¡P
construction of a
ventilation adit tunnel and the mid-ventilation
building;
¡P
construction of
the north and south portal buildings of the Lung Shan Tunnel and their
associated slope works;
¡P
provision and
installation of ventilation system, E&M works and building services works
for Lung Shan tunnel and Cheung Shan tunnel and their portal buildings;
¡P
construction of
Tunnel Administration Building adjacent to Wo Keng
Shan Road and the associated E&M and building services works; and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.1.4
Contract 3 was awarded in July 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 5 November 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 3 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
four link roads connecting the existing Fanling Highway and the south portal of
the Lung Shan Tunnel;
¡P
realignment of
the existing Tai Wo Service Road West and Tai Wo Service Road East;
¡P
widening of the
existing Fanling Highway (HyD¡¦s
entrustment works);
¡P
demolishing
existing Kiu Tau vehicular bridge and Kiu Tau footbridge and reconstruction of the existing Kiu Tau Footbridge (HyD¡¦s
entrustment works); and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.1.5
Contract
4 has awarded in mid-April 2016. However, the major construction work still is not
yet commenced. The scope of work
of the Contract 4 includes:
¡P
design,
supply, delivery, installation, testing and commissioning of a traffic control
and surveillance system for the connecting road linking up the Liantang / Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and the existing Fanling Highway.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.1.6
Contract 5 has awarded in April 2013 and
construction work was commenced in August 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 5 is
listed below:
¡P
site formation of about 23
hectares of land for the development of the BCP;
¡P
construction of an
approximately 1.6 km long perimeter road at the BCP including a 175m long
depressed road;
¡P
associated
diversion/modification works at existing local roads and junctions including
Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
construction of pedestrian
subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
provision of resite area with supporting infrastructure for reprovisioning of the affected village houses; and
¡P
construction of associated footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage,
sewerage, waterworks, landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.1.7
Contract 6 was awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 6 would
be included below:
construction of an approximately 4.6km long dual two-lane connecting
road (with about 0.6km of at-grade road, 3.3km of viaduct and 0.7km of tunnel)
connecting the BCP with the proposed Sha Tau Kok Road
Interchange and the associated ventilation buildings;
associated diversion/modification works at access roads to the resite of Chuk Yuen Village;
provision of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities for
the BCP and the resite of Chuk
Yuen Village;
construction of a pedestrian subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang
Road;
provisioning of the affected facilities including Wo Keng Shan Road garden; and
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.1.8
Contract 7 was awarded in December 2015 and
the construction work was commenced 15 February 2016. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 7 would
be included below:
construction of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) portion of four vehicular bridge
construction of one
pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen (SZ) River (cross boundary bridges)
ArchSD Contract No. SS
C505
2.1.9
SS C505 has been awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. Major Scope of Work of the SS C505 would
be included below:
passenger-related facilities including
processing kiosks and examination facilities for private cars and coaches,
passenger clearance building and halls, the interior fitting works for the
pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen River, etc.;
cargo processing facilities including kiosks
for clearance of goods vehicles, customs inspection platforms, X-ray building,
etc.;
accommodation for the facilities inside of the
Government departments providing services in connection with the BCP;
transport-related facilities inside the BCP
including road networks, public transport interchange, transport drop-off and
pick-up areas, vehicle holding areas and associated road furniture etc;
a public carpark; and
other ancillary
facilities such as sewerage and drainage, building services provisions and
electronic systems, associated environmental mitigation measure and landscape
works.
2.2.1
The project organization is shown in Appendix B. The responsibilities of respective parties are:
Civil
Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)
2.2.2
CEDD is the Project Proponent and the Permit Holder of the EP of the development
of the Project and will assume overall responsibility for the project. An
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) shall be employed by CEDD to audit the
results of the EM&A works carried out by the ET.
Architectural
Services Department (ArchSD)
2.2.3
ArchSD acts as
the works agent for Development Bureau (DEVB), for Contract SS C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point (BCP) ¡V BCP
Buildings and Associated Facilities.
Environmental
Protection Department (EPD)
2.2.4
EPD is the statutory enforcement body for
environmental protection matters in Hong Kong.
Ronald Lu
& Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd (The Architect)
2.2.5
Ronald Lu & Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd is
appointed by ArchSD as an Architect for Contract SS
C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
(BCP) ¡V BCP Buildings and Associated Facilities. It responsible for overseeing the
construction works of Contract SS C505 and for ensuring that the works are
undertaken by the Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract
requirements. The duties and responsibilities of the Architect with respect to
EM&A are:
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the
environmental mitigation measures and their effectiveness
Monitor Contractors¡¦ and ET¡¦s compliance with
the requirements in the Environmental Permit (EP) and EM&A Manual
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the EM&A
programme
Participate in joint site inspection by the ET
and IEC
Oversee the implementation of the agreed Event
/ Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project discussing regarding the
cumulative impact issues.
Engineer
or Engineers Representative (ER)
2.2.6
The ER is responsible for overseeing the
construction works and for ensuring that the works are undertaken by the
Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract requirements. The
duties and responsibilities of the ER with respect to EM&A are:
¡P
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the environmental
mitigation measures and their effectiveness
¡P
Monitor Contractors¡¦s,
ET¡¦s and IEC¡¦s compliance with the requirements in the Environmental Permit
(EP) and EM&A Manual
¡P
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the
EM&A programme
¡P
Participate in joint site inspection by the
ET and IEC
¡P
Oversee the implementation of the agreed
Event / Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s Regulaiton of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project
discussing regarding the cumulative impact issues.
The
Contractor(s)
2.2.7
There will be one contractor for each
individual works contract. The Contractor(s)
should report to the ER. The duties
and responsibilities of the Contractor are:
¡P
Comply with the relevant contract conditions
and specifications on environmental protection
¡P
Employ an Environmental Team (ET) to
undertake monitoring, laboratory analysis and reporting of EM &A Facilitate
ET¡¦s monitoring and site inspection activities
¡P
Participate in the site inspections by the ET
and IEC, and undertake any corrective actions
¡P
Provide information / advice to the ET
regarding works programme and activities which may contribute to the generation
of adverse environmental impacts
¡P
Submit proposals on mitigation measures in
case of exceedances of Action and Limit levels in accordance with the Event /
Action Plans
¡P
Implement measures to reduce impact where
Action and Limit levels are exceeded
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Environmental Team (ET)
2.2.8
One ET will be employed for this Project. The ET shall not be in any way an
associated body of the Contractor(s), and shall be employed by the Project
Proponent/Contractor to conduct the EM&A programme. The ET should be managed by the ET
Leader. The ET Leader shall be a person who has at least 7 years¡¦ experience in
EM&A and has relevant professional qualifications. Suitably qualified staff
should be included in the ET, and resources for the implementation of the
EM&A programme should be allocated in time under the Contract(s), to enable
fulfillment of the Project¡¦s EM&A requirements as specified in the EM&A
Manual during construction of the Project. The ET shall report to the Project
Proponent and the duties shall include:
¡P
Monitor and audit various environmental
parameters as required in this EM&A Manual
¡P
Analyse the
environmental monitoring and audit data, review the success of EM&A
programme and the adequacy of mitigation measures implemented, confirm the
validity of the EIA predictions and identify any adverse environmental impacts
arising
¡P
Carry out regular site inspection to
investigate and audit the Contractors¡¦ site practice, equipment/plant and work
methodologies with respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation,
and effect proactive action to pre-empt problems
¡P
Monitor compliance with conditions in the EP,
environmental protection, pollution prevention and control regulations and
contract specifications
¡P
Audit environmental conditions on site
¡P
Report on the environmental monitoring and
audit results to EPD, the ER, the lEC and Contractor(s) or their delegated representatives
¡P
Recommend suitable mitigation measures to the
Contractor in the case of exceedance of Action and Limit levels in accordance
with the Event and Action Plans
¡P
Liaise with the IEC on all environmental
performance matters and timely submit all relevant EM&A proforma
for approval by IEC
¡P
Advise the Contractor(s) on environmental
improvement, awareness, enhancement measures etc., on site
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, ET, lEC and the
Contractor(s) of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
2.2.9
One IEC will be employed for this Project. The Independent Environmental Checker
(IEC) should not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor(s) or the
ET for the Project. The IEC should
be employed by the Permit Holder (i.e., CEDD) prior to
the commencement of the construction of the Project. The IEC should have at least 10 years¡¦ experience
in EM&A and have relevant professional qualifications. The duty of IEC should be:
¡P
Provide proactive advice to the ER and the
Project Proponent on EM&A matters related to the project, independent from
the management of construction works, but empowered to audit the environmental
performance of construction
¡P
Review and audit all aspects of the EM&A
programme implemented by the ET
¡P
Review and verify the monitoring data and all
submissions in connection with the EP and EM&A Manual submitted by the ET
¡P
Arrange and conduct regular, at least monthly
site inspections of the works during construction phase, and ad hoc inspections
if significant environmental problems are identified
¡P
Check compliance with the agreed Event /
Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Check compliance with the procedures for
carrying out complaint investigation
¡P
Check the effectiveness of corrective
measures
¡P
Feedback audit results to ET by signing off
relevant EM&A proforma
¡P
Check that the mitigation measures are
effectively implemented
¡P
Report the works conducted, the findings,
recommendation and improvement of the site inspections, after reviewing ET¡¦s
and Contractor¡¦s works, and advices to the ER and Project Proponent on a
monthly basis
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, ET, lEC and the
Contractor(s) of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
2.3.1
The concurrent construction works that may be
carried out include, but not limited to, the following:
(a)
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage IV;
(b)
Widening of Fanling Highway ¡V Tai Hang to Wo Hop Shek Interchange ¡V Contract
No. HY/2012/06;
(c)
Construction of BCP facilities in Shenzhen.
2.4.1
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction activity conducted under the Project is located in Contracts 2, 3,
6, 7 and SS C505 and they are summarized in below.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.4.2
Construction work of Contract 2 was commenced
on 19 May 2014, the following activities were
conducted in the Reporting Period.
Mid-Vent Portal |
Stud tunnel and cavern
excavation Adit invert slab,
waterproofing and lining Connecting
structure, ventilation building superstructure and backfilling Preparation for Tunnel Boring Machine
(TBM) south drive break out |
North Portal |
Slope stabilization and
retaining wall Southbound Tunnel Boring
Machine (TBM) excavation Northbound bench
excavation Tunnel enlargement and
construction of cross passage Tunnel internal
structure and cross passage ventilation building
foundation |
South Portal |
Southbound and northbound Drill & Blast Excavation
South ventilation and building superstructure
Tunnel invert, waterproofing and lining |
Admin Building |
Building superstructure
and external wall |
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.4.3
Contract commenced in November 2013, the
following activities were conducted in the Reporting Period.
Abutment
construction
Construction
of boundary wall for DSD pumping station
Cable
detection and trial trenches
Demolition
of existing Vehicular Bridge
Footbridge
construction
Storm
drains laying
Noise
barrier construction
Pier /
pier table construction
Pile
cap works
Portal
beam construction
Retaining
wall construction
Road
works
Sewer
works
Utilities
Duct Laying
Viaduct
segment erection
Water
Main Laying
Extended
Podium construction
Construction
of remaining base Slab of Box Culvert ID4
Slope
reinstatement works near Bridge E
Utilities
duct laying
Viaduct
segment erection
Demolition
of existing WSD Telemetry House
Roundabout
modification works
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.4.4
The
Contract was awarded in mid-April 2016 and the major construction work has not yet
commenced.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.4.5
As advised by the ER, the construction works
under Contract 5 was substantially completed on 31 August 2016.
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.4.6
Contract 6 has awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. In this Reporting Period,
construction activities conducted are listed below:
Bored
Piling
Pile Cap
Construction
Bridge
Pier Construction
Bridge
Segment Erection
Tunnel Excavation
Sewage
Treatment Plant Construction
Road
Construction
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.4.7
Contract 7 has awarded in December 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 15 February 2015. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
•
Piling Works at Bridges A
and E
•
Pile Caps Construction at
Bridges A, B, D and E
•
Column construction at
Bridge C
•
2nd
floor slab construction at Bridge C
Contract SS C505
2.4.8
Contract SS C505 has awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
•
General Site Set-up
•
Building no.4, 5, 6, 7,
9, 10, 11 and 36 construction
•
Excavation waterproofing
works for Building no. 4, 6 & 11
•
Excavation for drainage
works for Building no. 4 & 5
•
Pile cap construction for
Building no. 4, 6 & 7
•
Roof construction for
Building no.36
•
Tower crane operation
•
Bridge construction works
including construction of bridge column, retaining wall, pile cap and pier
•
Underground drainage
works
•
Prototype ¡§A¡¨ & ¡§B¡¨
construction works
•
Mock up for south
entrance double curve cladding
•
Formwork and falsework
for PTB¡¦s slab construction
•
Construction PTB M/F
& 1/F flat slab
•
Steel beam works for
maintenance platform for PTB
•
Pile cap construction for
PTB, including excavation and backfilling works
•
Bridge deck construction
for Bridges 1 ¡V 5
•
Footing construction
2.5.1
In according to the EP, the required
documents have submitted to EPD for retention which listed in below:
Project
Layout Plans of Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and SS C505
Landscape
Plan
Topsoil
Management Plan
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Programme
Baseline
Monitoring Report (TCS00690/13/600/R0030v3) for the Project
Waste
Management Plan of the Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and SS C505
Contamination
Assessment Plan (CAP) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi Tung and
the workshops in Fanling
Contamination
Assessment Report (CAR) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi Tung and
the workshops in Fanling
Vegetation
Survey Report
Woodland
Compensation Plan
Habitat
Creation Management Plan
Wetland
Compensation Plan
2.5.2
Summary of
the relevant permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for the Project of each contracts are presented in Table 2-1.
Table
2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Item |
Description |
License/Permit
Status |
|||||
Ref.
no. |
Effective Date |
Expiry Date |
|||||
Contract 2 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref No.: 368864 |
31 Dec 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
|||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
North Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-652-D2523-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
|||
Mid-Vent Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2524-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
|||||
South Portal Waste Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2526-01 |
9 Apr 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
|||||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.WT00018374-2014 |
8 Oct 2014 |
30 Sep 2019 |
|||
No.: W5/1I389 |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
|||||
No. WT00023063-2015 |
18 Dec 2015 |
31 Mar 2019 |
|||||
No.: W5/1I392 |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
|||||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7019105 |
8 Jan 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
|||
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0457-16 |
22 Jun 2016 |
14 Dec 2016 |
|||
GW-RN0435-16 |
27 Jun 2016 |
26 Dec 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0543-16 |
18 Jul 2016 |
13 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0582-16 |
09 Aug 2016 |
08 Nov 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0590-16 |
09 Aug 2016 |
08 Nov 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0579-16 |
11 Aug 2016 |
07 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0604-16 |
11 Aug 2016 |
07 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0695-16 |
18 Sep 2016 |
17 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0700-16 |
20 Sep 2016 |
19 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0759-16 |
12 Oct 2016 |
11 Apr 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0780-16 |
27 Oct 2016 |
26 Dec 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0788-16 |
27 Oct 2016 |
26 Dec 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0800-16 |
01 Nov 2016 |
29 Apr 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0814-16 |
06 Nov 2016 |
27 Nov 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0822-16 |
09 Nov 2016 |
08 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0823-16 |
09 Nov 2016 |
08 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0839-16 |
20 Nov 2016 |
07 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0852-16 |
23 Nov 2016 |
2 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0895-16 |
20 Dec 2016 |
11 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0926-16 |
27 Dec 2016 |
26 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0928-16 |
27 Dec 2016 |
26 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0072-17 |
1 Feb
2017 |
31 Jul
2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0073-17 |
1 Feb
2017 |
31 Jul
2017 |
|||||
6 |
Specified
Process License (Mortar
Plant Operation) |
L-3-251(1) |
12-Apr-2016 |
11-Apr-2021 |
|||
Contract 3 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 362101 |
17 Jul 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
|||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number: No.:5113-634-C3817-01 |
7 Oct 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
|||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.:WT00016832 ¡V 2013 |
28 Aug 13 |
31 Aug 2018 |
|||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017914 |
2 Aug 13 |
Till Contract ends |
|||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0414-16 |
18 Jun 2016 |
17 Dec 2016 |
|||
GW-RN0434-16 |
22 Jun 2016 |
21 Dec 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0525-16 |
20 Jul 2016 |
7 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0541-16 |
5 Aug 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
|||||
GW-RN0549-16 |
30 Jul 2016 |
9 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0561-16 |
16 Aug 2016 |
11 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0580-16 |
25 Aug 2016 |
24 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0581-16 |
25 Aug 2016 |
24 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0596-16 |
17 Aug 2016 |
15 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0619-16 |
22 Aug 2016 |
14 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0646-16 |
10 Sep 2016 |
9 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0649-16 |
3 Sep 2016 |
7 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0653-16 |
11 Sep 2016 |
10 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0654-16 |
15 Sep 2016 |
14 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0708-16 |
8 Oct 2016 |
28 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0711-16 |
1 Oct 2016 |
13 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0720-16 |
4 Oct 2016 |
31 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0729-16 |
5 Oct 2016 |
31 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0756-16 |
18 Oct 2016 |
13 Apr 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0759-16 |
5 Nov 2016 |
29 Apr 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0816-16 |
13 Nov2016 |
27 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0833-16 |
13 Nov2016 |
10 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0836-16 |
15 Nov2016 |
31 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0843-16 |
18 Nov2016 |
17 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0856-16 |
17 Nov2016 |
7 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0870-16 |
30 Nov2016 |
13 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0871-16 |
29 Nov2016 |
20 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0872-16 |
29 Nov2016 |
20 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0901-16 |
11 Dec 2016 |
4 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0939-16 |
22 Dec 2016 |
21 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0947-16 |
24 Dec 2016 |
15 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0965-16 |
28 Dec 2016 |
13 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0002-17 |
8 Jan 2017 |
4 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0004-17 |
11 Jan 2017 |
18 Feb 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0021-17 |
19 Jan 2017 |
8 Jul 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0029-17 |
21 Jan 2017 |
8 Jul 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0032-17 |
25 Feb 2017 |
10 Jul 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0040-17 |
25 Jan 2017 |
24 Aug 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0048-17 |
3 Feb 2017 |
16 Jun 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0066-17 |
15 Feb 2017 |
15 Jul 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0069-17 |
15 Feb 2017 |
14 Aug 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0070-17 |
3 Feb 2017 |
15 Jul 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0071-17 |
16 Feb 2017 |
15 Aug 2017 |
|||||
Contract 5 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 359338 |
13 May 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-642-S3735-01 |
8 Jun 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: W5/1G44/1 |
8 Jun 13 |
30 Jun 2018 |
|||
4 |
Waste Disposal
Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017351 |
29 Apr 13 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
Contract 6 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390614 |
29 Jun 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-652-C3969-01 |
31 Aug 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
3 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022707 |
9 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
4 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.:WT00024574-2016 |
31 May 2016 |
31 May 2021 |
|||
No.:WT00024576-2016 |
31 May 2016 |
31 May 2021 |
|||||
No.:WT00024742-2016 |
14
June 2016 |
30
June 2021 |
|||||
No.:WT00024746-2016 |
14
June 2016 |
30
June 2021 |
|||||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0588-16 |
19 Oct 2016 |
18 Apr 2017 |
|||
GW-RN0766-16 |
21 Oct 2016 |
20 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0915-16 |
20 Dec 2016 |
14 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0937-16 |
3 Jan 2017 |
31 Mar 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0964-16 |
6 Jan 2017 |
5 Apr 2017 |
|||||
GW-RW0003-17 |
16 Jan 20217 |
15 Jul 2017 |
|||||
GW-RW0005-17 |
1 Apr 2017 |
30 Jun 2017 |
|||||
Contract SS C505 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390974 |
13 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5213-642-L1048-07 |
16 Sep 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: WT00024865-2016 |
8 Jul 2016 |
30 Nov 2020 |
|||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022831 |
23 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0396-16 |
5 June 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
|||
GW-RN0806-16 |
5 Nov 2016 |
4 May 2017 |
|||||
PP-RN0020-16 |
16 Jul 2016 |
14 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0520-16 |
23 Jul 2016 |
22 Jan 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0803-16 |
5 Nov 2016 |
4 May 2017 |
|||||
GW-RN0065-17 |
7 Feb 2017 |
6 Aug 2017 |
|||||
Contract
7 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 397015 |
21 Dec 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5214-641-K3202-01 |
24 Mar 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
No.: WT00024422-2016 |
10 May 2016 |
31 May 2021 |
|||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7024129 |
21 Jan 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
|||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0538-16 |
23 Jul 2016 |
4 Nov 2016 |
|||
GW-RN0799-16 |
5 Nov 2016 |
4 May 2017 |
|||||
Contract 4 |
|||||||
1 |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Form of
Notification of Construction work has submitted to EPD in July 2016. |
|||||
2 |
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
Application is under
preparation |
|||||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge
License |
Application is under
preparation |
|||||
4 |
Waste
Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Application is under
preparation |
|||||
3.1.1
The Environmental Monitoring and Audit
requirements are set out in the Approved EM&A manual. Environmental issues
such as air quality, construction noise and water quality were identified as
the key issues during the construction phase of the Project.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the
sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The EM&A program of construction phase
monitoring shall cover the following environmental issues:
•
Air quality;
•
Construction noise; and
•
Water quality
3.2.2
A summary of the monitoring parameters is
presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Environmental
Issue |
Parameters |
Air
Quality |
1-hour
TSP by Real-Time Portable Dust Meter; and 24-hour
TSP by High Volume Air Sampler. |
Noise |
Leq(30min) in normal working days (Monday to
Saturday) 07:00-19:00 except public holiday; and 3 sets
of consecutive Leq(5min) on
restricted hours i.e. 19:00 to 07:00 next day, and whole day of public
holiday or Sunday Supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and
L90 shall also be obtained for reference. |
Water
Quality |
In-situ
Measurements Dissolved
Oxygen Concentration (mg/L); Dissolved
Oxygen Saturation (% ); Turbidity
(NTU); pH unit; Water
depth (m); and Temperature
(¢J). |
Laboratory Analysis Suspended
Solids (mg/L) |
3.3.1
The designated monitoring locations as
recommended in the EM&A Manual
are shown in Appendix C.
As the access to some of the designated monitoring locations was
questionable due to safety reason or denied by the landlords, alternative
locations therefore have had proposed. The proposed alternative monitoring
locations has updated in the revised EM&A Programme which verified by IEC
and certified by ET Leader prior submitted to EPD on 10 July 2013. Table 3-2, Table 3-3 and Table
3-4 are respectively listed the air quality, construction noise and
water quality monitoring locations for the Project and a map showing these
monitoring stations is presented in Appendix D.
Table
3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
AM1b^ |
Open area at Tsung
Yuen Ha Village |
BCP |
SS C505 Contract 5 Contract 7 |
AM2 |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang
Road |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
AM3 |
Ta Kwu
Ling Fire Service Station of Ta Kwu Ling Village. |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
AM4b^ |
House no. 10B1 Nga Yiu Ha
Village |
LMH to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 6 |
AM5a^ |
Ping Yeung Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM6 |
Wo Keng
Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM7b@ |
Loi Tung Village House |
Sha Tau Kok
Road |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
AM8 |
Po Kat Tsai Village No. 4 |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
AM9b# |
Nam Wa
Po Village House No. 80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM9a to AM9b was submitted to EPD on 4 Nov 2013 after
verified by the IEC and it was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (15) in EP
2/N7/A/52 Pt.10 dated 8 Nov 2013).
@ Proposal for the change of air quality
monitoring location from AM7a to AM7b was submitted to EPD on 4 June 2014 after
verified by the IEC. It was approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (7) in EP 2/N7/A/52
Pt.12 dated 9 Jun 2014).
^ Proposal for change of air quality monitoring
locations was enclosed in the updated EM&A Programme which approval by EPD
on 29 Mar 2016.
Table
3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
NM1 |
Tsung Yuen Ha Village House
No. 63 |
BCP |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 Contract 7 |
NM2a# |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang Road |
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area |
Contract 5, Contract 6 |
NM3 |
Ping Yeung Village House (facade facing northeast) |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM4 |
Wo Keng Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM5 |
Village House, Loi Tung |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM6 |
Tai Tong Wu Village House 2 |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM7 |
Po Kat Tsai Village |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
NM8 |
Village House, Tong Hang |
Fanling |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
NM9 |
Village House, Kiu Tau
Village |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
NM10 |
Nam Wa Po Village House No.
80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of construction
noise monitoring location from NM2 to NM2a was verified by the IEC on 6 May
2016 and was effective on 9 May 2016.
Table
3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Coordinates of Designated / Alternative Location |
Nature of the location |
Related to the Work Contract |
|
WM1 |
Downstream of Kong Yiu Channel |
833 679 |
845 421 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 51m of the designated location |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
WM1- Control |
Upstream of Kong Yiu Channel |
834 185 |
845 917 |
NA |
ArchSD SS C505 Contract 5 |
WM2A |
Downstream of River
Ganges |
834 204 |
844 471 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 81m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2A(a)* |
Downstream of River Ganges |
834 191 |
844 474 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 70m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2A- Controlx# |
Upstream of River
Ganges |
835 377 |
844 188 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 160m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2B |
Downstream of River
Ganges |
835 433 |
843 397 |
NA |
Contract 6 |
WM2B- Control |
Upstream of River
Ganges |
835 835 |
843 351 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 31m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM3x# |
Downstream of River
Indus |
836 206 |
842 270 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 180m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
WM3- Control |
Upstream of River
Indus |
836 763 |
842 400 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 26m of the designated location |
Contract 2# Contract 6 |
WM4 |
Downstream of Ma Wat
Channel |
833 850 |
838 338 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 11m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control A |
Kau Lung Hang Stream |
834 028 |
837 695 |
Alternative location
located at downstream 28m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control B |
Upstream of Ma Wat
Channel |
833760 |
837395 |
Alternative location
located at upstream 15m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
# EPD has approved the
revised EM&A Programme on 29th March 2016. If the measured water depth of the monitoring
station is lower than 150 mm, alternative location (WM3x and WM2A-Controlx)
based on the criteria were selected to perform water monitoring in accordance
with the updated EM&A Programme (Rev.05) (Section 4.1.4)
* Proposal for the change of water monitoring
location from WM2A to WM2A(a) was verified by the IEC and
it was approved by EPD. (EPD¡¦s ref. (10) in EP 2/N7/A/52 Pt.19)
3.4.1
The requirements of
impact monitoring are stipulated in Sections
2.1.6, 3.1.5 and 4.1.6 of the
approved EM&A Manual and
presented as follows.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.4.2
Frequency of impact
air quality monitoring is as follows:
1-hour TSP |
3 times every six
days during course of works |
24-hour TSP |
Once every 6 days during course of works. |
Noise Monitoring
3.4.3
One set of Leq(30min)
as 6 consecutive Leq(5min)
between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays and once every week during course of works. If construction work necessary to carry
out at other time periods, i.e. restricted time period (19:00 to 07:00 the next
morning and whole day on public holidays) (hereinafter referred as ¡§the
restricted hours¡¨), 3 consecutive Leq(5min) measurement will depended CNP requirements to
undertake. Supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results such as
L10 and L90 shall also be obtained for reference.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.4.4
The water quality monitoring frequency shall
be 3 days per week during course of works.
The interval between two sets of monitoring shall not be less than 36
hours.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.5.1
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. If the ET proposes to use a direct
reading dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP levels, it shall submit sufficient
information to the IEC to approve.
3.5.2
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement shall be determined by HOKLAS
accredited laboratory.
3.5.3
All equipment to be used for air quality
monitoring is listed in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-Hour
TSP |
|
High
Volume Air Sampler |
TISCH
High Volume Air Sampler, HVS Model TE-5170 |
Calibration
Kit |
TISCH
Model TE-5025A |
1-Hour TSP |
|
Portable Dust Meter |
Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass
Profiler & Counter |
Wind Data
Monitoring Equipment
3.5.4
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
wind data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging
wind speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location shall
be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
1)
The wind sensors should be installed 10 m
above ground so that they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by
buildings.
2)
The wind data should be captured by a data
logger. The data shall be downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
3)
The wind data monitoring equipment should be
re-calibrated at least once every six months.
4)
Wind direction should be divided into 16
sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
3.5.5
ET has liaised with the landlords of the
successful granted HVS installation premises. However, the owners rejected to provide
premises for wind data monitoring equipment installation.
3.5.6
Under this situation, the ET proposed
alternative methods to obtain representative wind data. Meteorological information as extracted
from ¡§the Hong Kong Observatory Ta Kwu Ling Station¡¨
is alternative method to obtain representative wind data. For Ta Kwu
Ling Station, it is located nearby the Project site. Moreover, this station is located at 15m
above mean sea level while its anemometer is located at 13m above the existing
ground which in compliance with the general setting up requirement. Furthermore, this station also can be to
provide the humidity, rainfall, and air pressure and temperature etc.
meteorological information. In Hong
Kong of a lot development projects, weather information extracted from Hong
Kong Observatory is common alternative method if weather station installation
not allowed.
Noise Monitoring
3.5.7
Sound
level meter in compliance with the International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1)
specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise monitoring. The sound level meter shall be checked
using an acoustic calibrator. The
wind speed shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring
the wind speed in m s-1.
3.5.8
Noise monitoring equipment to be used for
monitoring is listed in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
B&K
Type 2238 or Rion NL-52 |
Calibrator |
B&K
Type 4231 or Rion NC-74 |
Portable Wind Speed Indicator |
Testo Anemometer |
3.5.9
Sound level meters listed above comply with
the International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications, as recommended in TM issued
under the NCO. The acoustic
calibrator and sound level meter to be used in the impact monitoring will be
calibrated yearly.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.5.10 DO and water temperature should be measured in-situ by a DO/temperature
meter. The instrument should be portable and weatherproof using a DC power source.
It should have a membrane electrode
with automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. The equipment
should be capable of measuring:
•
DO level in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200%
saturation; and
•
temperature of between 0 and 45 degree Celsius.
3.5.11 A portable pH meter capable of measuring a range between 0.0 and 14.0
should be provided to measure pH under the specified conditions accordingly to
the APHA Standard Methods.
3.5.12 The instrument should be portable and weatherproof using a DC power
source. It should have a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity
between 0-1000 NTU.
3.5.13 A
portable, battery-operated echo sounder or tape measure will be used for the
determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station as
appropriate.
3.5.14 A water
sampler e.g. Kahlsico Water Sampler, which is a
transparent PVC cylinder with capacity not less than 2 litres,
will be used for water sampling if water depth over than 0.5m. For sampling from very shallow
water depths e.g. <0.5 m, water sample collection will be directly from
water surface below 100mm use sampling plastic bottle to avoid inclusion of bottom
sediment or humus. Moreover,
Teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling buckets maybe used for
water sampling. The equipment used
for sampling will be depended the sampling location and depth situations.
3.5.15 Water
samples for laboratory measurement of SS will be collected in high density
polythene bottles, packed in ice (cooled to 4 ºC without being frozen), and
delivered to the laboratory in the same day as the samples were collected.
3.5.16 Analysis
of suspended solids should be carried out in a HOKLAS or other accredited
laboratory. Water samples of about 1L should be collected at the monitoring
stations for carrying out the laboratory suspended solids determination. The SS determination work should start
within 24 hours after collection of the water samples. The SS analyses should
follow the APHA Standard Methods 2540D
with Limit of Reporting of 2 mg/L.
3.5.17 Water
quality monitoring equipment used in the impact monitoring is listed in Table
3-7. Suspended solids (SS) analysis is
carried out by a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory, namely ALS Technichem
(HK) Pty Ltd.
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Depth Detector |
Eagle Sonar or tape
measures |
Water
Sampler |
A
2-litre transparent PVC cylinder with latex cups at both ends or teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling
bucket |
Thermometer
& DO meter |
YSI
PRO20 Handheld Dissolved Oxygen Instrument / YSI 550A Multifunctional Meter/ |
pH meter |
AZ8685 pH pen-style meter |
Turbidimeter |
Hach 2100Q / YSI Professional DSS |
Sample
Container |
High
density polythene bottles (provided by laboratory) |
Storage Container |
¡¥Willow¡¦ 33-liter plastic cool box with Ice
pad |
1-hour TSP Monitoring
3.6.1
The 1-hour TSP monitor was a brand named ¡§Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass Profiler
& Counter¡¨ which is a portable, battery-operated laser photometer. The 1-hour TSP meter provides a real
time 1-hour TSP measurement based on 90o light scattering. The 1-hour TSP monitor consists of the
following:
(a.)
A pump to draw sample aerosol through the
optic chamber where TSP is measured;
(b.)
A sheath air system to isolate the aerosol in
the chamber to keep the optics clean for maximum reliability; and
(c.)
A built-in data logger compatible with
Windows based program to facilitate data collection, analysis and reporting.
3.6.2
The 1-hour TSP meter is used within the valid
period as follow manufacturer¡¦s Operation and Service Manual.
3.6.3
The equipment used for 24-hour TSP
measurement is Tisch
Environmental, Inc. Model TE-5170 TSP high volume air sampling system, which complied with EPA Code of Federal Regulation, Appendix B
to Part 50. The High Volume Air Sampler (HVS) consists of the following:
(a.)
An anodized aluminum shelter;
(b.)
A 8¡¨x10¡¨ stainless steel filter holder;
(c.)
A blower motor assembly;
(d.)
A continuous flow/pressure recorder;
(e.)
A motor speed-voltage control/elapsed time
indicator;
(f.)
A 7-day mechanical timer, and
(g.)
A power supply of 220v/50 Hz
3.6.4
The HVS is operated and calibrated on a
regular basis in accordance with the manufacturer¡¦s instruction using Tisch Calibration Kit Model TE-5025A. Calibration would carry out in two month
interval.
3.6.5
24-hour TSP is collected by the ET on filters
of HVS and quantified by a local HOKLAS accredited laboratory, ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd (ALS), upon receipt of the
samples. The ET keep all the
sampled 24-hour TSP filters in normal air conditioned room conditions, i.e. 70%
RH (Relative Humidity) and 25oC, for six months prior to disposal.
3.6.6
Noise measurements were taken in terms of the
A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level (Leq)
measured in decibels dB(A). Supplementary statistical
results (L10 and L90) were also obtained for reference.
3.6.7
During
the monitoring, all noise measurements were performed with the meter set to
FAST response and on the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level
(Leq). Leq(30min)
in six consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
were used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700-1900
hours on weekdays; and also Leq(15min) in
three consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
is used as monitoring parameter for other time periods (e.g. during restricted
hours), if necessary.
3.6.8
Prior
of noise measurement, the accuracy of the sound level meter is checked using an
acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. The checking was
performed before and after the noise measurement.
Water Quality
3.6.9
Water
quality monitoring is conducted at the designated locations. The sampling
produce with the in-situ monitoring are presented as below:
Sampling Procedure
3.6.10 A Digital Global Positioning System (GPS) is used to identify the
designated monitoring stations prior to water sampling. A portable, battery-operated echo
sounder is used for the determination of water depth at each station. At each station, water sample would be
collected from 0.1m below water surface or the water surface to prevent the
river bed sediment for stirring.
3.6.11 The sample
container will be rinsed with a portion of the water sample. The water sample then will be
transferred to the high-density polythene
bottles as provided by the laboratory, labeled with a unique sample
number and sealed with a screw cap.
3.6.12 Before sampling,
general information such as the date and time of sampling, weather condition as
well as the personnel responsible for the monitoring would be recorded on the
field data sheet.
3.6.13 A ¡¥Willow¡¦
33-liter plastic cool box packed with ice will be used to preserve the water
samples prior to arrival at the laboratory for chemical determination. The water temperature of the cool box is
maintained at a temperature as close to 40C as possible without
being frozen. Samples collected are
delivered to the laboratory upon collection.
In-situ Measurement
3.6.14 Instrument
including YSI PRO20 Handheld Dissolved Oxygen Instrument or YSI 550A
Multifunctional Meter or YSI Professional DSS is used for water in-situ measures, which automates the
measurements and data logging of temperature, dissolved oxygen and dissolved
oxygen saturation. Before each round of monitoring, the dissolved
oxygen probe would be calibrated by the wet bulb method.
3.6.15 A portable AZ8685
pH pen-style meter is used for in-situ
pH measurement. The pH meter is
capable of measuring pH in the range of 0 ¡V 14 and readable to 0.1.
3.6.16 A portable Hach 2100Q Turbidimeter or YSI Professional DSS is used for in-situ
turbidity measurement. The turbidity meter is capable of measuring turbidity in
the range of 0 ¡V 1000 NTU. StablCal®
Standards of known NTU are used for calibration of the
instrument before and after measurement.
3.6.17 All
in-situ measurement equipment are calibrated by HOKLAS
accredited laboratory of three month interval.
Laboratory Analysis
3.6.18 All water samples are analyzed
with Suspended Solids (SS) as specified in the
EM&A Manual by a local HOKLAS-accredited testing laboratory (ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd HOKLAS registration no. 66).
SS analysis is
determined by the laboratory upon receipt of the water samples using APHA Standard Methods 2540D (namely ALS Method EA-025 as
accredited HOKLAS Scheme) started within 48
hours of water sample receipt.
3.7.1
Calibration of the HVS is performed upon
installation and thereafter at bimonthly intervals in accordance with the
manufacturer¡¦s instruction using the certified standard calibrator (TISCH Model
TE-5025A).
Moreover, the Calibration Kit would be
calibrated annually. The calibration data are properly documented and the
records are maintained by ET for future reference.
3.7.2
The 1-hour TSP
meter was calibrated by the supplier prior to purchase. Zero response of the equipment would be
checked before and after each monitoring event. Annually calibration with the High
Volume Sampler (HVS) in same condition would be undertaken by the Laboratory.
3.7.3
The sound level
meter and calibrator are calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited
under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme at yearly basis.
3.7.4
All water quality monitoring equipment is
calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month intervals.
3.7.5
The calibration certificates of all
monitoring equipment used for the impact monitoring program in the Reporting
Period and the HOKLAS accredited certificate of laboratory are presented in
the relevant monthly EM&A reports.
3.8.1
The baseline results form the basis for
determining the environmental acceptance criteria for the impact monitoring. According to the approved Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Manual, the air quality, construction noise and water
quality criteria were set up, namely Action and Limit levels are listed in Tables
3-8, 3-9 and 3-10.
Table 3-8 Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (mg /m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
||
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
|
AM1b |
265 |
143 |
500 |
260 |
AM2 |
268 |
149 |
||
AM3 |
269 |
145 |
||
AM4b |
267 |
148 |
||
AM5a |
268 |
143 |
||
AM6 |
269 |
148 |
||
AM7b |
275 |
156 |
||
AM8 |
269 |
144 |
||
AM9b |
271 |
151 |
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Monitoring Location |
Action Level |
Limit Level in dB(A) |
Time Period: 0700-1900 hours on normal
weekdays |
||
NM1, NM2a, NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8,
NM9, NM10 |
When one or more documented complaints are
received |
75 dB(A)Note 1 & Note 2 |
Note 1: Acceptable Noise Levels for school should be reduced to 70 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) during examination period
Note 2: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the NCA have to be followed.
Table 3-10 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameter |
Performance criteria |
Monitoring Location |
|||||
WM1 |
WM2A(a) |
WM2B |
WM3x |
WM4 |
|||
DO
(mg/L) |
Action Level |
(*)4.23 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.74 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.14 |
|
Limit Level |
(#)4.19 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.60 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.08 |
||
Turbidity
(NTU) |
Action Level |
51.3 |
24.9 |
11.4 |
13.4 |
35.2 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of
the same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
67.6 |
33.8 |
12.3 |
14.0 |
38.4 |
||
AND
130% of upstream control
station of the same day |
|||||||
SS
(mg/L) |
Action Level |
54.5 |
14.6 |
11.8 |
12.6 |
39.4 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of the
same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
64.9 |
17.3 |
12.4 |
12.9 |
45.5 |
||
AND
130% of upstream control
station of the same day |
|||||||
Remarks: (*) The
Proposed Action Level of Dissolved Oxygen is adopted to be
used 5%-ile of baseline data (**) The Proposed Action & Limit Level of Dissolved Oxygen is used 4mg/L (#) The Proposed Limit Level of Dissolved Oxygen is adopted to be
used 1%-ile of baseline data |
|||||||
3.8.2
Should non-compliance of the environmental
quality criteria occurs, remedial actions will be triggered according to the
Event and Action Plan which presented in Appendix E.
3.9.1
All monitoring data will be handled by the ET¡¦s in-house data recording and management
system. The monitoring data recorded in the equipment
will be downloaded directly from the equipment at the end of each monitoring
day. The downloaded monitoring data
will input into a computerized database properly maintained by the ET. The laboratory results will be input
directly into the computerized database and checked by personnel other than
those who input the data.
3.9.2
For monitoring parameters that require laboratory
analysis, the local laboratory shall follow the QA/QC requirements as set out
under the HOKLAS scheme for the relevant laboratory tests.
4.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505 and
air quality monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
4.2.1
Summary of air quality monitoring
results during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 4-1. The
relevant graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Monitoring Location |
1-hour TSP (µg/m3) |
24-hour TSP (µg/m3) |
||||
Max |
Min |
Mean |
Max |
Min |
Mean |
|
AM1b |
127 |
33 |
91 |
124 |
51 |
84 |
Record Date |
29-Dec-16 |
26-Nov-16 |
48 events |
20-Jan-17 |
24-Nov-16 |
16 events |
AM2 |
146 |
42 |
102 |
147 |
33 |
115 |
Record Date |
16-Jan-17 |
26-Nov-16 |
48 events |
3-Jan-17 |
9-Jan-17 |
16 events |
AM3 |
206 |
40 |
107 |
138 |
16 |
108 |
Record Date |
16-Jan-17 |
26-Nov-16 |
48 events |
6-Dec-16 |
24-Nov-16 |
16 events |
AM4b |
115 |
36 |
82 |
115 |
24 |
67 |
Record Date |
21-Dec-16 |
22-Nov-16 |
48 events |
8-Dec-16 |
26-Nov-16 |
16 events |
AM5a |
126 |
35 |
81 |
119 |
12 |
74 |
Record Date |
17-Jan-17 |
22-Nov-16 |
48 events |
20-Dec-16 |
26-Nov-16 |
16 events |
AM6 |
130 |
39 |
84 |
146 |
43 |
98 |
Record Date |
17-Jan-17 |
22-Nov-16 |
48 events |
14-Dec-16 |
26-Nov-16 |
16 events |
AM7b |
124 |
43 |
84 |
139 |
19 |
88 |
Record Date |
27-Jan-17 |
10-Nov-16 |
48 events |
21-Jan-17 |
26-Nov-16 |
16 events |
AM8 |
129 |
47 |
83 |
99 |
22 |
59 |
Record Date |
23-Jan-17 |
10-Nov-16 |
48 events |
8-Dec-16 |
16-Jan-17 |
16 events |
AM9b |
181 |
31 |
103 |
85 |
22 |
58 |
Record Date |
2-Dec-16 |
26-Jan-17 |
48 events |
6-Dec-16 |
12-Nov-16 |
16 events |
4.2.2
Breaches of air quality A/L levels and
statistical analysis of compliance for the air quality monitoring results are
summarized in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Air Quality A/L Levels
Location |
Exceedance |
1-hour TSP |
24- hour TSP |
Total |
AM1 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM2 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM3 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM4a |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM5a |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM6 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM7b |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM8 |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AM9b |
Action Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.2.3
In the
Reporting Period, all the 1-hour
TSP and 24-hour TSP monitoring results were below the Action/Limit Levels. No Notification of Exceedance (NOE) was
issued in this Reporting Period.
4.2.4
The summary of weather conditions during the Reporting
Period is presented in Appendix G.
5.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505 and
noise monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
5.2.1
The sound level meter was set in 1m from the
exterior of the building façade including noise monitoring locations NM1, NM2,
NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8 and NM9. No façade correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical principles and EPD
guidelines. However, free-field
status is performed at NM2a and NM10 and façade correction (+3 dB(A) has added according to the requirement.
5.2.2
Summary of noise monitoring results
during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 5-1. The
relevant graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
Table 5-1 Summary of Construction Noise
Monitoring Results
Monitoring
Location |
Leq, 30min (dB((A)) |
|
Max |
Min |
|
NM1 |
63 |
52 |
Record Date |
20-Dec-16 & 26-Jan-17 |
21-Nov-16 |
NM2/ NM2a(*) |
72 |
61 |
Record Date |
20-Dec-16 |
3-Nov-16 8-Dec-16 |
NM3 |
65 |
57 |
Record Date |
15-Dec-16 |
4-Nov-16 10-Nov-16 |
NM4 |
71 |
63 |
Record Date |
4-Nov-16 |
28-Nov-16 17-Jan-17 |
NM5 |
62 |
49 |
Record Date |
21-Dec-16 |
30-Dec-16 |
NM6 |
67 |
55 |
Record Date |
21-Dec-16 |
28-Nov-16 |
NM7 |
71 |
59 |
Record Date |
21-Dec-16 |
17-Jan-17 |
NM8 |
60 |
56 |
Record Date |
3-Nov-16 14-Dec-16 |
21-Nov-16 |
NM9 |
64 |
61 |
Record Date |
9-Nov-16 |
2-Dec-16 14-Dec-16 |
NM10(*) |
68 |
61 |
Record Date |
2-Dec-16 10-Jan-17 |
3-Nov-16 |
(*) façade
correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical principles
and EPD guidelines
5.2.3
Breaches of construction noise A/L
levels and statistical analysis of compliance for construction noise monitoring
results are summarized in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2 Summaries
of Breaches of Construction Noise A/L Levels
Station |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Received Date |
NM1 |
0 |
1 |
2 November 2017 |
NM2/ NM2a |
0 |
||
NM3 |
0 |
||
NM4 |
0 |
||
NM5 |
0 |
||
NM6 |
0 |
||
NM7 |
0 |
||
NM8 |
0 |
||
NM9 |
0 |
||
NM10 |
0 |
5.2.4
In
this Reporting Period, the noise level
measured at all designated monitoring locations were below 75dB(A).
No Limit Level exceedance was triggered and no corrective action was required.
5.2.5
However,
there was a noise complaint which triggered the Action Level exceedance
received in the period of 31 October to 2 November 2016. The investigation report for the
complaint has completed by the ET which concluded that the complaint was not
related to the project.
5.3.1
In the Reporting
Period, CNPs were granted by Contracts
2, 3, 6, 7 and SS C505 for use of Powered
Mechanical Equipment (PME) during restricted hour. As confirmed by both Contractors with
their works schedules, construction works would be conducted at Contract 6 and
7 during restricted hours with the granted CNP. Noise monitoring was therefore conducted
at the relevant noise monitoring locations during respective restricted hour
periods.
5.3.2
Based on the works schedule by the Contractor of Contracts
2, 3, 6, 7 and SS C505 the involved noise
monitoring locations included NM1, NM7, NM8, NM9 and NM10. Summary of noise monitoring results
during the Reporting Period are tabulated in Table 5-3. The relevant graphical plots throughout
the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
Table 5-3 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results for Restricted Hours
Monitoring
Location |
Evening (Leq5min), dB(A) |
Night time Leq
(Leq5min), dB(A) |
||
Max |
Min |
Max |
Min |
|
NM5 |
53 |
45 |
53 |
45 |
Record Date |
18-Nov-16 |
25-Nov-16 20-Jan-17 |
6-Jan-17 |
4-Nov-16 26-Jan-17 |
NM7 |
60 |
44 |
57 |
43 |
Record Date |
30-Dec-16 |
16-Dec-16 |
20-Dec-16 |
25-Nov-16 |
NM8 |
64 |
56 |
63 |
52 |
Record Date |
13-Jan-17 |
11-Nov-16 9-Dec-16 |
4-Nov-16 |
2-Dec-16 |
NM9 |
NA |
NA |
66 |
59 |
Record Date |
NA |
NA |
20-Jan-17 |
5-Nov-16 |
NM10(*) |
NA |
NA |
59 |
55 |
Record Date |
NA |
NA |
27-Jan-17 |
5-Nov-16 |
NM1 |
52 |
49 |
64 |
60 |
Record Date |
25-Nov-16 |
2-Dec-16 |
13-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
NM4 |
56 |
42 |
64 |
60 |
Record Date |
20-Jan-17 |
6-Jan-17 |
13-Oct-16 |
28-Oct-16 |
Remarks: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the NCA have to be followed.
(*) façade
correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical
principles and EPD guidelines
5.3.3
According to the site
records by the monitoring team, no construction noise from the construction was
noted during the course of monitoring at all locations. On the other hand, traffic noise was
dominated at NM8 and NM9 since the monitoring locations were closed to the
train tracks and very serious dogs barking were recorded at NM10. Therefore, it is considered that the
measurement results were likely to be the background noise.
6.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project has been commenced in Contracts 2, 3, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505 and
water quality monitoring was performed at all designated locations.
6.2.1
Summary of monitoring results during the
Reporting Period are tabulated in Tables
6-1 and 6-4. The relevant
graphical plots throughout the Reporting Period are presented in Appendix F.
6.2.2
In accordance with ¡§Event
and Action Plan¡¨, the water quality monitoring
frequency shall be increased to daily when exceedance recorded at the exceeded
monitoring location. In the Reporting Period, 38 days of scheduled water monitoring were
conducted. Moreover, 10, 1, 8 and 3 days of extra water sampling were
conducted for WM2A(a), WM2B, WM3 and WM4 and all its control
station.
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 5
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
WM1 |
WM1- Control |
|
Min |
6.0 |
5.8 |
9.8 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
<2 |
Max |
9.8 |
9.7 |
50.8 |
41.4 |
50.5 |
23.0 |
Average |
8.2 |
8.1 |
22.6 |
7.7 |
21.2 |
3.9 |
Table 6-2 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 3
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
||||||
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
WM4 |
WM4 - CA |
WM4 - CB |
|
Min |
6.57 |
7.14 |
4.40 |
6.15 |
2.22 |
4.54 |
5.50 |
<2 |
4.00 |
Max |
9.34 |
10.04 |
7.73 |
242.50 |
215.00 |
107.50 |
126.50 |
690.50 |
98.00 |
Average |
7.95 |
8.38 |
6.60 |
28.12 |
16.57 |
15.79 |
26.81 |
44.41 |
15.54 |
Table 6-3 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 6
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||||||||
WM2A(a) |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
WM2A(a) |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
WM2A(a) |
WM2A-C |
WM2B |
WM2B-C |
|
Min |
7.0 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
6.3 |
7.5 |
4.7 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
4.0 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
Max |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.4 |
8.3 |
319.0 |
84.5 |
306.5 |
7.0 |
223.0 |
44.0 |
368.5 |
5.5 |
Average |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.5 |
7.2 |
45.9 |
12.4 |
14.7 |
3.3 |
35.0 |
6.9 |
15.8 |
2.8 |
Table 6-4 Summary
of the Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V Contract 2 & 6
Statistics |
DO
(mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS
(mg/L) |
|||
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
WM3 |
WM3- Control |
|
Min |
6.4 |
5.6 |
2.7 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
Max |
8.9 |
8.6 |
531.5 |
28.9 |
826.0 |
37.0 |
Average |
7.6 |
7.0 |
39.3 |
6.1 |
55.4 |
9.2 |
6.2.3
Breaches of water quality A/L levels and
statistical analysis of compliance for the water quality monitoring results are
summarized in Tables 6-5.
Table 6-5 Summaries
of Breaches of the Existing Water Quality A/L Levels
Reporting Period |
No. of sampling day |
Location |
DO (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
SS (mg/L) |
|||
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
|||
Nov-16 |
13 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
10 |
|
14 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
21 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
|
14 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Dec-16 |
13 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
13 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
13 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
14 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Jan-17 |
12 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
12 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
12 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
13 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Total |
38 |
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
2 |
13 |
|
39 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
46 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
|
41 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
Sum |
0 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
2 |
28 |
6.2.4
In the Reporting Period, a total of 55 Action Level (AL)/ Limit Level (LL) exceedances namely 25 AL/LL exceedances of turbidity and 30 LL exceedances of SS were recorded. NOEs
were issued to relevant parties upon confirmation of the
results.
6.2.5
Investigation
reports for the exceedance were conducted by the ET and the investigation
results revealed that 6 out of 55 exceedances were related to the works under the project. The detailed investigation
reports are summarized
in Table 6-6 and presented in the relevant
monthly EM&A reports.
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Date of Exceedance |
Location |
Exceeded Parameter |
Cause of Water Quality Exceedance In Brief
|
2 and 4 Nov 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed the
exceedances were related to the exposed slope adjacent to the river
course. As remedial measures, CCKJV
was immediately hard paved the exposed slope and erected sand bag barrier at
the edge of slope. There were no exceedances recorded on the subsequent water
quality monitoring 5 and 7 November 2016, thus it is considered that the remedial measures
provided by CCKJV were effective. |
9 and 10 Nov 2016 |
WM3x (C2 and C6) |
NTU &SS |
CCKJV
reported that a pipe which carrying slurry from H-pipe works area to primary
sedimentation tank at Wo Keng Shan was burst
accidentally in the morning of 10 November 2016. The burst pipe was
immediately replaced but some slurry was flowing into the adjacent river
channel. In
our investigation, it is considered that the exceedances on 9 November 2016
were due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the
Project. For the exceedances on
10 November 2016, it is considered that the exceedances were related to the
pipe burst incident. CCKJV was
advised to regularly check up the condition of
water pipe particularly carrying untreated water and ensure the wastewater
treatment systems are well maintained. |
15 Nov 2016 |
WM4 (C2 and C3) |
NTU &SS |
The
IR revealed that muddy water was found in the river branch from Kiu Tau Road from an active construction site by other
Contractor. In our investigation,
it is considered that exceedances were due to the muddy water from the
outside of site boundary and not likely related to the works under the
Contract. |
11, 12, 14 and 15 Nov 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that
the water mitigation measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse
water impact was identified.
Moreover, there were no rain recorded during the exceedance days and
surface runoff generated from the site area was unlikely to occur. It is considered the exceedances were
due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the project. |
15 and 16 Nov 2016 |
WM3x (C2 and C6) |
NTU &SS |
CCKJV
reported that a portion of area Sha Tau Kok Road was
handed over to other Contractor since 5 September 2016 and discharge of
turbid water to the gully was observed in that portion area on 15 and 16
November 2016. In
our investigation, it is considered that the exceedances were due to the
discharge of muddy water by other Contractor and unlikely caused by the works
under the Project. |
22, 23 and 24 Nov 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
According to the
rainfall record from the Hong Kong Observatory (HKO), there were rainstorms
on 22 and 23 November 2016. Muddy
water generated from runoff from the surrounding environment and turbid water
was also found throughout Ping Yeung River. Thick sediment was cumulated at the
river bed and more muddy water was generated under vigorous water flow and
stir up sediment. In our
investigation, the implementation of water mitigation measures on site was in
order and no adverse water quality impact was observed. It is considered that the exceedances
on 22 and 23 November 2016 were due to rainstorm and exceedances on 24
November 2016 was due to residual impact after rainstorm and not caused by
the works under the Contract. |
19, 21, 22 and 23, 25, 26 and 28 Nov 2016 |
WM3x (C2 and C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that there was
thick sediment cumulated at the channel bed of Ng Tung River and muddy
turbulence was readily formed under water flow. In our investigation, it is considered
that the exceedances were likely due to the muddy turbulence formed by the
loose sediment cumulated at the channel bed. Moreover, exceedances on 22, 23
and 26 November 2016 were also related to impact by rain. |
26 Nov 2016 |
WM2B (C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that there was
heavy rain on 26 November 2016and runoff from public road and getting into
the channel was observed. It is considered that the exceedance were due
rainstorm and runoff from road and not likely caused by the Project |
28 and 30 Nov 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that
the water mitigation measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse
water impact was identified.
Moreover, there were no rain recorded during the exceedance days and
surface runoff generated from the site area was unlikely to occur. It is considered the exceedances were
due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the project. |
6, 7 and 8 Dec 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that
the water mitigation measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse
water impact was identified. Moreover,
there were no rain recorded during the exceedance days and surface runoff
generated from the site area was unlikely to occur. It is considered the exceedances were
due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the project. |
17 Dec 2016 |
WM4 (C2 and C3) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that
suspected direct discharge of untreated water was observed from construction
site by the utility contractor near Tai Wo Service Road West (TWSRW) and
muddy water was found at the box culvert under its site area. In our investigation, it is
considered that exceedances were not likely related to the works
under both Contracts 2 and 6. |
29 Dec 2016 |
WM2A(a) (C6) |
NTU &SS |
The IR revealed that
the water mitigation measures implemented on site was in order and no adverse
water impact was identified.
Moreover, there were no rain recorded during the exceedance days and
surface runoff generated from the site area was unlikely to occur. It is considered the exceedances were
due to natural variation and unlikely caused by the works under the project. |
21 Jan 2017 |
WM4 (C2 and C3) |
NTU &SS |
During
weekly site inspection at South Portal of
Contract 2, it was
observed the wastewater treatment facility implemented on site was function
properly and the treated water to be discharge was visually clear.
The site condition was generally in order
and no adverse water quality impacts and abnormal situation under the Contract were identified. Moreover, there was no rain recorded on
21 January 2017 and runoff from the site was unlikely to occur. In our investigation, it is considered
that exceedances were due to natural
variation and unlikely
related to the works under the Contract. During
weekly site inspection by ET at Contracts 3 in January 2017, it was
observed that no excessive wastewater was generated from the active
construction works and the water quality in the existing river channel adjacent
to the construction site was clear. The site condition was generally in order
and no adverse water quality impacts and abnormal situation under the Contract were identified. Moreover, there was no rain recorded on 21 January 2017 and runoff
from the site was unlikely to occur. In our investigation, it is considered
that exceedances were due to natural
variation and unlikely
related to the works under the Contract
3. |
7.1.1
Ecology
monitoring for woodland compensation was shall
be conducted at bi-monthly interval. The
ecological monitoring report (Nov-Dec 2016) was submitted to EPD in January
2017 and the ecological monitoring report (Jan-Feb 2017) was submitted to EPD
in March 2017.
8.1.1
Waste management was carried out by an
on-site Environmental Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time.
8.2.1
All types of waste arising from the
construction work are classified into the following:
l
Construction & Demolition (C&D)
Material;
l
Chemical Waste;
l
General Refuse
8.2.2
Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable. The
quantities of waste for disposal in the Reporting Period are summarized in Tables
8-1 and 8-2 and the Waste Flow Table is presented in Appendix H.
Table 8-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Type of Waste |
Contract No |
Quantity |
Disposal
Location |
|||
Nov 2016 |
Dec 2016 |
Jan 2017 |
Total |
|||
C&D Materials (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
100.2462 |
75.9804 |
59.9685 |
357.589 |
- |
3 |
0.747 |
0.675 |
1.15 |
|
||
6 |
35.682 |
28.5 |
39.926 |
- |
||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
SS C505 |
4.841 |
6.713 |
3.16 |
- |
||
Reused in this Project (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
0.4509 |
0.9293 |
0.4203 |
52.845 |
- |
3 |
0.201 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
- |
||
6 |
8.541 |
10.447 |
19.095 |
- |
||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
SS C505 |
4.0475 |
6.44 |
2.003 |
- |
||
Reused in other Projects (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
45.5418 |
26.2843 |
26.9277 |
115.737 |
C6/ NENT# & other projects approved by the ER |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
6 |
4.298 |
6.618 |
6.067 |
C5 & other projects approved by the ER |
||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||
Disposal as Public
Fill (Inert) (in '000m3) |
2 |
54.2534 |
48.7668 |
32.6205 |
188.534 |
Tuen Mun 38 TKO 137 |
3 |
0.407 |
0.425 |
0.796 |
|||
6 |
22.843 |
11.435 |
14.764 |
|||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.793 |
0.273 |
1.157 |
Remark:
(#)The C&D materials were delivered to
NENT for reuse by laying cover of the landfilling area.
Since major construction activities under
Contractor 5 have been substantially completed on 31 August 2016, no data was presented
for Sep 2016 and Oct 2016.
Table 8-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Type of Waste |
Contract No |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
|||
Nov 2016 |
Dec 2016 |
Jan 2017 |
Total |
|||
Recycled Metal (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
65.172 |
21.791 |
9.687 |
1121.332+0.002# |
By licensed
collector |
3 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|||
SS C505 |
268.18 |
298.052 |
458.15 |
|||
Recycled Paper / Cardboard Packing (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
0.45 |
0.32 |
0.3 |
2.78 |
By licensed
collector |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0.252 |
0.228 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.54 |
0 |
0.56 |
|||
Recycled
Plastic (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
2.5623 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
7.5633+0.002# |
By licensed collector |
3 |
0.001 |
0 |
0.001 |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.087 |
0.053 |
0.058 |
|||
Chemical
Wastes (¡¥000kg) # |
2 |
2.464 |
3.3 |
1.76 |
7.524 |
By licensed collector |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
General
Refuses (¡¥000m3) |
2 |
0.3216 |
0.2052 |
0.1931 |
2.6939 |
NENT |
3 |
0.125 |
0.12 |
0.17 |
|||
6 |
0.115 |
0.065 |
0.065 |
|||
7 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.01 |
|||
SS C505 |
0.423 |
0.39 |
0.481 |
Remark:
(#) Unit of recycled
metal, recycled paper/ cardboard packing, recycled plastic and chemical waste
for Contractor 3 was in (¡¥000m3).
8.2.3
To control the site performance on waste management, the
Contractor shall ensure that all solid and liquid waste management works are
fully in compliance with the relevant license/permit requirements, such as the
effluent discharge license and the chemical waste producer registration. The Contractor is also reminded to
implement the recommended environmental mitigation measures according to the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Manual.
9.1.1
According to the approved EM&A Manual, the
environmental site inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Weekly environmental site inspections should
carry out to confirm the environmental performance.
Contract 2
9.1.2
During
the Reporting Period, 13 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken
at Contract 2 to evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-1 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-1 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 2
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2016 |
4, 11, 18 and
25 November 2016 |
3 |
Completed |
December 2016 |
2, 9, 16, 19
and 30 December 2016 |
2 |
Completed |
January 2017 |
6, 13, 20 and
27 January 2017 |
3 |
Completed |
9.1.3
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 8 observations/ reminders were recorded
during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly
site inspection were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Contract 3
9.1.4
During
the Reporting Period, 12 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken
at Contract 3 to evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-2 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 3
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2016 |
7, 6, 21 and
28 November 2016 |
4 |
Completed |
December 2016 |
5, 12, 21 and
29 December 2016 |
1 |
Completed |
January 2017 |
3, 9, 18 and
23 January 2017 |
5 |
Completed |
9.1.5
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 10 observations/ reminders were recorded
during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly
site inspection were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Contract 6
9.1.6
During
the Reporting Period, 13 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken
at Contract 6 to evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-4 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-4 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 6
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2016 |
3, 10, 17 and
24 November 2016. |
8 |
Completed |
December 2016 |
1, 8, 15, 22
and 29 December 2016 |
3 |
Completed |
January 2017 |
5, 12, 19 and
26 January 2017 |
3 |
Completed |
9.1.7
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 14 observations/ reminders were recorded
during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly
site inspection were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Contract SS
C505
9.1.8
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract SS C505 to
evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-5 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-5 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract SS C505
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2016 |
2, 9, 17, 23
and 30 November 2016 |
8 |
Completed |
December 2016 |
7, 14, 20 and
28 December 2016 |
10 |
Completed |
January 2017 |
5, 11, 18 and
23 January 2017 |
6 |
Completed |
9.1.9
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 24 observations/ reminders were recorded
during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly
site inspection were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Contract 7
9.1.10
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken at Contract SS C505 to
evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Table 9-6 and the details of site
inspection can be found in relevant EM&A monthly
report.
Table 9-6 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection ¡V Contract 7
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
Follow-Up Status |
November 2016 |
1, 8, 15, 22
and 29 November 2016 |
5 |
Completed |
December 2016 |
6, 13, 20 and
28 December 2016 |
1 |
Completed |
January 2017 |
3, 10, 17 and
24 January 2017 |
4 |
Completed |
9.1.11
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded; however, 10 observations/ reminder were recorded
during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly
site inspection were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Other
Contracts
9.1.12 Since the
construction work of Contract 5 has substantially completed and Contract 4 has not
commenced, no site inspection was performed.
10.1.1 In the Reporting Period, no non-compliance, no summons and prosecution under the EM&A Programme was recorded and lodged for the Project. However, seven (7) documented environmental complaints were received and the summary of complaint received in the Reporting Period is listed below.
4 November
2016 (Contracts 2 and 6) ¡V A complaint was received from 1823 on 4 November
2016 regarding muddy water discharged out of the construction sites near the
traffic light post at the junction of Sha Tau Kok
Road and Wo Keng Shan Road. The suspected muddy water from the
construction site affecting the environment and causing inconvenience to the
pedestrian and public. In our investigation, the site exits
near the complaint location under the project were satisfactory. Even though the inspection was carried
out in rainy day, no muddy water discharge out of the construction site to the
public roads was observed. It is
considered that the suspected muddy water discharge from the works area out to
Sha Tau Kok Road and Wo Keng
Shan Road was unlikely due to the project. As advised by both contractors, road
washing/ cleaning by water bowsers was provided along Wo Keng
Shan Road to Sha Tau Kok Road in every normal working
day (Mon-Sat), except for rainy day.
Moreover, road sweeping would be provided for the concerned roads twice
a week. To address the
complainant¡¦s concern, the ET will keep closely inspection on the cleanliness
situation on both roads during weekly site inspection.
31 October
and 2 November 2017 (Contract 7) ¡V A
complaint was received from 1823 regarding noise nuisance generated from the
piling works for the cross-boundary bridges under CEDD's works contract at 10pm
on 31 October 2016. On 2 November
2016, the same complainant contact 1823 again and complained the same issue and
a photo showing the concerned piling works was provided by the complainant.
According to the complaint details, it is considered that the concerned period
of the complainant would be 31 October to 2 November 2016. As discussed with the Contractor
of Contract 7 (KRSJV), the machinery appeared in Photo provided by the
complainant was pre-bored socketed pile in Bridge A. According to the site diary provided by
KRSJV 7 during 31 October to 2 November 2016, apart from the operation of
generator for lighting and some material preparation works without use of any
PME carried out at Portion G till 22:00, there were no piling works undertaken
within the construction site after 19:00 on 31 October and 1 to 2 November
2016. Since there were no piling works
undertaken by KRSJV during the concerned period, it is considered that the
complaint was not valid to the Contract.
Nevertheless, KRSJV is reminded to strictly comply with CNP requirement
when there would be works undertaken during restricted hours and noise
mitigation measures as recommended in the EM&A Programme should be adopted
as far as practicable.
16 November 2016 (Contract 6) - A complaint was received from 1823 on 16
November 2016 regarding construction of road bridge at
higher ground level near Nga Yiu Ha Village caused
water flowing to the complainant¡¦s water well and led to flooding. Moreover, the complainant pointed out
that severe noise impact was generated and uneven presidential road were formed
due to the construction. According
to the complaint description, the related site area should be Bridge D and Ping
Yeung Interchange under Contract 6.
In our investigation, no deficiencies due to construction under the
Contract were identified and affecting Nga Yiu Ha
Village. Since the complaint
location could not be found, it is considered the complaint was not evident due
to the Contract and no remedial action was taken by CCKJV. Nevertheless, ET will keep closely
monitor the site condition and status of implemented mitigation measures by
CCKJV. Also, CCKJV is reminded to
fully implement the mitigation measures as recommended in the EM&A
Programme.
19 December 2016 (Contract 6) - A complaint was received from the
project hotline on 19 December 2016 regarding the complainant dissatisfied with
the construction noise and vibration generated by the construction works which
affecting her residence. She
requested immediate follow up and associated improvement from relevant department.
The Contractor of Contract 6 (CCKJV)
has immediately liaised with the complainant and it was figured out that the
main concern of the complainant was the vibration generated by the sheet piling
work. Therefore, it was not considered as a noise complaint and no Action level
was triggered. Besides, vibration
is not an environmental aspect under EM&A programme for this complaint
location. In our investigation,
CCKJV has implemented noise mitigation measures to further reduce the noise
impact to the nearby resident. To
eliminate the inconvenience caused to the nearby resident, CCKJV agreed to
start the sheetpile work after 9:00am every day and
the concerned piling works is expected to be completed in early January
2017. The complainant was
satisfactory with the arrangement undertaken by CCKJV. Since the most construction areas under
the Contract are close to the resident of village, CCKJV was reminded to
implement the mitigation measures as far as practicable as recommended in the
EM&A Programme.
16 January
2017 (Contracts 2 & 6) - A complaint was received from 1823 on 16
January 2017 regarding muddy water found on the ground near the traffic light
post at the junction of Sha Tau Kok (STK) Road and Wo
Keng Shan (WKS) Road and it was suspected the muddy
water was come from the construction site. The cumulated muddy water splashed on the
pedestrian when vehicle passing by which causing inconvenience to the public
and the complainant requested the related department to follow
up. Joint site inspection was carried
out by RE, IEC, Contractors and ET on 19 and 20 January 2017 at the suspected
four (4) site exits along the Sha Tau Kok Road and Wo
Keng Shan Road and the traffic light post for the
complaint investigation. As advised by both contractors, road washing/ cleaning by water bowsers was provided along
Wo Keng Shan Road to Sha Tau Kok Road in every normal working day (Mon-Sat), except for
rainy day. Moreover, road sweeping
would be provided for the concerned roads twice a week
to maintain cleanliness of the roads. In our investigation, no cumulated muddy water and mud trails were observed and the site exits
near the complaint location were satisfactory. It is considered that the complaint was unlikely due to the project. To address the
complainant¡¦s concern, the ET will keep closely inspection on the cleanliness
situation on both roads during weekly site inspection.
3 January 2017 (Contract 2) - DSD conducted site inspection on 3 January
2017 at Kwan Tei River near Po Kak Tsai and suspected
construction foul water was found in the branch of Kwan Tei River. Subsequent site inspection in Kwan Tei
River was conducted by DSD and EPD on 6 and 10 January 2017 respectively for
further investigation. According
to DSD¡¦s inspection report, a discharge of slurry had smothered Kwan Tei River
and wiped out the Firefly trial site which was meant to be a showcase of river
health and the return of diverse freshwater life in the region. On EPD¡¦s inspection on 10 January 2017,
it revealed that the open channel which received discharge from the
construction site was accumulated with slurry. According to the inspection
records from DSD and EPD, the source of foul water was suspected to be
construction site of Mid-Vent under Contract 2. Joint site inspection among the RE, IEC, Contractor
of Contract 2 (DHK) and ET was carried out on 13 January 2017 in Mid-vent and Kwan Tei River for the complaint investigation. In our investigation, it is considered
that the complaint was caused by the inadvertent and unintentional emergency
discharge by DHK in their consideration of safety of the people working inside
the Adit. To maintain the wastewater water system,
DHK has already increased to the frequency of sludge removal of the wastewater
treatment facility to 3-5 times daily to reduce the load of the water pump. In our response to the complaint, DHK
was advised that replacement by spare water pump should be made immediately when
any malfunction event is alerted. Moreover, additional measures for flood
control such as additional retention tanks or flood gates were recommended. In case of any emergence discharge, DHK
should immediately clean up the deposition at the downstream channel to avoid water
contamination spreading further downstream.
25 January 2017 (Contract 2) - EPD received a complaint from the public
who provided photos and video showing grey slurry was discharging to Kwan Tei
River. According to the photo and
video provided, the river was polluted by the grey slurry and part of the
harden slurry was deposited at the river side which seriously affecting the
ecology of the river course. The complainant
requested the related department to follow up and promptly clean up the slurry.
Joint site
inspection among the RE, IEC, Contractor of Contract 2 (DHK) and ET was carried
out on 27 January 2017, 3 and 10
February 2017 in Mid-Vent Portal works and its downstream channel for the
complaint investigation. In our investigation, the suspected
complaint location was where the cleansing work was in progress, so the public
might see muddy water flowing along the stream. Nevertheless, DHK has installed silt
screens and sand trap at the downstream area of the cleansing work to avoid the
muddy water being washed downstream. As advised by DHK, they have cleared the
sludge and DSD has no further comment during the joint inspection with DSD and
AECOM on 8 February 2017.
10.1.2
Upon receipt of the complaint, follow up action has been undertaken
by both Contractor promptly to resolve the complaints and deficiencies. Investigation for the complaint was
carried out by ET independently and the associated investigation reports were
submitted to relevant parties. In
the Reporting Period, two (2)
out of seven
(7)
complaints was considered as project related and remedial action have been undertaken by the
relevant Contractor.
10.1.3
The statistical summary table of
environmental complaint, summons and prosecution are presented in Tables 10-1, 10-2
and 10-3.
Table 10-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
|||
Frequency
(Project related
complaint) |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
Project related
complaint |
||
2 |
Nov 2016 |
1 |
26 |
(16)Water Quality (7) Dust (2) Noise (1) dust & noise |
(5) water (2) dust (1) noise |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
||||
Jan 2017 |
3 |
||||
3 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
4 |
(1) Dust (2) Water quality (1) Noise |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
||||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
||||
5 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
4 |
(3) Dust (1) Noise |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
||||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
||||
6 |
Nov 2016 |
2 |
30 |
(22) Water Quality (6) Dust (1) Noise (1) Nuisance |
(6) water (2) dust (1) Nuisance |
Dec 2016 |
1 |
||||
Jan 2017 |
1 |
||||
7 |
Nov 2016 |
1 |
1 |
(1) Noise |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
||||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
||||
SS C505 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
2 |
(1) Dust (1) Noise |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
||||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
Table 10-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Summons Statistics |
||||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||||
Water |
Air |
Noise |
||||
2 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
5 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
6 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
7 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS C505 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 10-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Contract No |
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Prosecution Statistics |
||||
Frequency |
Cumulative since commencement of project |
Complaint Nature |
||||
Water |
Air |
Noise |
||||
2 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
5 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
6 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
7 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
SS C505 |
Nov 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dec 2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Jan 2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10.1.4
Since
the construction works at the Contract 5 was substantially completed and
Contract 4 has not yet commenced, no environmental complaint, summons and
prosecution under the EM&A Programme are registered in the Reporting
Period.
11.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that
recommended in the Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation
Measures (ISEMM) in the approved EM&A Manual covered the issues of dust,
noise, water and waste and they are summarized presented in Appendix
I.
11.1.2
All contracts under the Project shall be
implementing the required environmental mitigation measures according to the approved
EM&A Manual as subject to the site condition. Environmental mitigation measures
generally implemented by Contracts 2, 3, 5, 6 and SS C505 in this Reporting
Period are summarized in Table 11-1.
Table 11-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Water Quality |
¡P Wastewater to be treated by
the filtration systems i.e. sedimentation tank or AquaSed before to discharge. |
Air Quality |
¡P Maintain damp / wet surface
on access road ¡P Keep slow speed in the sites ¡P All vehicles must use wheel
washing facility before off site ¡P Sprayed water during
breaking works ¡P A
cleaning truck was regularly performed on the public road to prevent fugitive dust emission |
Noise |
¡P Restrain operation time of
plants from 07:00 to 19:00 on any working day except for Public Holiday and
Sunday. ¡P Keep good maintenance of
plants ¡P Place noisy plants away from
residence or school ¡P Provide noise barriers or
hoarding to enclose the noisy plants or works ¡P Shut down the plants when
not in used. |
Waste and Chemical
Management |
¡P On-site sorting prior to
disposal ¡P Follow requirements and
procedures of the ¡§Trip-ticket System¡¨ ¡P Predict required quantity of
concrete accurately ¡P Collect
the unused fresh concrete at designated locations in the sites for subsequent
disposal |
General |
¡P The site was generally kept
tidy and clean. |
12.1.1 This is the
14th Quarterly EM&A Summary
Report presenting the monitoring results and inspection findings for the
Reporting Period from 1 November 2016 to 31 January 2017.
12.1.2 For air
quality monitoring, no 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring results triggered the
Action or Limit Levels were recorded. No NOEs or the
associated corrective actions were therefore issued.
12.1.3
In the Reporting Period, no construction noise exceedances were recorded and no complaints (which
triggered the Action Level exceedances) were
received which triggered the Action Level exceedances.
12.1.4
For water quality monitoring, a total of 55 Action Level (AL)/ Limit Level (LL) exceedances namely 25 AL/LL exceedances of turbidity and 30 LL exceedances of SS were recorded. The
investigation reports for cause of exceedances were conducted by ET and
submitted to relevant parties. In the Reporting Period, 6 out
of 55
exceedances were considered as project related and remedial action had
undertaken by the Contractor.
12.1.5 Ecology
monitoring for woodland compensation for the
period of November to December 2016 was submitted to EPD in January 2017. The Monitoring Report
for Woodland Compensation was prepared
and submitted as a stand-alone report as supplementary for the EM&A Report.
12.1.6 During the
Reporting Period, weekly joint site inspections for Contract 2, Contract 3,
Contract 6, Contract 7 and Contract SS C505 were undertaken to evaluate the
site environmental performance. No non-compliances were observed during the weekly
site inspection and environmental audit of the Reporting Period, indicating the
implemented mitigation measures for air quality, construction noise and water
quality were effective. Minor
deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general rectified
within the specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
12.1.7 In this
Reporting Period, seven (7) documented environmental complaints were received for the
Project. Upon receipt
of the complaint, follow up action has been undertaken by both Contractor
promptly to resolve the complaints and deficiencies. Investigation for the complaint was
carried out by ET independently and the associated investigation reports were
submitted to relevant parties. In
the Reporting Period, two (2) out of seven (7)
complaints were considered as project related and remedial action had undertaken
by the Contractor.
12.1.8 No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period.
12.2.1 During dry
season, special attention should be paid on the potential construction dust
impact since most of the construction sites are adjacent to villages. The
Contractor should fully implement the construction dust mitigation measures.
12.2.2 Preventive
measures for muddy water or other water pollutants from site surface flow to local
stream such as Kong Yiu Channel, Ma Wat Channel, Ping
Yuen River or public area should be properly maintained. The Contractors should paid special
attention on water quality mitigation measures and fully implement according
ISEMM of the EM&A Manual, in particular for working areas near Ma Wat
Channel and Ping Yuen River.
Moreover, all effluent discharge shall be ensure to fulfill Technical
Memorandum of Effluent Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, inland
and Coastal Waters criteria or discharge permits stipulation.
12.2.3 Construction
noise is also a key environmental
issue during construction of the Project. Noise mitigation measures should be
implemented in accordance with the EM&A requirement.