|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Job No.: TCS00694/13 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Agreement No. CE 45/2008
(CE) Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
and Associated Works |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report
(No.56) ¡V March 2018 |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared For |
|
|
||
|
|
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) |
|
|
||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
16 April 2018 |
TCS00694/13/600/R1509v3 |
|
|
Nicola Hon (Environmental Consultant) |
Tam Tak Wing (Environmental Team Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Remarks |
1 |
10 April 2018 |
First
Submission |
2 |
16 April 2018 |
Amended according to the IEC¡¦s comment on 12
April 2018 |
3 |
16 April 2018 |
Amended according to the IEC¡¦s comment on 16
April 2018 |
executive summary
ES01
This is the 56th monthly EM&A
report presenting the monitoring results and inspection findings for the
reporting period from 1 to 31 March 2018 (hereinafter ¡¥the
Reporting Period¡¦).
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Activities
ES02
To facilitate the project management and
implementation, Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai
Boundary Control Point and Associated Works of the Project is
divided to seven CEDD contracts including Contract 2 (CV/2012/08), Contract 3 (CV/2012/09), Contract 4 (NE/2014/02), Contract 5 (CV/2013/03), Contract
6 (CV/2013/08) and Contract 7 (NE/2014/03) and an ArshSD
contract (Contract SS C505).
ES03
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction works under Liantang/Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works of the Project
included Contract 2, Contract 3, Contract 4, Contract
6, Contract 7 and Contract SS C505.
Environmental monitoring activities under the EM&A programme in the
Reporting Period are summarized in the following table.
Environmental Aspect |
Environmental Monitoring Parameters /
Inspection |
Reporting Period |
|
Number of Monitoring Locations to undertake |
Total Occasions |
||
Air Quality |
1-hour
TSP |
9 |
135 |
24-hour
TSP |
9 |
50 |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
10 |
45 |
Water Quality |
Water in-situ measurement and/or sampling |
WM1
& WM1-C |
14 Scheduled & 0 extra |
WM2A(a)
& WM2A-Cx |
14 Scheduled & 0 extra |
||
WM2B
& WM2B-C |
14 Scheduled & 0 extra (*) |
||
WM3x
&WM3-C |
14 Scheduled & 2 extra |
||
WM4,
WM4-CA &WM4-CB |
14 Scheduled & 0 extra |
||
Ecology |
Woodland
compensation i)
General Health condition of planted species ii) Survival
of planted species |
9
Quadrats and transect |
0 |
Joint Site Inspection / Audit |
IEC, ET,
the Contractor and RE joint site Environmental Inspection and Auditing |
Contract
2 |
5 |
Contract
3 |
5 |
||
Contract
4 |
5 |
||
Contract
6 |
5 |
||
Contract
7 |
5 |
||
Contract
SS C505 (#) |
4 |
Remark:
(#) IEC only joined one (1) event of site inspection for Contract SS
C505.
(*) In
the whole Reporting Period, water sampling was unable to carry out at WM2B and WM2B-C due to shallow
water (water depth under 150mm)
Action and Limit (A/L) Levels exceedance
ES04
In the Reporting Period, no air quality and construction noise exceedance and valid noise
complaint was recorded. For water quality monitoring, a total of
four (4) Limit Level
exceedances were recorded under the Project. The summary of exceedance in the
Reporting Period is shown below.
Environmental Aspect |
Monitoring
Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Event
& Action |
|||
NOE
Issued |
Investigation
Result |
Project
related exceedance |
Corrective
Actions |
||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
24-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq(30min) Daytime |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
-- |
-- |
Turbidity |
0 |
2 |
2 |
-
All exceedances
were not project related. |
0 |
The Contractor should fully implement water quality mitigation measure. |
|
SS |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
ES05
Investigation
Report for all water quality exceedances was completed by ET. Investigation results revealed that the
Contractor had properly implemented water quality mitigation measures such as well-maintained
the wastewater treatment facility and covered the expose area with impervious
sheet. It was concluded that all the exceedances were not related to the works
under the Project. Nevertheless, the Contractor was reminded to fully implement
the water quality mitigation measure
throughout the constriction phase as far as practicable.
Environmental
Complaint
ES06
In this Reporting
Period, two (2) documented environmental complaints were received under the
EM&A programme regarding to the dust and water quality issue on Sha Tau Kok Road and Lin Ma Hang Road. The investigation for the complaint was
completed by ET. The IRs revealed
that the conditions of all site exits under the Project were well maintained
without mud and debris and no excessive water spraying and slurry was found on
the complaint roads. Since there
were many other heavy vehicles apart from the project using complaint roads and
mitigation measures were properly implemented by the Contractor, it is
considered that the complaints were not related to the works under the Project.
Notification of
Summons and Successful Prosecutions
ES07
No environmental summons
and prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting Period.
Reporting Change
ES08
No reporting changes
were made in the Reporting Period.
ES09
In this Reporting Period, joint site inspection to evaluate the site
environmental performance at Contract 2 has been carried out by
the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on 1, 9, 16, 23 and
28 March 2018.
No non-compliance was noted during the site inspection.
ES10
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection to evaluate the site environmental performance at Contract
3 has been carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on 1, 8, 15, 21 and 29 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted during the site
inspection.
ES11
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection to evaluate
the site environmental performance at Contract 4 has been
carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and
the Contractor on 2, 9, 16, 19 and 28
March 2018. No non-compliance was noted.
ES12
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection to evaluate the site environmental performance at Contract
6 has been carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on 2, 8, 15, 22 and 29 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted during the site
inspection.
ES13
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract 7 to
evaluate the site environmental performance has been carried out by the RE,
IEC, ET and the Contractor on 2, 9, 16, 22 and
28 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted during the site
inspection.
ES14
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection to evaluate the site environmental performance at Contract
SS C505 has been carried out by the RE, ET and the Contractor on 7, 14, 21 and 28
March 2018 in which IEC joined the site inspection on 28
March 2018. No non-compliance was noted during the site
inspection.
Future Key Issues
ES15
As wet season is approaching, preventive measures for muddy
water or other water pollutants from site surface flow to local stream such as Kong Yiu Channel, Ma
Wat Channel, Ping Yuen River, Kwan
Tei River
or public area should be properly maintained. The Contractors should paid special attention on water
quality mitigation measures and fully implement according ISEMM of the EM&A
Manual, in particular for working areas near Ma Wat Channel and Ping Yuen
River.
ES16
In addition, all effluent
discharge shall be ensure to fulfill Technical Memorandum of Effluent
Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, inland and Coastal Waters
criteria or discharge permits stipulation.
ES17
Construction noise would
be a key environmental issue during construction work of the Project. Noise mitigation measures such as using
quiet plants should be implemented in accordance with the EM&A requirement.
ES18
Since most of construction sites under the Project are
located adjacent to villages, the Contractors should fully
implement air quality mitigation measures to reduce construction dust emission.
Table of Contents
2 Project
Organization and Construction progress
2.1 Construction
Contract Packaging
2.5 Summary of Environmental Submissions
3 Summary
of Impact Monitoring Requirements
3.4 Monitoring
Frequency and Period
3.8 Derivation
of Action/Limit (A/L) Levels
3.9 Data
Management and Data QA/QC Control
4.2 Air
Quality Monitoring Results
5 Construction
Noise Monitoring
6.2 Results
of Water Quality Monitoring
8.2 Records
of Waste Quantities
9.2 Findings
/ Deficiencies During the Reporting Month
10 Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
10.1 Environmental
Complaint, Summons and Prosecutions
11 Implementation
Status of Mitigation Measures
11.2 Tentative
Construction Activities in the Coming Month
11.3 Key
Issues for the Coming Month
12 Conclusions
and Recommendations
List
of TABLES
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Table 3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Table 3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-8 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Table 3-10 Action and Limit
Levels for Water Quality
Table 4-1 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM1a
Table 4-2 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM2
Table 4-3 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM3
Table 4-4 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM4B
Table 4-5 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM5a
Table 4-6 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM6
Table 4-7 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM7a
Table 4-8 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM8
Table 4-9 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM9b
Table 5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Table 5-2 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Table 6-1 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results for Contract 2 and 3
Table 6-2 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results for Contract 6 and SS C505
Table 6-3 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results for Contract 6
Table 6-4 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results for Contract 2 and 6
Table 6-5 Action
and Limit (A/L) Levels Exceedance Recorded
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Table 8-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 8-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 9-1 Site
Observations for Contract 2
Table 9-2 Site
Observations for Contract 3
Table 9-3 Site
Observations for Contract 4
Table 9-4 Site
Observations for Contract 9
Table 9-5 Site
Observations for Contract c505
Table 9-6 Site
Observations for Contract 7
Table 10-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 10-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 10-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Table 11-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List of Appendices
Appendix
A Layout Plan of the
Project
Appendix
B Organization Chart
Appendix
C 3-month rolling
construction program
Appendix
D Designated
Monitoring Locations as Recommended in the Approved EM&A Manual
Appendix
E Monitoring
Locations for Impact Monitoring
Appendix
F Calibration
Certificate of Monitoring Equipment and HOKLAS-accreditation Certificate of the
Testing Laboratory
Appendix
G Event and Action
Plan
Appendix
H Impact Monitoring
Schedule
Appendix
I Database of
Monitoring Result
Appendix
J Graphical
Plots for Monitoring Result
Appendix
K Meteorological
Data
Appendix
L Waste Flow Table
Appendix
M Implementation Schedule
for Environmental Mitigation Measures
Appendix
N Investigation
Report for Exceedance
Appendix O Investigation
Report for Complaint
1.1.1
Civil Engineering and Development Department is the Project Proponent and the Permit Holder of Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE)
Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works,
which is a Designated Project to be implemented under Environmental Permit
number EP-404/2011/D granted on 20 January 2017.
1.1.2
The Project consists of two main components: Construction of a Boundary
Control Point (hereinafter referred as ¡§BCP¡¨); and Construction of a connecting
road alignment. Layout plan of the Project is shown in Appendix A.
1.1.3
The proposed BCP is located at the boundary with Shenzhen near the
existing Chuk Yuen Village, comprising a main
passenger building with passenger and cargo processing facilities and the
associated customs, transport and ancillary facilities. The connecting road alignment consists
of six main sections:
1)
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area (FCA) Boundary ¡V this section
comprises at-grade and viaducts and includes the improvement works at Lin Ma
Hang Road;
2)
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan ¡V this section
stretches from the Frontier Closed Area Boundary to the tunnel portal at Cheung
Shan and comprises at-grade and viaducts including an interchange at Ping
Yeung;
3)
North Tunnel ¡V this section comprises the tunnel segment at Cheung Shan and
includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel;
4)
Sha Tau Kok Road ¡V this section stretches from
the tunnel portal at Wo Keng Shan to the tunnel
portal south of Loi Tung and comprises at-grade and
viaducts including an interchange at Sha Tau Kok and
an administration building;
5)
South Tunnel ¡V this section comprises a tunnel segment that stretches from
Loi Tung to Fanling and
includes a ventilation building at the portals on either end of the tunnel as
well as a ventilation building in the middle of the tunnel near Lau Shui Heung;
6)
Fanling ¡V this section comprises the at-grade, viaducts and interchange
connection to the existing Fanling Highway.
1.1.4
Action-United
Environmental Services & Consulting has
been commissioned as an Independent ET to implement the relevant
EM&A program in accordance with the
approved EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties. As part of the EM&A program,
the baseline monitoring has carried out between 13 June 2013 and 12 July
2013 for all parameters including air quality, noise and water quality
before construction work commencement.
The Baseline Monitoring Report summarized the key findings and the
rationale behind determining a set of Action and Limit Levels (A/L Levels) from
the baseline data. Also, the
Project baseline monitoring report which verified by the IEC has been submitted
to EPD on 16 July 2013 for
endorsement. The major construction
works of the Project was commenced on 16
August 2013 in accordance with the EP Section 5.3 stipulation.
1.1.5
This is 56th monthly EM&A
report presenting the monitoring results and inspection findings for reporting period from 1 to 31 March 2018.
1.2.1
The Monthly Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) Report is structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Project Organization and Construction
Progress
Section 3 Summary
of Impact Monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air Quality Monitoring
Section 5 Construction Noise Monitoring
Section 6 Water Quality Monitoring
Section 7 Ecology Monitoring
Section 8 Waste Management
Section 9 Site Inspections
Section 10 Environmental
Complaints and Non-Compliance
Section 11 Implementation
Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 12 Conclusions
and Recommendations
2.1.1
To facilitate the project management and
implementation, the Project would be divided by the following contracts:
¡P
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
¡P
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
¡P
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
¡P
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
¡P
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
¡P
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
¡P
ArchSD Contract No. SS C505
2.1.2
The
details of each contracts is summarized below and the delineation of each contracts is shown in Appendix A.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.1.3
Contract 2 has awarded in December 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 19 May 2014. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 2 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
an approximately 5.2km long dual two-lane connecting road (with about 0.4km of
at-grade road and 4.8km of tunnel) connecting the Fanling Interchange with the
proposed Sha Tau Kok Interchange;
¡P
construction of a
ventilation adit tunnel and the mid-ventilation
building;
¡P
construction of
the north and south portal buildings of the Lung Shan Tunnel and their associated
slope works;
¡P
provision and
installation of ventilation system, E&M works and building services works
for Lung Shan tunnel and Cheung Shan tunnel and their portal buildings;
¡P
construction of
Tunnel Administration Building adjacent to Wo Keng
Shan Road and the associated E&M and building services works; and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.1.4
Contract 3 was awarded in July 2013 and
construction work was commenced on 5 November 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 3 is
listed below:
¡P
construction of
four link roads connecting the existing Fanling Highway and the south portal of
the Lung Shan Tunnel;
¡P
realignment of
the existing Tai Wo Service Road West and Tai Wo Service Road East;
¡P
widening of the
existing Fanling Highway (HyD¡¦s
entrustment works);
¡P
demolishing
existing Kiu Tau vehicular bridge and Kiu Tau footbridge and reconstruction of
the existing Kiu Tau Footbridge (HyD¡¦s entrustment
works); and
¡P
construction of associated
footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks,
landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.1.5
Contract
4 has awarded in mid-April 2016 and
construction work was commenced
on 2 May 2017. The scope of work of the Contract 4
includes:
¡P
design, supply,
delivery, installation, testing and commissioning of a traffic control and
surveillance system for the connecting road linking up the Liantang / Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and the existing Fanling Highway.
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.1.6
Contract 5 has awarded in April 2013 and
construction work was commenced in August 2013. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 5 is
listed below:
¡P
site formation of about 23
hectares of land for the development of the BCP;
¡P
construction of an
approximately 1.6 km long perimeter road at the BCP including a 175m long
depressed road;
¡P
associated
diversion/modification works at existing local roads and junctions including
Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
construction of pedestrian
subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang Road;
¡P
provision of resite area with supporting infrastructure for reprovisioning of the affected village houses; and
¡P
construction of associated footpath, slopes, retaining structures, drainage,
sewerage, waterworks, landscaping works and other ancillary works.
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.1.7
Contract 6 has awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 6 would
be included below:
construction of an approximately 4.6km long dual two-lane connecting
road (with about 0.6km of at-grade road, 3.3km of viaduct and 0.7km of tunnel)
connecting the BCP with the proposed Sha Tau Kok Road
Interchange and the associated ventilation buildings;
associated diversion/modification works at access roads to the resite of Chuk Yuen Village;
provision of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities for
the BCP and the resite of Chuk
Yuen Village;
construction of a pedestrian subway linking the BCP to Lin Ma Hang
Road;
provisioning of the affected facilities including Wo Keng Shan Road garden; and
construction of associated footpath, slopes, retaining
structures, drainage, sewerage, waterworks, landscaping works and other
ancillary works.
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.1.8
Contract 7 has awarded in December 2015 and
the construction works of Contract 7 was commenced on 15 February 2016. Major Scope of Work of the Contract 7 would
be included below:
construction of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) portion of four vehicular bridge
construction of one pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen (SZ) River
(cross boundary bridges)
ArchSD Contract No. SS C505
2.1.9
SS C505 has awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. Major Scope of Work of the SS C505 would
be included below:
passenger-related facilities including
processing kiosks and examination facilities for private cars and coaches,
passenger clearance building and halls, the interior fitting works for the
pedestrian bridge crossing Shenzhen River, etc.;
cargo processing facilities including kiosks
for clearance of goods vehicles, customs inspection platforms, X-ray building,
etc.;
accommodation for the facilities inside of the
Government departments providing services in connection with the BCP;
transport-related facilities inside the BCP
including road networks, public transport interchange, transport drop-off and
pick-up areas, vehicle holding areas and associated road furniture etc;
a public carpark; and
other ancillary
facilities such as sewerage and drainage, building services provisions and
electronic systems, associated environmental mitigation measure and landscape
works.
2.2.1
The project organization is shown in Appendix B. The
responsibilities of respective parties are:
Civil
Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)
2.2.2
CEDD is the Project Proponent and the Permit Holder of the EP of the development
of the Project and will assume overall responsibility for the project. An
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) shall be employed by CEDD to audit the
results of the EM&A works carried out by the ET.
Architectural
Services Department (ArchSD)
2.2.3
ArchSD acts as
the works agent for Development Bureau (DEVB), for Contract SS C505 Liantang/
Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point (BCP) ¡V BCP Buildings and Associated
Facilities.
Environmental
Protection Department (EPD)
2.2.4
EPD is the statutory enforcement body for
environmental protection matters in Hong Kong.
Ronald Lu
& Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd (The Architect)
2.2.5
Ronald Lu & Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd is
appointed by ArchSD as an Architect for Contract SS
C505 Liantang/ Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point (BCP) ¡V BCP Buildings and
Associated Facilities. It
responsible for overseeing the construction works of Contract SS C505 and for
ensuring that the works are undertaken by the Contractor in accordance with the
specification and contract requirements. The duties and responsibilities of the
Architect with respect to EM&A are:
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the
environmental mitigation measures and their effectiveness
Monitor Contractors¡¦ and ET¡¦s compliance with
the requirements in the Environmental Permit (EP) and EM&A Manual
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the EM&A
programme
Participate in joint site inspection by the ET
and IEC
Oversee the implementation of the agreed Event
/ Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project discussing regarding the
cumulative impact issues.
Engineer
or Engineers Representative (ER)
2.2.6
The ER is responsible for overseeing the
construction works and for ensuring that the works are undertaken by the
Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract requirements. The
duties and responsibilities of the ER with respect to EM&A are:
¡P
Monitor the Contractors¡¦ compliance with
contract specifications, including the implementation and operation of the
environmental mitigation measures and their effectiveness
¡P
Monitor Contractors¡¦s,
ET¡¦s and IEC¡¦s compliance with the requirements in the Environmental Permit
(EP) and EM&A Manual
¡P
Facilitate ET¡¦s implementation of the
EM&A programme
¡P
Participate in joint site inspection by the
ET and IEC
¡P
Oversee the implementation of the agreed
Event / Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with DSD, Engineer/Engineer¡¦s
Representative, ET, IEC and the Contractor of the ¡§Construction of the DSD¡¦s Regulaiton of Shenzhen River Stage 4 (RSR 4)¡¨ Project
discussing regarding the cumulative impact issues.
The
Contractor(s)
2.2.7
There will be one contractor for each
individual works contract. Once the contractors are appointed, EPD, ET and IEC
will be notified the details of the contractor.
2.2.8
The Contractor for Contracts under CEDD
should report to the ER. For ArchSD Contract, the
Contractor should report to the Architect or Architect¡¦s Representative (AR).
The duties and responsibilities of the Contractor are:
¡P
Comply with the relevant contract conditions
and specifications on environmental protection
¡P
Employ an Environmental Team (ET) to
undertake monitoring, laboratory analysis and reporting of EM &A Facilitate
ET¡¦s monitoring and site inspection activities
¡P
Participate in the site inspections by the ET
and IEC, and undertake any corrective actions
¡P
Provide information / advice to the ET
regarding works programme and activities which may contribute to the generation
of adverse environmental impacts
¡P
Submit proposals on mitigation measures in
case of exceedances of Action and Limit levels in accordance with the Event /
Action Plans
¡P
Implement measures to reduce impact where
Action and Limit levels are exceeded
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
Environmental Team (ET)
2.2.9
Once the ET is appointed, the EPD, CEDD, ER,
Architect and IEC will be notified the details of the ET.
2.2.10
The ET shall not be in any way an associated
body of the Contractor(s), and shall be employed by the Project
Proponent/Contractor to conduct the EM&A programme. The ET should be managed by the ET
Leader. The ET Leader shall be a person who has at least 7 years¡¦ experience in
EM&A and has relevant professional qualifications. Suitably qualified staff
should be included in the ET, and resources for the implementation of the
EM&A programme should be allocated in time under the Contract(s), to enable
fulfillment of the Project¡¦s EM&A requirements as specified in the EM&A
Manual during construction of the Project.
The ET shall report to the Project Proponent and the duties shall
include:
¡P
Monitor and audit various environmental
parameters as required in this EM&A Manual
¡P
Analyse the
environmental monitoring and audit data, review the success of EM&A
programme and the adequacy of mitigation measures implemented, confirm the
validity of the EIA predictions and identify any adverse environmental impacts
arising
¡P
Carry out regular site inspection to
investigate and audit the Contractors¡¦ site practice, equipment/plant and work
methodologies with respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation,
and effect proactive action to pre-empt problems
¡P
Monitor compliance with conditions in the EP,
environmental protection, pollution prevention and control regulations and
contract specifications
¡P
Audit environmental conditions on site
¡P
Report on the environmental monitoring and
audit results to EPD, the ER, the Architect, the lEC
and Contractor or their delegated representatives
¡P
Recommend suitable mitigation measures to the
Contractor in the case of exceedance of Action and Limit levels in accordance
with the Event and Action Plans
¡P
Liaise with the IEC on all environmental
performance matters and timely submit all relevant EM&A proforma
for approval by IEC
¡P
Advise the Contractor(s) on environmental
improvement, awareness, enhancement measures etc., on site
¡P
Adhere to the procedures for carrying out
complaint investigation
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, ET, lEC and the
Contractor(s) of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
2.2.11
One IEC will be employed for this Project.
Once the IEC is appointed, EPD, ER, the Architect and ET will be notified the
details of the IEC.
2.2.12
The Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
should not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor or the ET for the
Project. The IEC should be employed by the Permit Holder (i.e., CEDD) prior to
the commencement of the construction of the Project. The IEC should have at
least 10 years¡¦ experience in EM&A and have relevant professional
qualifications. The appointment of IEC should be subject to the approval of
EPD. The IEC should:
¡P
Provide proactive advice to the ER and the
Project Proponent on EM&A matters related to the project, independent from
the management of construction works, but empowered to audit the environmental
performance of construction
¡P
Review and audit all aspects of the EM&A
programme implemented by the ET
¡P
Review and verify the monitoring data and all
submissions in connection with the EP and EM&A Manual submitted by the ET
¡P
Arrange and conduct regular, at least monthly
site inspections of the works during construction phase, and ad hoc inspections
if significant environmental problems are identified
¡P
Check compliance with the agreed Event /
Action Plan in the event of any exceedance
¡P
Check compliance with the procedures for
carrying out complaint investigation
¡P
Check the effectiveness of corrective
measures
¡P
Feedback audit results to ET by signing off
relevant EM&A proforma
¡P
Check that the mitigation measures are
effectively implemented
¡P
Verify the log-book(s) mentioned in Condition
2.2 of the EP, notify the Director by fax, within one working day of receipt of
notification from the ET Leader of each and every occurrence, change of
circumstances or non-compliance with the EIA Report and/or the EP, which might
affect the monitoring or control of adverse environmental impacts from the
Project
¡P
Report the works conducted, the findings, recommendation
and improvement of the site inspections, after reviewing ET¡¦s and Contractor¡¦s
works, and advices to the ER and Project Proponent on a monthly basis
¡P
Liaison with the client departments,
Engineer/Engineer¡¦s Representative, the Architect, ET, lEC
and the Contractor of the concurrent projects as listed under Section 2.3 below
regarding the cumulative impact issues.
2.3.1
The concurrent construction works that may be
carried out include, but not limited to, the following:
(a)
Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage IV;
(b)
Widening of Fanling Highway ¡V Tai Hang to Wo Hop Shek Interchange ¡V Contract No. HY/2012/06;
(c)
Construction of BCP
facilities in Shenzhen.
2.4.1
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction activity conducted under the Project is located in Contracts 2, 3,
6, 7 and SS C505 and they are summarized in below. Moreover, 3-month rolling construction
program for all the current contracts is enclosed in Appendix C.
Contract 2 (CV/2012/08)
2.4.2
The
contract commenced in May 2014. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
Mid-Vent Portal |
Cavern internal structure and tunnel E&M
activities
Construction of C&C structure and permanent
drainage
Structure connecting adit
and ventilation building
Ventilation building superstructure and
backfilling activities
Ventilation building fitting out and E&M
installation |
North Portal |
Southbound and Northbound tunnel waterproofing
and lining
Construction of cross passage and internal
structure
Tunnel backfilling and E&M installation
Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) North drive
excavation and mucking out
North ventilation building structure and internal
structure
Construction of retaining wall and permanent
drainage
Site formation and construction of slip road
Cleansing on existing drainage system
Construction of temporary utility bridge across
the mid-platform |
South Portal |
Tunnel waterproofing, lining and backfilling.
Tunnel internal structure and cross passage
Construction of retaining wall and backfilling
activities
South ventilation building external wall
finishing, fitting out and E&M installations |
Admin Building |
Construction of fence wall and permanent drainage
Admin building fitting out, underground utilities
and E&M installation
Construction of building permanent access. |
Contract 3 (CV/2012/09)
2.4.3
The Contract commenced in November 2013. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
Cable Detection
and Trial Trenches
Remaining Works
on New Kiu Tau Footbridge
Noise Barrier
Construction
Road pavement works
Demolition of Existing
Kiu Tau Vehicular Bridge
Water main
laying works (on Grade and on bridge deck)
Installation of
Noise barrier steel column & panel, and sign gantry
Parapet
Installation on bridge deck
Road Drainage
Work
Construction of
Profile Barrier & Planter Wall on Bridge Deck
Stressing of
External Tendon
Bitumen paving
on bridge deck
Installation of
deck cell inside the bridge deck
Installation of
movement joint on the bridge
Construction of
Retaining Wall Behind Abutment
Landscaping
works
Contract 4 (NE/2014/02)
2.4.4
The
Contract was awarded in mid-April 2016 and the construction work was commenced on 2 May 2017. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
System design
and testing
E&M
installation at Admin Building
E&M
installation at Ventilation Building
High mast
erection
E&M
installation at OHVD in tunnel
Contract 5 (CV/2013/03)
2.4.5
The
construction works under Contract 5 was substantially completed on 31 August
2016.
Contract 6 (CV/2013/08)
2.4.6
Contract 6 has awarded in June 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 23 October 2015. In this Reporting Period,
construction activities conducted are listed below:
Bridge
construction
Tunneling
Works
Sewage
Treatment Plant Construction
Tunnel
Ventilation Building Construction
Slip
Road/At-grade Road/Periphery Road Construction
Contract 7 (NE/2014/03)
2.4.7
Contract 7 has awarded in December 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 15 February 2016. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
Deck
construction at Bridge A
Column and deck construction at Bridge E
Profile barrier construction at Bridges D & E
Installation
of Façade at Bridge C
Installation of BMU at roof of Bridge C
Contract SS C505
2.4.8
Contract SS C505 has awarded in July 2015 and
construction work was commenced on 1 September 2015. In this Reporting Period, construction
activities conducted are listed below:
Building no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and
41 constructions
Constructions of Steel Canopies (Building
no. 32, 33, 34 and 35)
Constructions of Master Water Meter Room 1,
2 and 3 (Building no. 42, 43, 44)
Tower crane operation
Bridge 1 - 5 construction works including
retaining wall, road and finishes works
Underground drainage works, Road Works, CLP
Cable laying and Landscaping
Formwork and falsework for PTB¡¦s slab and
internal wall construction
Construction PTB M/F, 1/F, 2/F and Roof
flat slab
Construction PTB non-structural wall,
Underground Drainage and Utilities, Fence Wall, Southern Entrance Construction
Backfilling works
PTB Major Plant Rooms ABWF & MEP
Installation, Lift and Escalator Installation by NSC
Integrated ABWF & MEP Works in PTB,
Building no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 18, 36 and 41
Elevated Walkway E1, E2, E3 and E4
construction
Tower Crane Dismantling Works
2.5.1
In according to the EP, the required
documents have submitted to EPD which listed in below:
Project Layout Plans of Contracts 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7 and SS C505
Landscape Plan
Topsoil Management Plan
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Programme
Baseline Monitoring Report
(TCS00690/13/600/R0030v3) for the Project
Waste Management Plan of the Contracts 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7 and SS C505
Contamination Assessment Plan (CAP) and
Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) for Po Kat Tsai, Loi
Tung and the workshops in Fanling
Vegetation Survey Report
Woodland Compensation Plan
Habitat Creation Management Plan
Wetland Compensation Plan
2.5.2
Summary of
the relevant permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for the Project of each contracts are presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Status of Environmental
Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Item |
Description |
License/Permit Status |
||||||||
Ref. no. |
Effective Date |
Expiry Date |
||||||||
Contract 2 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref No.: 368864 |
31 Dec 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
North Portal Waste
Producers Number: No.5213-652-D2523-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||
Mid-Vent Portal Waste
Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2524-01 |
25 Mar 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||||
South Portal Waste
Producers Number: No.5213-634-D2526-01 |
9 Apr 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||||
3 |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge License |
No.WT00018374-2014 (South Portal) |
3 Mar 2014 |
28 Feb
2019 |
||||||
No. WT00023063-2015 (North Portal) |
18 Dec 2015 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||||||
No.: W5/1I392 (Admin Building) |
28 Mar 2014 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||||||
No.: WT00025594-2016 (Mid-Vent Portal) |
7 Oct 2016 |
31 Mar 2019 |
||||||||
4 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7019105 |
8 Jan 2014 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0744-17 |
North Portal |
15-Nov-2017 |
09-May-2018 |
|||||
GW-RN0747-17 |
15-Nov-2017 |
09-May-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0839-17 |
25-Dec-2017 |
17-Jun-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0047-18 |
Mid Vent |
05-Feb-2018 |
01-Aug-2018 |
|||||||
GW-RN0049-18 |
05-Feb-2017 |
31-Jul-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0765-17 |
South Portal |
01-Dec-2017 |
31-May-2018 |
|||||||
GW-RN0601-17 |
27-Sep-2017 |
21-Mar-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0673-17 |
28-Oct-2017 |
27-Apr-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0788-17 |
06-Dec-2017 |
05-Jun-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0604-17 |
Admin Bldg |
20-Sep-2017 |
16-Mar-2018 |
|||||||
GW-RN0142-18 |
5-Apr-2018 |
27-Sep-2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0140-18 |
Cheung Shan Tunnel |
3-Apr-2018 |
22-Sep-2018 |
|||||||
6 |
Specified Process License (Mortar
Plant Operation) |
L-3-251(1) |
12 Apr 2016 |
11 Apr 2021 |
||||||
Contract 3 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 362101 |
17 Jul 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number:
No.:5113-634-C3817-01 |
7 Oct 2013 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||
3 |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge License |
No.:WT00016832 ¡V 2013 |
28 Aug 13 |
31 Aug
2018 |
||||||
4 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017914 |
2 Aug 13 |
Till Contract ends |
||||||
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0549-17 |
6 Sep 2017 |
5 Mar 2018 |
||||||
GW-RN0564-17 |
1 Oct 2017 |
31 Mar 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0571-17 |
30 Sep 2017 |
29 Mar 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0669-17 |
25 Oct 2017 |
7 Apr 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0697-17 (cancelled
on 14 Mar 2018) |
21 Nov 2017 |
cancelled on
14 Mar 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0721-17 |
26 Nov 2017 |
20 May 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0782-17 |
8 Dec 2017 |
26 May 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0785-17 |
19 Dec 2017 |
16 Jun 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0786-17 |
24 Dec 2017 |
18 Jun 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0801-17 |
22 Dec
2017 |
21 Jun 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0863-17 |
17 Jan 2018 |
5 Jul 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0043-18 |
25 Feb 2018 |
24 Aug 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0044-18 |
22 Feb 2018 |
21 Aug 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0102-18 |
14 Mar 2018 |
31 Aug 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0123-18 |
28 Mar 2018 |
5 Sep 2018 |
||||||||
Contract 5 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 359338 |
13 May 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-642-S3735-01 |
8 Jun 2013 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
3 |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge License |
No.: W5/1G44/1 |
8 Jun 13 |
30 Jun 2018 |
||||||
4 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7017351 |
29 Apr 13 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
Contract 6 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390614 |
29 Jun 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producers Number No.: 5213-652-C3969-01 |
31 Aug 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
3 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022707 |
9 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
4 |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge License |
No.:WT00024574-2016 |
31 May
2016 |
31 May
2021 |
||||||
No.:WT00024576-2016 |
31 May
2016 |
31 May
2021 |
||||||||
No.:WT00024742-2016 |
14 June 2016 |
30 June 2021 |
||||||||
No.:WT00024746-2016 |
14 June 2016 |
30 June 2021 |
||||||||
5 |
Construction Noise
Permit |
GW-RW0598-17 |
18
Sep 2017 |
17
Mar 2018 |
||||||
GW-RW0684-17 |
30
Oct 2017 |
29
Apr 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RW0668-17 |
16 Jan 2018 |
15 Jul 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RW0086-18 |
1 Mar 2018 |
31 Aug 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RW0127-18 |
25 Mar 2018 |
27 May 2018 |
||||||||
Contract SS C505 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 390974 |
13 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5213-642-L1048-07 |
16 Sep 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
3 |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge License |
No.: WT00024865-2016 |
8 Jul 2016 |
30 Nov 2020 |
||||||
4 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7022831 |
23 Jul 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
5 |
Construction Noise
Permit |
GW-RN0624-17 |
6 Oct 2017 |
5 Apr 2018 |
||||||
GW-RN0720-17 |
26 Nov 2017 |
25 May 2018 |
||||||||
GW-RN0114-18 |
5 Apr 2018 |
4 Oct 2018 |
||||||||
Contract
7 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No: 397015 |
21 Dec 2015 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
Waste Producer No.: 5214-641-K3202-01 |
24 Mar 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
3 |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance - Discharge License |
No.: WT00024422-2016 |
10 May 2016 |
31 May
2021 |
||||||
4 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7024129 |
21 Jan 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
5 |
Construction Noise
Permit |
GW-RN0705-17 |
5 Nov 2017 |
4 May 2018 |
||||||
Contract 4 |
||||||||||
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. No.
405353 |
22 July 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
2 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account for
Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7024973 |
13 May 2016 |
Till the end of Contract |
||||||
3.1.1
The Environmental Monitoring and Audit
requirements are set out in the Approved EM&A manual. Environmental issues
such as air quality, construction noise and water quality were identified as
the key issues during the construction phase of the Project.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the
sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The EM&A program of construction phase
monitoring shall cover the following environmental issues:
•
Air quality;
•
Construction noise; and
•
Water quality
3.2.2
A summary of the monitoring parameters is
presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Environmental Issue |
Parameters |
Air Quality |
1-hour
TSP by Real-Time Portable Dust Meter; and 24-hour
TSP by High Volume Air Sampler. |
Noise |
Leq(30min) in
normal working days (Monday to Saturday) 07:00-19:00 except public holiday;
and 3 sets
of consecutive Leq(5min) on
restricted hours i.e. 19:00 to 07:00 next day, and whole day of public
holiday or Sunday Supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and
L90 shall also be obtained for reference. |
Water Quality |
In-situ Measurements Dissolved
Oxygen Concentration (mg/L); Dissolved
Oxygen Saturation (% ); Turbidity
(NTU); pH unit; Water
depth (m); and Temperature
(¢J). |
Laboratory Analysis
Suspended
Solids (mg/L) |
3.3.1
The designated monitoring locations as
recommended in the EM&A Manual
are shown in Appendix D. As the access to some of the designated
monitoring locations was questionable due to safety reason or denied by the
landlords, alternative locations therefore have had proposed. The latest alternative monitoring locations has been updated in the revised EM&A Programme (Rev.7) which approved by EPD on 7 April 2017. Table
3-2, Table 3-3 and Table 3-4 are respectively listed
the air quality, construction noise and water quality monitoring locations for
the Project and a map showing these monitoring stations is presented in Appendix E.
Table 3-2 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Air Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
AM1b^ |
Open area at Tsung Yuen Ha Village |
BCP |
SS C505 Contract 7 |
AM2 |
Village House
near Lin Ma Hang Road |
LMH to Frontier
Closed Area |
Contract 6 |
AM3 |
Ta Kwu Ling
Fire Service Station of Ta Kwu Ling Village. |
LMH to Frontier
Closed Area |
Contract 6 |
AM4b^ |
House no. 10B1 Nga Yiu Ha Village |
LMH to Frontier
Closed Area |
Contract 6 |
AM5a^ |
Ping Yeung
Village House |
Ping Yeung to
Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM6 |
Wo Keng Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to
Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
AM7b@ |
Loi Tung Village House |
Sha Tau Kok Road |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
AM8 |
Po Kat Tsai
Village No. 4 |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
AM9b# |
Nam Wa Po Village House No. 80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of air quality monitoring location from AM9a
to AM9b was submitted to EPD on 4 Nov 2013 after verified by the IEC and it was
approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (15) in EP 2/N7/A/52 Pt.10 dated 8 Nov 2013).
* Proposal for the change of air quality monitoring location from AM1to
AM1a was submitted to EPD on 24 March 2014 after verified by the IEC. It was
approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (6) in EP 2/N7/A/52 Pt.12 dated 9 Jun 2014).
@ Proposal for the change of air quality monitoring location from AM7a to
AM7b was submitted to EPD on 4 June 2014 after verified by the IEC. It was
approved by EPD (EPD¡¦s ref.: (7) in EP 2/N7/A/52 Pt.12 dated 9 Jun 2014).
^ Proposal for change of air quality monitoring locations was enclosed
in the updated EM&A Programme which approval by EPD on 29 Mar 2016.
Table 3-3 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Construction Noise
Station ID |
Description |
Works Area |
Related to the Work Contract |
NM1 |
Tsung Yuen Ha Village House No. 63 |
BCP |
SS C505 Contract 7 |
NM2a# |
Village House near Lin Ma Hang
Road |
Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed
Area |
Contract 6 |
NM3 |
Ping Yeung Village House (facade
facing northeast) |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM4 |
Wo Keng
Shan Village House |
Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan |
Contract 6 |
NM5 |
Village House, Loi
Tung |
Sha Tau Kok
Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM6 |
Tai Tong Wu Village House 2 |
Sha Tau Kok
Road |
Contract 2, Contract 6 |
NM7 |
Po Kat Tsai Village |
Po Kat Tsai |
Contract 2 |
NM8 |
Village House, Tong Hang |
Fanling |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
NM9 |
Village House, Kiu Tau Village |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
NM10 |
Nam Wa
Po Village House No. 80 |
Fanling |
Contract 3 |
# Proposal for the change of construction noise monitoring location from
NM2 to NM2a was verified by the IEC on 6 May 2016 and was effective on 9 May
2016.
Table 3-4 Impact
Monitoring Stations - Water Quality
Station ID |
Description |
Coordinates of Designated / Alternative Location |
Nature of the location |
Related to the Work Contract |
|
Easting |
Northing |
||||
WM1 |
Downstream of Kong Yiu Channel |
833 679 |
845 421 |
Alternative location located at upstream 51m of the designated location |
SS C505 Contract 6 |
WM1- Control |
Upstream of Kong Yiu Channel |
834 185 |
845 917 |
NA |
SS C505 Contract 6 |
WM2A |
Downstream of River Ganges |
834 204 |
844 471 |
Alternative location located at upstream 81m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2A(a)* |
Downstream of River Ganges |
834 191 |
844 474 |
Alternative location located at upstream 70m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2A- Controlx# |
Upstream of River Ganges |
835 377 |
844 188 |
Alternative location located at upstream 160m of the designated location |
Contract 6 |
WM2B |
Downstream of River Ganges |
835 433 |
843 397 |
NA |
Contract 6 |
WM2B- Control |
Upstream of River Ganges |
835 835 |
843 351 |
Alternative location located at downstream 31m of the designated
location |
Contract 6 |
WM3x# |
Downstream of River Indus |
836 206 |
842 270 |
Alternative location located at downstream 180m of the designated
location |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
WM3- Control |
Upstream of River Indus |
836 763 |
842 400 |
Alternative location located at downstream 26m of the designated
location |
Contract 2 Contract 6 |
WM4 |
Downstream of Ma Wat Channel |
833 850 |
838 338 |
Alternative location located at upstream 11m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control A |
Kau Lung Hang
Stream |
834 028 |
837 695 |
Alternative location located at downstream 28m of the designated
location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
WM4¡V Control B |
Upstream of Ma Wat Channel |
833760 |
837395 |
Alternative location located at upstream 15m of the designated location |
Contract 2 Contract 3 |
Note: EPD has
approved the revised EM&A Programme (Rev.7) which proposed that (1) if the
measured water depth of the monitoring station is lower than 150 mm,
alternative location based on the criteria were selected to perform water
monitoring; and (2) If no suitable alternative location could be found within
15m far from the original location, the sampling at that location will be
cancelled since sampling at too far from the designated location could not make
a representative sample in accordance with the updated EM&A Programme (Rev.
07) (Section 4.1.4) (EPD ref.: ( ) in EP2/N7/A/52 Ax(1) Pt.20 dated 7 April
2017)
(*)
Proposal for the
change of water monitoring location from WM2A to WM2A(a)
was verified by the IEC and it was approved by EPD. (EPD¡¦s ref. (10) in EP
2/N7/A/52 Pt.19)
(#) Proposal for the change of water quality monitoring location (WM3x and WM2A-Cx was included in the EM&A Programme Rev .05 which approved by EPD on 29 March
2016 (EPD ref.: (3) in EP2/N7/A/52 Ax(1) Pt.19)
The requirements of impact monitoring are stipulated in Sections 2.1.6, 3.1.5 and 4.1.6 of the approved EM&A Manual and presented as
follows.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.4.1
Frequency of impact air quality monitoring is
as follows:
1-hour TSP |
3 times every six
days during course of works |
24-hour TSP |
Once every 6 days
during course of works. |
Noise Monitoring
3.4.2
One set of Leq(30min)
as 6 consecutive Leq(5min)
between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays and once every week during course of
works. If construction work
necessary to carry out at other time periods, i.e. restricted time period
(19:00 to 07:00 the next morning and whole day on public holidays) (hereinafter
referred as ¡§the restricted hours¡¨), additional weekly impact monitoring for Leq(5min) measurement shall be
employed during respective restricted hours periods.. Supplementary information for data
auditing, statistical results such as L10 and L90 shall
also be obtained for reference.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.4.3
The water quality monitoring frequency shall
be 3 days per week during course of works.
The interval between two sets of monitoring shall not be less than 36
hours.
Air Quality Monitoring
3.5.1
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. If the ET proposes to use a direct
reading dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP levels, it shall submit sufficient
information to the IEC to approve.
3.5.2
The filter paper of
24-hour TSP measurement shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory.
3.5.3
All equipment to be used for air quality monitoring
is listed in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-Hr TSP |
|
High
Volume Air Sampler |
TISCH High Volume
Air Sampler, HVS Model TE-5170* |
Calibration
Kit |
TISCH Model
TE-5025A* |
1-Hour TSP |
|
Portable Dust Meter |
Sibata LD-3B
Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass Profiler & Counter* |
* Instrument was used in the Reporting
Period and the calibration certificate could be referred in Appendix F.
Wind Data Monitoring Equipment
3.5.4
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
wind data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging
wind speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location
shall be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
1)
The wind sensors should be installed 10 m
above ground so that they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by
buildings.
2)
The wind data should be captured by a data
logger. The data shall be downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
3)
The wind data monitoring equipment should be
re-calibrated at least once every six months.
4)
Wind direction should be divided into 16
sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
3.5.5
ET has liaised with the landlords of the
successful granted HVS installation premises. However, the owners rejected to provide
premises for wind data monitoring equipment installation.
3.5.6
Under this situation, the ET proposed
alternative methods to obtain representative wind data. Meteorological information as extracted
from ¡§the Hong Kong Observatory Ta Kwu Ling Station¡¨ is alternative method to
obtain representative wind data.
For Ta Kwu Ling Station, it is located nearby the Project site. Moreover, this station is located at 15m
above mean sea level while its anemometer is located at 13m above the existing
ground which in compliance with the general setting up requirement. Furthermore, this station also can be to
provide the humidity, rainfall, and air pressure and temperature etc.
meteorological information. In Hong
Kong of a lot development projects, weather information extracted from Hong
Kong Observatory is common alternative method if weather station installation
not allowed.
Noise Monitoring
3.5.7
Sound level meter in compliance with the
International Electrotechnical Commission
Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be
used for carrying out the noise monitoring. The sound level meter shall be checked
using an acoustic calibrator. The
wind speed shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of
measuring the wind speed in m/s.
3.5.8
Noise monitoring equipment to be used for
monitoring is listed in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6 Construction
Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
B&K Type 2238* or Rion
NL-31* or Rion
NL-52* |
Calibrator |
B&K Type 4231* or Quest QC-20* or Rion NC-74* |
Portable Wind Speed Indicator |
Testo Anemometer |
* Instrument was used in the Reporting
Period and the calibration certificate could be referred in Appendix F.
3.5.9
Sound level meters listed above comply with
the International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications, as recommended in TM issued
under the NCO. The acoustic
calibrator and sound level meter to be used in the impact monitoring will be
calibrated yearly.
Water Quality Monitoring
3.5.10
DO and water temperature should be measured
in-situ by a DO/temperature meter. The instrument should be portable and
weatherproof using a DC power source. It should have a membrane electrode with
automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. The equipment should
be capable of measuring:
•
a DO level
in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200% saturation; and
•
a
temperature of between 0 and 45 degree Celsius.
3.5.11
A portable pH meter capable of measuring a
range between 0.0 and 14.0 should be provided to measure pH under the specified
conditions accordingly to the APHA Standard Methods.
3.5.12
The instrument should be portable and
weatherproof using a DC power source. It should have a photoelectric sensor
capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU.
3.5.13
A portable, battery-operated echo sounder or
tape measure will be used for the determination of water depth at each
designated monitoring station as appropriate.
3.5.14
A water sampler e.g. Kahlsico
Water Sampler, which is a transparent PVC cylinder with capacity not less than
2 litres, will be used for water sampling if water
depth over than 0.5m. For
sampling from very shallow water depths e.g. <0.5 m, water sample collection
will be directly from water surface below 100mm use sampling plastic bottle to
avoid inclusion of bottom sediment or humus. Moreover, Teflon/stainless steel bailer
or self-made sampling buckets maybe used for water sampling. The equipment used for sampling will be
depended the sampling location and depth situations.
3.5.15
Water samples for laboratory measurement of
SS will be collected in high density polythene bottles, packed in ice (cooled
to 4 ºC without being frozen), and delivered to the laboratory in the same day
as the samples were collected.
3.5.16
Analysis of suspended solids should be
carried out in a HOKLAS or other accredited laboratory. Water samples of about
1L should be collected at the monitoring stations for carrying out the
laboratory suspended solids determination.
The SS determination work should start within 24 hours after collection
of the water samples. The SS analyses should follow the APHA Standard Methods 2540D with Limit of Reporting of 2 mg/L.
3.5.17
Water quality monitoring equipment used in
the impact monitoring is listed in Table 3-7. Suspended solids (SS)
analysis is carried out by a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory, namely ALS Technichem
(HK) Pty Ltd.
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Depth
Detector |
Eagle
Sonar or tape measures |
Water Sampler |
A 2-litre transparent PVC cylinder with latex cups at
both ends or teflon/stainless steel bailer or
self-made sampling bucket |
Thermometer & DO meter |
YSI Professional Plus /YSI PRO20 Handheld Dissolved
Oxygen Instrument/ YSI 550A Multifunctional Meter*/ YSI Professional DSS |
pH meter |
YSI Professional Plus / AZ8685 pH pen-style meter*/ YSI
6820/ 650MDS/ YSI Professional DSS |
Turbidimeter |
Hach 2100Q*/ YSI 6820/
650MDS/ YSI Professional DSS |
Sample Container |
High density polythene bottles (provided by laboratory) |
Storage
Container |
¡¥Willow¡¦
33-liter plastic cool box with Ice pad |
* Instrument was used in the Reporting
Period and the calibration certificate could be referred in Appendix F.
1-hour TSP
Monitoring
3.6.1
The 1-hour TSP monitor was a brand named ¡§Sibata LD-3B Laser Dust monitor Particle Mass Profiler
& Counter¡¨ which is a portable, battery-operated laser photometer. The 1-hour TSP meter provides a real
time 1-hour TSP measurement based on 90o light scattering. The 1-hour TSP monitor consists of the
following:
(a.)
A pump to draw sample aerosol through the optic
chamber where TSP is measured;
(b.)
A sheath air system to isolate the aerosol in
the chamber to keep the optics clean for maximum reliability; and
(c.)
A built-in data logger compatible with
Windows based program to facilitate data collection, analysis and reporting.
3.6.2
The 1-hour TSP meter is used within the valid
period as follow manufacturer¡¦s Operation and Service Manual.
3.6.3
The equipment used for 24-hour TSP
measurement is Tisch Environmental, Inc. Model TE-5170 TSP
high volume air sampling system, which complied with EPA Code of Federal Regulation, Appendix B to Part 50. The High
Volume Air Sampler (HVS) consists of the following:
(a.)
An anodized aluminum shelter;
(b.)
A 8¡¨x10¡¨ stainless steel filter holder;
(c.)
A blower motor assembly;
(d.)
A continuous flow/pressure recorder;
(e.)
A motor speed-voltage control/elapsed time
indicator;
(f.)
A 7-day mechanical timer, and
(g.)
A power supply of 220v/50 Hz
3.6.4
The HVS is operated and calibrated on a
regular basis in accordance with the manufacturer¡¦s instruction using Tisch Calibration Kit Model TE-5025A. Calibration would carry out in two month
interval.
3.6.5
24-hour TSP is collected by the ET on filters
of HVS and quantified by a local HOKLAS accredited laboratory, ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd (ALS), upon receipt of the samples. The ET keep all the sampled 24-hour TSP
filters in normal air conditioned room conditions, i.e. 70% RH (Relative
Humidity) and 25oC, for six months prior to disposal.
3.6.6
Noise measurements were taken in terms of the
A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level (Leq)
measured in decibels dB(A). Supplementary statistical
results (L10 and L90) were also obtained for reference.
3.6.7
During the monitoring, all noise measurements
would be performed with the meter set to FAST response and on the A-weighted
equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq). Leq(30min)
in six consecutive Leq(5min) measurements
will use as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700-1900
hours on weekdays; Leq(5min) measurements
would be used as monitoring parameter for other time periods (e.g. during
restricted hours), if necessary.
3.6.8
Prior of noise measurement, the accuracy of
the sound level meter is checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a
known sound pressure level at a known frequency. The checking is performed before and
after the noise measurement.
Water
Quality
3.6.9
Water quality monitoring is conducted at the
designated or alternative locations. The sampling procedures with the in-situ
monitoring are presented as below:
Sampling Procedure
3.6.10
A Digital Global
Positioning System (GPS) is used to identify the designated monitoring stations
prior to water sampling. A
portable, battery-operated echo sounder or tape measurement is used for the
determination of water depth at each station. At each station, water sample would be
collected from 0.1m below water surface or the water surface to prevent the
river bed sediment for stirring.
3.6.11
If the water level of a
monitoring station is too shallow when sampling, sediment would be disturbed
which affecting the accuracy of water quality monitoring. In order to avoid disturbing sediment,
depth limits should be set up for the water sampling for the ease of
reference. When the measured water
depth of the monitoring station (both control and impact stations) is lower
than 150mm, water monitoring would not be to perform at that monitoring
location. Instead, the monitoring
location will be moved to a temporary alternative location monitoring location
based on the criteria below:-
(a) the alternative location should be either
upstream or downstream of the original location and at the same the
river/drain channel
(b) the alternative location should be within 15m far from the original location
(c) if no suitable alternative location could be
found within 15m far from the original
location, the sampling at that location will be cancelled since sampling at too
far from the designated location could not make a representative sample.
3.6.12
The sample container will be rinsed with a
portion of the water sample. The
water sample then will be transferred to the high-density polythene bottles as provided by the laboratory,
labeled with a unique sample number and sealed with a screw cap.
3.6.13
Before sampling, general information such as
the date and time of sampling, weather condition as well as the personnel
responsible for the monitoring would be recorded on the field data sheet.
3.6.14
A ¡¥Willow¡¦ 33-liter plastic cool box packed
with ice will be used to preserve the water samples prior to arrival at the
laboratory for chemical determination.
The water temperature of the cool box is maintained at a temperature as
close to 40C as possible without being frozen. Samples collected are delivered to the
laboratory upon collection.
In-situ Measurement
3.6.15
YSI PRO20 Handheld Dissolved Oxygen
Instrument is used for water in-situ
measures, which automates the measurements and data logging of
temperature, dissolved oxygen and dissolved oxygen saturation.
3.6.16
A portable AZ Model 8685 is used for in-situ
pH measurement. The pH meter is
capable of measuring pH in the range of 0 ¡V 14 and readable to 0.1.
3.6.17
A portable Hach
2100Q Turbidimeter is used for in-situ turbidity
measurement. The turbidity meter is capable of measuring turbidity in the range
of 0 ¡V 1000 NTU.
3.6.18
All in-situ measurement equipment are
calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month interval.
Laboratory Analysis
3.6.19
All water samples analyzed Suspended Solids
(SS) will be carried out by a local HOKLAS-accredited testing laboratory (ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd HOKLAS registration no. 66). SS determination using APHA
Standard Methods 2540D as specified in the EM&A Manual will start within
48 hours of water sample receipt.
3.7.1
Calibration of the HVS is performed upon
installation and thereafter at bimonthly intervals in accordance with the
manufacturer¡¦s instruction using the certified standard calibrator (TISCH Model
TE-5025A).
Moreover, the Calibration Kit would be calibrated annually. The calibration data are properly
documented and the records are maintained by ET for future reference.
3.7.2
The 1-hour TSP
meter was calibrated by the supplier prior to purchase. Zero response of the equipment would be
checked before and after each monitoring event. Annually calibration with the High
Volume Sampler (HVS) in same condition would be undertaken by the Laboratory.
3.7.3
The sound level
meter and calibrator are calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited
under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme at yearly basis.
3.7.4
All water quality monitoring equipment would
be calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month intervals.
3.7.5
The calibration
certificates of all monitoring equipment used for the impact monitoring program
in the Reporting Period and the HOKLAS accredited certificate of laboratory are attached in Appendix F.
3.8.1
The baseline results form the basis for
determining the environmental acceptance criteria for the impact
monitoring. According to the
approved Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual, the air quality, construction
noise and water quality criteria were set up, namely Action and Limit levels
are listed in Tables 3-8, 3-9 and 3-10.
Table 3-8 Action and
Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Monitoring
Station |
Action Level (mg /m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
||
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
|
AM1b |
265 |
143 |
500 |
260 |
AM2 |
268 |
149 |
||
AM3 |
269 |
145 |
||
AM4b |
267 |
148 |
||
AM5a |
268 |
143 |
||
AM6 |
269 |
148 |
||
AM7b |
275 |
156 |
||
AM8 |
269 |
144 |
||
AM9b |
271 |
151 |
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Monitoring Location |
Action Level |
Limit Level in
dB(A) |
Time Period:
0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays |
||
NM1, NM2a, NM3,
NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8, NM9, NM10 |
When one
or more documented complaints are received |
75 dB(A)Note 1
& Note 2 |
Note 1: Acceptable Noise Levels
for school should be reduced to 70 dB(A)
and65 dB(A) during examination period.
Note 2: If works are to be
carried out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the NCA have to be followed.
Table 3-10 Action and
Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameter |
Performance
criteria |
Monitoring Location |
|||||
WM1 |
WM2A(a) |
WM2B |
WM3x |
WM4 |
|||
DO (mg/L) |
Action Level |
(*)4.23 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.74 |
(**)4.00 |
(*)4.14 |
|
Limit Level |
(#)4.19 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.60 |
(**)4.00 |
(#)4.08 |
||
Turbidity (NTU) |
Action Level |
51.3 |
24.9 |
11.4 |
13.4 |
35.2 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of
the same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
67.6 |
33.8 |
12.3 |
14.0 |
38.4 |
||
AND 130% of upstream control station of the same day |
|||||||
SS (mg/L) |
Action Level |
54.5 |
14.6 |
11.8 |
12.6 |
39.4 |
|
AND 120% of upstream control station of the
same day |
|||||||
Limit Level |
64.9 |
17.3 |
12.4 |
12.9 |
45.5 |
||
AND 130% of upstream control station of the same day |
|||||||
Remarks: (*) The
Proposed Action Level of Dissolved
Oxygen is adopted to be used 5%-ile of
baseline data (**) The
Proposed Action & Limit Level of Dissolved
Oxygen is used 4mg/L (#) The
Proposed Limit Level of Dissolved
Oxygen is adopted to be used 1%-ile of
baseline data |
|||||||
3.8.2
Should non-compliance of the environmental
quality criteria occurs, remedial actions will be triggered according to the
Event and Action Plan which presented in Appendix G.
3.9.1
All monitoring data will be handled by the ET¡¦s in-house data recording and management system. The monitoring data
recorded in the equipment will be downloaded directly from the equipment at the
end of each monitoring day. The
downloaded monitoring data will input into a computerized database maintained
by the ET. The laboratory results
will be input directly into the computerized database and checked by personnel
other than those who input the data.
3.9.2
For monitoring parameters that require
laboratory analysis, the local laboratory shall follow the QA/QC requirements
as set out under the HOKLAS scheme for the relevant laboratory tests.
4.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and
Contract SS C505. Hence, air quality monitoring was performed at all designated
locations.
4.1.2
The air quality monitoring schedule is
presented in Appendix H and the monitoring results are summarized in the
following sub-sections.
4.2.1
In the Reporting Period, a total of 135 events of 1-hour TSP and 50 events 24-hours TSP monitoring were carried
out and the monitoring results are summarized in Tables 4-1 to 4-9. The detailed 24-hour TSP
monitoring data are presented in Appendix I and the relevant
graphical plots are shown in Appendix J.
Table 4-1 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM1b
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
6-Mar-18 |
75
|
5-Mar-18 |
9:26 |
55 |
63 |
67 |
12-Mar-18 |
72
|
10-Mar-18 |
8:47 |
54 |
52 |
60 |
17-Mar-18 |
68
|
16-Mar-18 |
9:06 |
66 |
69 |
66 |
23-Mar-18 |
69
|
22-Mar-18 |
10:24 |
64 |
67 |
66 |
29-Mar-18 |
67
|
28-Mar-18 |
10:04 |
80 |
79 |
77 |
Average (Range) |
70 (67 ¡V 75) |
Average (Range) |
66 (52 ¡V 80) |
Table 4-2 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM2
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
6-Mar-18 |
147
|
5-Mar-18 |
9:30 |
56 |
61 |
66 |
12-Mar-18 |
142
|
10-Mar-18 |
8:52 |
63 |
60 |
66 |
17-Mar-18 |
125
|
16-Mar-18 |
9:11 |
70 |
71 |
72 |
23-Mar-18 |
143
|
22-Mar-18 |
10:01 |
61 |
59 |
60 |
29-Mar-18 |
144
|
28-Mar-18 |
9:15 |
75 |
79 |
77 |
Average (Range) |
140 (125 ¡V 147) |
Average (Range) |
66 (56 ¡V 79) |
Table 4-3 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM3
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
6-Mar-18 |
56
|
5-Mar-18 |
9:33 |
54 |
57 |
63 |
12-Mar-18 |
69
|
10-Mar-18 |
8:57 |
50 |
48 |
55 |
17-Mar-18 |
55
|
16-Mar-18 |
9:13 |
68 |
67 |
70 |
23-Mar-18 |
100
|
22-Mar-18 |
13:11 |
64 |
63 |
63 |
29-Mar-18 |
79
|
28-Mar-18 |
13:03 |
73 |
76 |
73 |
Average (Range) |
72 (55 ¡V 100) |
Average (Range) |
63 (48 ¡V 76) |
Table 4-4 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM4b
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
1-Mar-18 |
70
|
3-Mar-18 |
8:52 |
63 |
61 |
68 |
7-Mar-18 |
92
|
9-Mar-18 |
9:32 |
36 |
37 |
41 |
13-Mar-18 |
58
|
15-Mar-18 |
9:38 |
40 |
46 |
52 |
19-Mar-18 |
65
|
20-Mar-18 |
10:47 |
53 |
54 |
52 |
24-Mar-18 |
88
|
26-Mar-18 |
9:52 |
73 |
70 |
65 |
30-Mar-18 |
73
|
|
||||
Average (Range) |
74 (58 ¡V 92) |
Average (Range) |
54 (36 ¡V 73) |
Table 4-5 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM5a
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
1-Mar-18 |
48
|
3-Mar-18 |
8:54 |
65 |
62 |
66 |
7-Mar-18 |
75
|
9-Mar-18 |
9:29 |
33 |
34 |
39 |
13-Mar-18 |
75
|
15-Mar-18 |
9:36 |
43 |
50 |
56 |
19-Mar-18 |
43
|
20-Mar-18 |
10:03 |
50 |
48 |
51 |
24-Mar-18 |
99
|
26-Mar-18 |
9:50 |
65 |
68 |
66 |
30-Mar-18 |
50
|
|
||||
Average (Range) |
65 (43 ¡V 99) |
Average (Range) |
53 (33 ¡V 68) |
|
|
Table 4-6 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM6
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
1-Mar-18 |
103
|
3-Mar-18 |
9:07 |
63 |
60 |
64 |
7-Mar-18 |
76
|
9-Mar-18 |
9:23 |
36 |
39 |
42 |
13-Mar-18 |
83
|
15-Mar-18 |
9:28 |
50 |
52 |
59 |
19-Mar-18 |
123
|
20-Mar-18 |
13:09 |
42 |
54 |
50 |
24-Mar-18 |
119
|
26-Mar-18 |
9:45 |
59 |
67 |
81 |
30-Mar-18 |
88
|
|
||||
Average (Range) |
99 (76 ¡V 123) |
Average (Range) |
55 (36 ¡V 81) |
|
|
Table 4-7 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM7b
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
1-Mar-18 |
92
|
3-Mar-18 |
9:12 |
65 |
58 |
62 |
7-Mar-18 |
103
|
9-Mar-18 |
9:03 |
44 |
46 |
47 |
13-Mar-18 |
87
|
15-Mar-18 |
9:23 |
47 |
51 |
56 |
19-Mar-18 |
106
|
20-Mar-18 |
9:23 |
78 |
78 |
82 |
24-Mar-18 |
151
|
26-Mar-18 |
9:33 |
53 |
59 |
63 |
30-Mar-18 |
119
|
|
||||
Average (Range) |
110 (87 ¡V 151) |
Average (Range) |
59 (44 ¡V 82) |
Table 4-8 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM8
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
1-Mar-18 |
45
|
3-Mar-18 |
13:32 |
65 |
78 |
68 |
7-Mar-18 |
24
|
9-Mar-18 |
13:16 |
41 |
45 |
45 |
13-Mar-18 |
51
|
15-Mar-18 |
9:12 |
50 |
53 |
60 |
19-Mar-18 |
59
|
20-Mar-18 |
13:18 |
77 |
79 |
77 |
24-Mar-18 |
83
|
26-Mar-18 |
9:16 |
54 |
60 |
63 |
30-Mar-18 |
58
|
|
||||
Average (Range) |
53 (24 ¡V 83) |
Average (Range) |
61 (41 ¡V 79) |
Table 4-9 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results ¡V AM9b
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st
reading |
2nd
reading |
3rd
reading |
||
6-Mar-18 |
57
|
5-Mar-18 |
10:14 |
58 |
57 |
64 |
12-Mar-18 |
48
|
10-Mar-18 |
9:18 |
41 |
43 |
48 |
17-Mar-18 |
114
|
16-Mar-18 |
9:35 |
49 |
52 |
59 |
23-Mar-18 |
104
|
22-Mar-18 |
9:24 |
85 |
88 |
71 |
29-Mar-18 |
79
|
28-Mar-18 |
9:06 |
63 |
62 |
62 |
Average (Range) |
80 (48 ¡V 114) |
Average (Range) |
60 (41 ¡V 88) |
4.2.2
As shown in Tables 4-1 to 4-9, all
the 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP
monitoring results were below the Action/Limit Levels. No Notification of Exceedance (NOE) was
issued in this Reporting Period.
4.2.3
The meteorological data during the impact
monitoring days are summarized in Appendix K.
5.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project have been commenced in Contracts
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and
Contract SS C505 and noise monitoring was performed at all designated
locations.
5.1.2
The noise monitoring schedule is presented in
Appendix
H and the monitoring results are summarized in the following
sub-sections.
5.2.1
In the Reporting Period, a total of 45 events noise measurements were carried out at the
designated locations. The sound
level meter was set in 1m from the exterior of the building façade including
noise monitoring locations NM1, NM3, NM4, NM5, NM6, NM7, NM8 and NM9. Therefore, no façade correction (+3 dB(A)) is added according to acoustical principles and EPD
guidelines. However, free-field
status were performed at NM2a and NM10 and façade correction (+3 dB(A)) has added according to the requirement in this
month. The noise monitoring results
at the designated locations are summarized in Tables 5-1 and 5-2. The detailed noise monitoring
data are presented in Appendix I and the relevant
graphical plots are shown in Appendix J.
Table 5-1 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Construction Noise Level (Leq30min), dB(A) |
|||||
Date |
NM1 |
NM2a(*) |
NM8 |
NM9 |
NM10(*) |
5-Mar-18 |
60
|
70 |
63 |
65 |
69 |
16-Mar-18 |
61
|
68 |
62 |
63 |
66 |
22-Mar-18 |
58
|
72 |
56 |
58 |
59 |
28-Mar-18 |
51
|
68 |
59 |
61 |
61 |
Limit Level |
75 dB(A) |
Remarks
(*) façade
correction (+3 dB(A) is added according to acoustical
principles and EPD guidelines
Table 5-2 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results
Construction Noise Level (Leq30min), dB(A) |
|
|||||||
Date |
NM3 |
NM4 |
NM5 |
NM6 |
NM7 |
|
||
9-Mar-18 |
61
|
65
|
52
|
57 |
59 |
|
||
15-Mar-18 |
59
|
65
|
58
|
61 |
61 |
|
||
20-Mar-18 |
55
|
63
|
57
|
61 |
64 |
|
||
26-Mar-18 |
63
|
61
|
51
|
59 |
65 |
|
||
29-Mar-18 |
55
|
62
|
53
|
57 |
58 |
|
||
Limit Level |
75 dB(A) |
|
|
54 |
5.2.2
As shown in Tables
5-1 and 5-2, no
construction noise measurement results that exceeded the Limit Level were
recorded. Moreover, no valid noise complaint (which triggered Action Level
exceedance) was recorded in the Reporting Period.
6.1.1
In the Reporting Period, construction works under the
project has been commenced in Contracts
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and
Contract SS C505 and water quality monitoring was performed at all designated
locations. The water quality
monitoring schedule is presented in Appendix H. The monitoring results are summarized in
the following sub-sections.
6.2.1
In the Reporting Period, a total of fourteen (14) sampling days was scheduled to carry out for all designated locations
with their control stations. Since exceedances were recorded at WM3x, according to ¡§Event and Action Plan¡¨ stipulation, 2 additional water quality monitoring day were conducted for WM3x and its control stations.
6.2.2
The key monitoring parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Turbidity and Suspended
Solids are summarized in Tables 6-1 to 6-5. Breaches of water quality monitoring
criteria are shown in Table 6-6. Detailed monitoring database including
in-situ measurements and laboratory analysis data are shown in Appendix
I and the relevant graphical plot are shown in Appendix J.
Table 6-1 Water
Quality Monitoring Results Associated of Contracts 2 and 3
Date |
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
||||||
WM4 |
WM4-CA |
WM4-CB |
WM4 |
WM4-CA |
WM4-CB |
WM4 |
WM4-CA |
WM4-CB |
|
1-Mar-18 |
6.0 |
8.7 |
6.3 |
6.7 |
2.4 |
6.0 |
10.5 |
2.5 |
6.0 |
3-Mar-18 |
6.1 |
8.7 |
6.2 |
8.3 |
2.2 |
8.4 |
18.0 |
4.5 |
8.0 |
5-Mar-18 |
5.7 |
7.8 |
5.8 |
12.0 |
3.4 |
6.5 |
13.0 |
<2 |
9.0 |
7-Mar-18 |
5.6 |
6.8 |
5.0 |
13.1 |
2.9 |
10.1 |
12.0 |
<2 |
13.5 |
9-Mar-18 |
6.8 |
9.2 |
6.9 |
15.6 |
2.3 |
11.9 |
9.0 |
<2 |
11.5 |
12-Mar-18 |
5.6 |
7.3 |
5.2 |
15.6 |
3.4 |
10.2 |
15.0 |
3.5 |
11.0 |
14-Mar-18 |
5.6 |
6.2 |
4.3 |
10.5 |
7.0 |
9.2 |
9.5 |
3.0 |
9.5 |
16-Mar-18 |
5.8 |
7.0 |
5.7 |
13.8 |
5.3 |
5.2 |
26.0 |
2.5 |
4.0 |
19-Mar-18 |
9.7 |
9.1 |
7.7 |
25.7 |
2.5 |
5.6 |
37.0 |
3.0 |
7.5 |
21-Mar-18 |
7.9 |
8.9 |
8.4 |
15.1 |
1.7 |
9.0 |
22.0 |
<2 |
5.5 |
23-Mar-18 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
7.5 |
32.1 |
4.3 |
8.5 |
31.5 |
5.0 |
13.0 |
27-Mar-18 |
4.7 |
7.1 |
5.3 |
21.6 |
4.7 |
6.4 |
19.5 |
5.0 |
4.5 |
29-Mar-18 |
5.2 |
6.8 |
5.1 |
17.7 |
6.3 |
11.2 |
18.5 |
3.5 |
8.5 |
31-Mar-18 |
6.0 |
7.4 |
6.8 |
14.8 |
4.9 |
7.7 |
17.5 |
2.0 |
7.0 |
Table 6-2 Water
Quality Monitoring Results Associated of Contracts 6 and SS C505
Date |
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
|||
WM1 |
WM1-C |
WM1 |
WM1-C |
WM1 |
WM1-C |
|
1-Mar-18 |
7.0 |
13.9 |
7.9 |
8.1 |
7.0 |
3.5 |
3-Mar-18 |
5.8 |
13.5 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
14.0 |
6.5 |
5-Mar-18 |
5.5 |
12.4 |
10.9 |
8.1 |
13.5 |
2.5 |
7-Mar-18 |
6.3 |
11.7 |
14.2 |
9.2 |
16.0 |
2.5 |
9-Mar-18 |
8.8 |
12.7 |
28.3 |
8.5 |
21.0 |
3.0 |
12-Mar-18 |
5.7 |
10.2 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
14-Mar-18 |
6.7 |
10.5 |
23.5 |
11.5 |
16.0 |
8.5 |
16-Mar-18 |
4.4 |
9.8 |
26.3 |
26.6 |
13.5 |
19.5 |
19-Mar-18 |
7.6 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
18.7 |
17.5 |
16.0 |
21-Mar-18 |
8.4 |
8.9 |
25.5 |
13.9 |
17.0 |
15.0 |
23-Mar-18 |
10.8 |
8.6 |
29.3 |
28.3 |
24.5 |
53.0 |
27-Mar-18 |
4.5 |
9.5 |
5.4 |
8.2 |
3.5 |
10.0 |
29-Mar-18 |
5.3 |
11.5 |
8.5 |
9.3 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
31-Mar-18 |
6.5 |
8.3 |
8.2 |
12.2 |
6.0 |
12.0 |
Table 6-3 Water
Quality Monitoring Results Associated only Contract 6
Date |
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
|||||||||
WM2A(a) |
WM2A- Cx |
WM2B |
WM2B- C |
WM2A(a) |
WM2A- Cx |
WM2B |
WM2B- C |
WM2A(a) |
WM2A- Cx |
WM2B |
WM2B- C |
|
1-Mar-18 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
* |
* |
4.6 |
13.5 |
* |
* |
2.0 |
4.5 |
* |
* |
3-Mar-18 |
7.5 |
7.8 |
* |
* |
7.9 |
14.5 |
* |
* |
3.5 |
7.0 |
* |
* |
5-Mar-18 |
7.2 |
7.4 |
* |
* |
6.2 |
18.9 |
* |
* |
7.5 |
10.5 |
* |
* |
7-Mar-18 |
6.9 |
6.6 |
* |
* |
7.3 |
16.8 |
* |
* |
3.0 |
5.0 |
* |
* |
9-Mar-18 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
* |
* |
5.0 |
79.9 |
* |
* |
<2 |
34.5 |
* |
* |
12-Mar-18 |
7.1 |
7.3 |
* |
* |
5.7 |
8.8 |
* |
* |
2.5 |
3.5 |
* |
* |
14-Mar-18 |
7.7 |
7.1 |
* |
* |
20.7 |
22.3 |
* |
* |
11.5 |
10.5 |
* |
* |
16-Mar-18 |
6.7 |
6.0 |
* |
* |
18.3 |
21.4 |
* |
* |
11.5 |
6.0 |
* |
* |
19-Mar-18 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
* |
* |
7.4 |
9.5 |
* |
* |
11.0 |
17.0 |
* |
* |
21-Mar-18 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
* |
* |
13.3 |
21.8 |
* |
* |
11.0 |
44.5 |
* |
* |
23-Mar-18 |
9.5 |
8.6 |
* |
* |
25.3 |
21.9 |
* |
* |
11.0 |
22.0 |
* |
* |
27-Mar-18 |
7.7 |
6.1 |
* |
* |
9.7 |
19.8 |
* |
* |
6.5 |
9.5 |
* |
* |
29-Mar-18 |
7.5 |
5.9 |
* |
* |
12.1 |
14.8 |
* |
* |
7.0 |
6.5 |
* |
* |
31-Mar-18 |
7.5 |
9.3 |
* |
* |
10.4 |
16.0 |
* |
* |
13.0 |
3.5 |
* |
* |
Remarks: * water sampling was unable to carry out at WM2B
and WM2B-C due to shallow water (water depth under 150mm |
Table 6-4 Water
Quality Monitoring Results Associated Contracts 2 and 6
Date |
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
|||
WM3x |
WM3-C |
WM3x |
WM3-C |
WM3x |
WM3-C |
|
1-Mar-18 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
24.5 |
1.6 |
39.5 |
3.5 |
2-Mar-18 |
# |
# |
4.2 |
2.9 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
3-Mar-18 |
7.5 |
8.3 |
119.0 |
3.5 |
185.0 |
7.5 |
5-Mar-18 |
8.2 |
8.0 |
13.2 |
2.3 |
11.0 |
3.5 |
6-Mar-18 |
# |
# |
4.1 |
1.7 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
7-Mar-18 |
8.1 |
8.3 |
9.5 |
7.1 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
9-Mar-18 |
6.6 |
9.4 |
6.6 |
3.6 |
6.0 |
7.0 |
12-Mar-18 |
7.7 |
8.0 |
5.3 |
2.7 |
4.5 |
2.5 |
14-Mar-18 |
6.7 |
7.4 |
9.4 |
6.6 |
7.5 |
19.0 |
16-Mar-18 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
4.5 |
3.0 |
<2 |
<2 |
19-Mar-18 |
8.4 |
8.2 |
5.9 |
9.6 |
3.5 |
9.5 |
21-Mar-18 |
9.0 |
8.8 |
9.4 |
5.3 |
<2 |
6.0 |
23-Mar-18 |
8.7 |
8.3 |
4.9 |
5.8 |
7.0 |
5.5 |
27-Mar-18 |
6.1 |
10.9 |
7.3 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
12.5 |
29-Mar-18 |
6.2 |
7.1 |
23.0 |
62.1 |
12.5 |
134.0 |
31-Mar-18 |
7.3 |
7.1 |
9.7 |
10.9 |
10.0 |
11.0 |
Remarks: |
|
# Additional water quality monitoring at the exceeded
location(s) due to two consecutive monitoring days indicated Limit Level exceedance. bold with underline indicated Limit Level
exceedance |
Table 6-5 Action
and Limit (A/L) Levels Exceedance Recorded
Location |
Dissolved Oxygen |
Turbidity |
Suspended Solids |
Total Exceedance |
Project Related
exceedance |
|||||
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
AL |
LL |
|
WM1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
WM2A(a) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
WM2B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
WM3x |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
WM4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No of Exceedance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
6.2.3
In this Reporting Period, a total of four (4) Limit Level exceedances, namely two (2) Limit Level exceedance of turbidity and two (2) Limit Level
exceedances of Suspended Solids were recorded for the Project and they are
summarized in Table 6-5. Investigation
Reports for all water quality exceedances were completed by ET. Investigation results revealed that the
Contractor had properly implemented water quality mitigation measures such as well-maintained
the wastewater treatment facility and covered the expose area with impervious
sheet. It was concluded that the exceedances
recorded at WM3x were not caused by the works under the Project.
6.2.4
NOE was issued to relevant parties upon
confirmation of the monitoring result.
The investigation results and summary of exceedances are summarized in Table
6-6. The details of the
completed investigation reports for the exceedances are attached in Appendix
N.
Table 6-6 Summary
of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Date of Exceedance |
Location |
Exceeded Parameter |
Cause of Water Quality Exceedance In Brief |
1 and 3
March 2018 |
WM3x |
NTU
& SS |
Upon detection of the exceedances,
inspection was carried out at the channel adjacent to related site areas of
Contract 2 and Contract 6, no deteriorated water quality was observed from
both Sites. Moreover, weekly site inspection revealed that both Contractors
had properly implemented water quality mitigation measures and no adverse water
quality impact was recorded. It is considered
that the exceedances were related to other
source of turbid water, possibly from storm water of Sha Tau Kok
Road or adjacent villages and not caused by the
works under the Project. |
7.1.1
Ecology monitoring for woodland
compensation was shall be conducted at bi-monthly interval for the first year and the monitoring
frequency would be reduced to quarterly from the second year.
7.1.2
The Ecology Monitoring for period of December 2017
to February 2018 was carried out on 8th and 22nd January
2018 by transects inspection and quadrat monitoring. Therefore, the Quarterly Ecological
Monitoring Report (Dec 2017 - Feb 2018) was submitted to EPD in March 2018 as standalone
as supplementary of the EM&A Report.
8.1.1
Waste management was carried out in
accordance with the Waste Management Plan (WMP) for each contract.
8.2.1
All types of waste arising from the
construction work are classified into the following:
l Construction
& Demolition (C&D) Material;
l Chemical
Waste;
l General
Refuse; and
l Excavated
Soil.
8.2.2
The quantities of waste for disposal in this
Reporting Period are summarized in Tables 8-1 and 8-2 and the Monthly
Summary Waste Flow Table is shown in Appendix L. Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable.
Table 8-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials for the Project
Type of Waste |
Contract 2 |
Contract 3 |
Contract 4 |
Contract 6 |
Contract 7 |
Contract SS C505 |
Total Qty. |
||||||
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
||
C&D Materials (Inert) (in '000m3) |
39.6460 |
-- |
1.524 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
3.269 |
-- |
0.005 |
-- |
11.241 |
-- |
55.685 |
Reused in this Contract (Inert) (in '000 m3) |
0 |
-- |
0.120 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
1.581 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
0.225 |
-- |
1.926 |
Reused in other Contracts/ Projects (Inert) (in '000 m3) |
3.3460 |
Recycling facility as approved alternative site |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
0.969 |
NENT |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
4.315 |
Disposal as Public Fill (Inert) (in '000 m3) |
36.3000 |
Tuen Mun 38 |
1.263 |
Tuen Mun 38 |
0 |
-- |
0.719 |
Tuen Mun 38 |
0.005 |
Tuen Mun 38 |
10.186 |
TKO 137 |
48.473 |
Table 8-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes for the Project
Type of Waste |
Contract 2 |
Contract 3 |
Contract 4 |
Contract 6 |
Contract 7 |
Contract SS C505 |
Total Quantity |
||||||
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
Qty. |
Disposal location |
||
Recycled Metal (¡¥000kg) # |
36.000 |
Licensed collector |
0 |
- |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
6 |
Licensed collector |
220.860 |
Licensed collector |
262.86 |
Recycled
Paper / Cardboard Packing (¡¥000kg) # |
0.3050 |
Licensed collector |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0.380 |
Licensed collector |
0.15 |
Licensed collector |
0.830 |
Licensed collector |
1.665 |
Recycled Plastic (¡¥000kg) # |
2.7000 |
Licensed collector |
0 |
- |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
0.001 |
Licensed collector |
0.005 |
Licensed collector |
2.706 |
Chemical Wastes (¡¥000kg) # |
9.9040 |
Licensed collector |
0 |
- |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
9.904 |
General Refuses (¡¥000m3) |
0.6290 |
NENT |
0.085 |
NENT |
0 |
-- |
0.725 |
NENT |
0.2 |
NENT |
2.711 |
NENT |
4.35 |
Remark #: Unit of recycled metal, recycled paper/ cardboard packing,
recycled plastic and chemical waste for Contract 3 was in (¡¥000m3).
9.1.1
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
the environmental site inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Weekly environmental site inspections should
carry out to confirm the environmental performance.
Contract 2
9.2.1
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract 2 to evaluate the site environmental performance has
been carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on
1, 9, 16, 23 and 28 March 2018.
No non-compliance was noted.
9.2.2
The findings / deficiencies of Contract
2 that observed during the weekly site inspection are listed in Table
9-1.
Table 9-1 Site
Observations for Contract 2
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
1 March 2018 |
No adverse
environmental issue was observed. |
NA |
9 March 2018 |
Wheel washing
facility was observed out of work. The Contractor was advised to provide
proper mitigation for wheel washing. (Mid-Vent) |
Wheel washing
was provided at site entrance. |
The Contractor
was reminded to keep all pH record properly. |
Not required
for reminder. |
|
16 March 2018 |
Mud trails were
observed at site entrance. The Contractor was advised to clean it to avoid
dust emission. (Mid-Vent) Accumulation of construction and general waste were observed
mixed together. The Contractor was advised to perform on-site sorting and
dispose waste regularly. (Mid-Vent) The Contractor
was reminded to ensure all pH value of discharge water comply with WPCO
standard. |
Each vehicle is
wheel washed before leaving the MVP site and no mud trial was found at the
site entrance. General refuses
are segregated from the C&D wastes. Not required
for reminder. |
23 March 2018 |
General refuse cumulated
inside the storage pit was observed. General refuse cumulated inside the pit
should be cleaned. (North Portal) Mud and
sediment cumulated inside the store basin should be cleaned. (North Portal) Heavy smoke
emitted from cherry picker was observed. Proper maintenance should be
provided to maintain plants using on-site are in good condition. (North
Portal) |
General refuses
have been removed. The mud and
sediment accumulated at
the bottom of the basin has been removed. |
28 March 2018 |
Dry haul road
was observed, the Contractor should provide water spraying to minimize dust
generation from the haul road. (South Portal) Dirt and debris
on pedestrian road at the site exit was observed. The Contractor should clean
up the dusty material and maintain cleanliness. (Admin Building) |
The Contractor
will continue to provide water spraying to minimize dust generation from the
haul road. The dirt and
debris have been removed. |
Contract 3
9.2.3
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract 3 to evaluate the site environmental performance has
been carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on 1, 8, 15, 21 and
29 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted.
9.2.4
The findings / deficiencies of Contract
3 that observed during the weekly site inspection are listed in Table
9-2.
Table 9-2 Site
Observations for Contract 3
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
1 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was observed. |
NA |
8 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor was reminded to maintain the sandbag bund at ID4. |
Not required for reminder. |
15 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was observed. |
NA |
21 Mar 2018 |
Water dripping form the viaduct was observed, the Contractor should
properly remove any stagnant water on the viaduct after rain. (Tai Wo Service
Road East) Excavation next to the channel was observed, the Contractor should
provide mitigation measures to prevent muddy runoff entering the river
channel. The Contractor was reminded to provide dust suppression measure during
dry season. |
Concrete bund was provided to prevent water leaking from the viaduct. The exposed slopes are covered with tarpaulin sheets to avoid muddy
runoff entering the river channel. Not required for reminder. |
29 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor was reminded to improve and maintain the setup of water
diversion at BC02. |
Not required for reminder. |
Contract 4
9.2.5
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract 4 to
evaluate the site environmental performance has been carried out by the RE,
IEC, ET and the Contractor on 2, 9, 16, 19 and 28 March 2018. No non-compliance was
noted.
9.2.6
The findings / deficiencies of Contract
4 that
observed during the weekly site inspection are listed in Table 9-3.
Table 9-3 Site
Observations for Contract 4
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
2 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was
observed. |
NA |
9 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was
observed. |
NA |
16 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was
observed. |
NA |
19 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was
observed. |
NA |
28 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was
observed. |
NA |
Contract 6
9.2.7
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract 6 to evaluate the site environmental performance has
been carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on 2, 8, 15, 22 and
29 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted.
9.2.8
The findings / deficiencies of Contract
6 that observed during the weekly site inspection are listed in Table
9-4.
Table 9-4 Site
Observations for Contract 6
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
2 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor
was reminded to maintain the cleanliness at site exit and public footpath at
Gate 1 and Gate 2. |
Not required
for reminder. |
8 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor
was reminded at maintain the cleanliness at site exit in Gate 1. |
Not required
for reminder. |
15 Mar 2018 |
Dirt and debris
on pedestrian road were observed at Gate 1, the Contractor should maintain
the cleanliness at the pedestrian road and ensure no surface runoff entering
the public area from the site. The Contractor
was reminded to maintain and clean the U-channel for water diversion.
(Location: D08) |
The pedestrian
road is maintained clean and tidy. Not required
for reminder. |
22 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor
was reminded to maintain cleanliness at site exit and public area. |
Not required
for reminder. |
29 Mar 2018 |
No adverse
environmental issue was observed. |
NA |
Contract SS C505
9.2.9
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract SS C505 to evaluate the site environmental performance
has been carried out by the RE, ET and the Contractor on 7, 14, 21 and 28 March
2018 in which IEC joined the
site inspection on 28 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted.
9.2.10
The findings / deficiencies of Contract
SS C505 that observed during the weekly site inspection are listed in Table
9-5.
Table 9-5 Site
Observations for Contract SS C505
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
28 Feb 2018 (last reproting period) |
Food wastes were observed on the roof of
PTB. The Contractor was advised to perform housekeeping regularly. The Contractor was reminded to cover
stockpiles entirely after construction work. |
Food wastes were removed and disposed
properly. Not required for reminder. |
7 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor was reminded to clean the
stagnant water on the ground of PTB. |
Not required for reminder. |
14 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was
observed. |
NA |
21 Mar 2018 |
Concrete breaking without water spraying
was observed at stockpile area. The Contractor was advised to provide water
spraying for dusty activity to avoid dust emission. |
Water spraying was implemented during
concrete activity. |
28 Mar 2018 |
Oil leakage was observed on the ground of
1/F
in front of PTB. The Contractor should clean the oil leakage and dispose of
as chemical wastes. Besides, the Contractor should also provide proper label
for chemical container and place chemical containers inside drip tray. |
To be followed. |
|
Contract 7
9.2.11
In the Reporting Period, joint site
inspection for Contract 7 to evaluate the site environmental performance has
been carried out by the RE, IEC, ET and the Contractor on 2, 9, 16, 22 and
28 March 2018. No non-compliance was noted.
9.2.12
The findings / deficiencies of Contract
7 that observed during the weekly site inspection are listed in Table
9-6.
Table 9-6 Site
Observations for Contract 7
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
2 Mar 2018 |
No adverse environmental issue was observed during site inspection. |
NA. |
9 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor was reminded to provide proper mitigation measure along
site boundary near Bridge E to avoid potential runoff out of site. |
Not required for reminder. |
16 Mar 2018 |
Accumulation of general waste was observed on the ground. The Contractor
was advised to dispose it regularly.
Open stockpiles were observed near bridge E. The Contractor was advised
to cover it to prevent dust emission. |
The scattered general waste was cleaned.
Stockpiles are covered to prevent dust emission. |
22 Mar 2018 |
The Contractor was reminded that wastewater should be treated before
discharge and to comply with the discharge license. Besides, wastewater
treatment facility should be provided and maintained.
Wet season is coming, it was remidned that preventive measures for
surface runoff should be enhanced and maintained. |
Not required for reminder.
Not required for reminder. |
28 Mar 2018 |
Leakage of waste water from sedimentation tank was observed near site
entrance. The Contractor was advised to have regular maintenance on
sedimentation tanks near site entrance. The Contractor was reminded to provide proper mitigation measure along
site boundary to avoid potential runoff out of site. The Contractor was reminded to remove sediment at discharge area near
site entrance. |
Proper maintenance was carried out on the sedimentation tanks.
Not required for reminder.
Not required for reminder. |
9.2.13
General housekeeping such as daily site
tidiness and cleanliness should be
maintained for all Contracts. Furthermore, the Contractors were
reminded to implement Waste Management Plan of the Project.
10.1.1
In
the Reporting Period, two (2) documented environmental complaints were received
under the EM&A program of the Project which related to dust and water
quality issue. No summons and prosecution under the EM&A
Programme was lodged for all Contracts. The status
of the outstanding investigation report in previous months is summarized below.
Date of complaint |
Complaint Detail |
Investigation Status |
24 January 2018 (pervious reporting period) |
A complaint was raised by EPD regarding observations
of some spoils was dropped into the sea during the offloading operation at
Cheung Sha Wan Pier. |
Investigation was carried out at Cheung Sha Wan
Pier on 9 Feb. The IR revealed that the operation
of the jetty is managed by Tapbo Civil Engineering
Company Limit as a transfer station for unloading excavated materials from various sources and it was not a newly
constructed barging point for the Project use. The unloaded materials of
Contract 2 will be subsequently delivered to the designated disposal ground,
TM38 or TKO137. Dust mitigation
measures and preventive measures to avoid spoil from dropping into the sea
were provided during spoils offloading. It is considered that no breaches of
EP¡¦s conditions and improper disposal were involved. The IR was completed by ET without comment by IEC
which enclosed in Appendix O. |
4 March 2018 |
A public complaint was received via 1823
regarding the cleanliness of Lin Ma Hang Road. (Dust and Water Quality) |
Investigation was carried out for related
Contract 6, Contract 7 and Contract SS C505 accordingly. The IR revealed that the conditions of all site exits under the
project were well maintained without mud and debris and no excessive water
spraying and slurry was found on LMH road. However, a deficiency at Gate 1
under Contract 6 was observed and rectified immediately without affecting the
public. Since there were many other heavy vehicles
apart from the project using LMH Road and certain
number of unknown exit sites without proper management along LMH Road, it is
considered that the complaint was not related to the works under the Project. The IR was completed by ET without comment by IEC
which enclosed in Appendix O. |
28 February 2018 (received by ET on 6 Mar 2018) |
A public complaint was
received from Project Hotline regarding the cleanliness of Sha Tau Kok (STK) Road ¡V Ma Mei Ha Section (Dust and Water Quality) |
Investigation was carried out for related
Contract 2 and Contract 6 accordingly. The IR revealed that the Contractors have been well maintained the wheel washing facilities
and no dust and soil carrying
by site vehicles to STK road were observed.
The complaint was suspected to be caused by
frequent use of dump truck transporting loose material to NENT and the
majority of dump truck was not belong to LT/HYW project. The IR was completed by ET without comment by IEC
which enclosed in Appendix O. |
10.1.2
The statistical summary of environmental complaint is
presented in Tables 10-1, 10-2 and 10-3.
Table 10-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Reporting Period |
Contract No |
Environmental
Complaint Statistics |
Project related
complaint |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|||
19 May 2014 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
33 |
(18)Water Quality (8) Dust (5) Noise (1) dust & noise (1) waste management
|
(6) water quality (2) dust (1) noise |
06 Nov 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 3 |
0 |
6 |
(2) Dust (3) Water quality (1) Noise |
0 |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 5 |
0 |
4 |
(3) Dust (1) Noise |
0 |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 6 |
0 |
36 |
(23) Water Quality (8) Dust (3) Noise (1) Nuisance (1) Noise and dust |
(7) water quality (3) dust (1) Nuisance (1) Water quality and dust |
15 Feb 2016 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 7 |
0 |
2 |
(1) Noise (1) Water quality and dust |
(1) Water quality and dust |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
SS C505 |
0 |
3 |
(1) Noise (1) dust (1) Water quality and dust |
(1) Water quality and dust |
1 ¡V 31 Mar 2018 |
Contract 2 |
1 |
34 |
(18)Water Quality (8) Dust (5) Noise (1) dust & noise (1) waste management
(1) Water quality and dust |
NA |
Contract 3 |
0 |
6 |
(2) Dust (3) Water quality (1) Noise |
NA |
|
Contract 4 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
NA |
|
Contract 6 |
2 |
38 |
(23) Water Quality (8) Dust (3) Noise (1) Nuisance (1) Noise and dust (2) Water quality and dust |
NA |
|
Contract 7 |
1 |
3 |
(1) Noise (2) Water quality and dust |
NA |
|
SS C505 |
1 |
4 |
(1) Noise (1) dust (2) Water quality and dust |
NA |
Table 10-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Reporting Period |
Contract No |
Environmental
Summons Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
||
19 May 2014 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
1 |
contravening the Water Pollution Control
(General) Regulations |
06 Nov 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 3 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 5 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 6 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
15 Feb 2016 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 7 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 ¡V 31 Mar 2018 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
1 |
NA |
Contract 3 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
Contract 4 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
Contract 6 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
Contract 7 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Table 10-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecutions
Reporting Period |
Contract No |
Environmental
Prosecutions Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
||
19 May 2014 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
1 |
contravening the Water Pollution Control
(General) Regulations |
06 Nov 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 3 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 5 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 6 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
15 Feb 2016 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
Contract 7 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
16 Aug 2013 ¡V 28 Feb 2018 |
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 ¡V 31 Mar 2018 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
1 |
NA |
Contract 3 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
Contract 4 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
Contract 6 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
Contract 7 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
|
SS C505 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
11.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that
recommended in the Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation
Measures (ISEMM) in the approved EM&A Manual covered the issues of dust,
noise, water and waste and they are summarized presented in Appendix
M.
11.1.2
All contracts under the Project shall be
implementing the required environmental mitigation measures according to the
approved EM&A Manual as subject to the site condition. Environmental mitigation measures
generally implemented by Contracts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and Contract SS C505 in this Reporting Period are summarized in
Table
11-1.
Table 11-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental
Mitigation Measures |
Water Quality |
¡P Wastewater to be treated by
the wastewater treatment facilities i.e. sedimentation tank or similar
facility before discharge. |
Air Quality |
¡P Maintain damp / wet surface
on access road ¡P Low vehicular speed within
the works areas. ¡P All vehicles must use wheel
washing facility before off site ¡P Sprayed water during
breaking works ¡P A
cleaning truck was regularly performed on the public road to prevent fugitive dust emission |
Noise |
¡P Restrain operation time of
plants from 07:00 to 19:00 on any working day except for Public Holiday and
Sunday. ¡P Keep good maintenance of
plants ¡P Place noisy plants away from
residence or school ¡P Provide noise barriers or
hoarding to enclose the noisy plants or works ¡P Shut down the plants when
not in used. |
Waste and Chemical Management |
¡P On-site sorting prior to
disposal ¡P Follow requirements and
procedures of the ¡§Trip-ticket System¡¨ ¡P Predict required quantity of
concrete accurately ¡P Collect the unused fresh
concrete at designated locations in the sites for subsequent disposal |
General |
¡P The site was generally kept
tidy and clean. |
11.2.1
As advised by the ER, the construction works
under Contract 5 was substantially completed on 31 August 2016. Construction activities for other
Contracts in the coming month are listed below:
Contract 2
Mid-Vent Portal |
Construction of Cut and Cover
structure and backfilling
Construction of adit enlargement internal structure
Stud tunnel internal
structure and E&M installation
Ventilation building superstructure, fence wall, internal
fitting out and E&M installation
Structure connecting adit tunnel and ventilation building
Permanent drainage and underground utilities |
North Portal |
Construction of retaining wall, permanent
drainage, site formation and slip road
Tunnel waterproofing, lining,
backfilling and E&M installation
Construction of cross passage and internal structure
TBM North drive excavation
North ventilation building superstructure,
internal structure and backfilling
Drainage cleansing and construction of temporary
utility bridge across the mid-platform |
South Portal |
Waterproofing and lining
activities inside the tunnel
Construction of tunnel cross
passage, tunnel backfilling and E&M installation
South ventilation building
fitting out and E&M installation
Construction of retaining walls
and backfilling activities |
Admin Building |
Construction of permanent
drainage, permanent drainage, fence wall and underground utilities
Building internal structure,
fitting out, E&M installation and soft landscaping |
Contract 3
Cable detection and trial trenches
Remaining works on new Footbridge
Noise barrier construction
Road pavement works
Demolition of Existing Kiu Tau Vehicular Bridge
Water main laying works
Installation of Noise barrier steel column & panel, and sign gantry
(on Grade and on bridge deck)
Parapet Installation on bridge deck
Road Drainage Works
Construction of profile barrier & Planter wall on Bridge deck
Stressing of external tendon
Bitumen paving on bridge deck
Installation of deck cell light inside the bridge deck
Installation of movement joint on the bridge
Construction of retaining wall behind abutment
Landscaping works
Contract 4
System design and testing
E&M installation at Admin Building
E&M installation at Ventilation Building
High mast erection
E&A installation at OHVD in tunnel
Contract 6
Bridge
construction
Tunnel Works
Sewage Treatment Plant Construction
Tunnel Ventilation Building Construction
Slip Road/At-grade Road/Periphery Road Construction
Contract 7
U-trough and
abutment construction at Bridge E
Deck construction
at Bridge A and E
Profile barrier
construction at Bridge B and D
Construction of Façade and BMU at Bridge C
Contract SS C505
Building no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 41
constructions
Constructions of Steel Canopies (Building no. 32,
33, 34 and 35)
Constructions of Master Water Meter Room 1, 2 and 3
(Building no. 42, 43, 44)
Tower crane operation
Bridge 1 - 5 construction works including retaining
wall, road and finishes works
Steel Canopies construction
Underground drainage works, Road Works, CLP Cable
laying and Landscaping
Formwork and falsework for PTB¡¦s slab and internal
wall construction
Construction PTB M/F, 1/F, 2/F and Roof flat slab
Construction PTB non-structural wall, Underground
Drainage and Utilities, Fence Wall, Southern Entrance Construction
Backfilling works
PTB Major Plant Rooms ABWF & MEP Installation,
Lift and Escalator Installation by NSC
Integrated ABWF & MEP Works in PTB, Building
no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 18, 36 and 41
Elevated Walkway E1, E2, E3 and E4 construction
Tower Crane Dismantling Works
11.3.1
Key
issues to be considered in the coming month for Contracts 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and SS C505 include:
Implementation of control measures for
rainstorm;
Regular clearance of stagnant water during
wet season;
Implementation of dust suppression measures
at all times;
Potential wastewater quality impact due to
surface runoff;
Potential fugitive dust quality impact due
from the dry/loose/exposure soil surface/dusty material;
Disposal of empty engine oil containers
within site area;
Ensure dust suppression measures are
implemented properly;
Sediment catch-pits and silt removal
facilities should be regularly maintained;
Management of chemical wastes;
Discharge of site effluent to the nearby
wetland, stockpiling or disposal of materials, and any dredging or construction
area at this area are prohibited;
Follow-up of improvement on general waste
management issues; and
Implementation of construction noise
preventative control measures
12.1.1
This is the 56th monthly EM&A report presenting the monitoring results and inspection
findings for the Reporting Period from 1 to 31 March 2018.
12.1.2
For
air quality monitoring, no 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP monitoring results triggered the Action or
Limit Levels were recorded.
12.1.3
In the Reporting Period, no construction
noise measurement results that exceeded the Limit Level were recorded. Moreover, no valid noise
complaint which triggered an Action Level exceedance was recorded.
12.1.4
For water quality monitoring, a total of 4 LL exceedances, namely 2 LL exceedance of turbidity and 2 LL exceedances of Suspended Solids were recorded. Investigation reports revealed that the
Contractor had properly implemented water quality mitigation measures such as
well-maintained the wastewater treatment facility and covered the expose area
with impervious sheet. It was
concluded that all the exceedances were not related to the works under the
Project.
12.1.5
In this Reporting
Period, 2 environmental
complaints were received
regarding to the dust and water quality issue on Sha Tau Kok
Road and Lin Ma Hang Road. The investigation for the complaint was
completed by ET. The IRs revealed
that the
conditions of all site exits under the Project were well maintained without mud
and debris and no excessive water spraying and slurry was found on the
complaint roads. Since there were
many other heavy vehicles apart from the project using complaint roads and mitigation measures were properly implemented by the
Contractor, it is considered that the complaints were not related to the works
under the Project.
12.1.6
In
the Reporting Period, no environmental summons and prosecution under the EM&A
Programme was lodged for all Contracts.
12.1.7
During
the Reporting Period, weekly joint site inspection by the RE, IEC, ET with the relevant Main-contractor
were carried out for Contracts 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 in accordance with the EM&A Manual
stipulation. For Contract SS C505, weekly
joint site inspection was carried out
by the RE, IEC, ET
and main-contractor
whereas IEC performed
monthly site inspection. No non-compliance observed during the
site inspection.
12.2.1
As wet
season is approaching, preventive measures for muddy water or other water
pollutants from site surface flow to local stream such as Kong Yiu Channel, Ma
Wat Channel, Ping Yuen River, Kwan Tei River or public
area should be properly maintained.
The Contractors should paid special attention on water quality
mitigation measures and fully implement according ISEMM of the EM&A Manual,
in particular for working areas near Ma Wat Channel and Ping Yuen River.
12.2.2
In
addition, all effluent discharge shall be ensure to fulfill Technical
Memorandum of Effluent Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, inland
and Coastal Waters criteria or discharge permits stipulation.
12.2.3
Construction
noise would be a key environmental issue during construction work of the
Project. Noise mitigation measures
such as using quiet plants should be implemented in accordance with the
EM&A requirement.
12.2.4
Since
most of construction sites under the Project are located adjacent to villages,
the Contractors should fully implement air quality mitigation measures to
reduce construction dust emission.
12.2.5
Furthermore, daily cleaning and weekly tidiness shall be properly performed
and maintained. In addition, mosquito
control should be kept to prevent mosquito breeding on site.